Vascularized Inter-positional Periosteal Connective-tissue Flap Versus Collagen Membrane in Guided Bone Regeneration
VIP-CT
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
this study compares 2 techniques in guided bone regeneration for horizontal ridge augmentation in aesthetic zone
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 14, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2023
CompletedApril 14, 2023
April 1, 2023
5 months
April 2, 2023
April 2, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Amount of bone width gain (horizontal augmentation)
bone width gain is measured in millimeters by Cone beam computed tomography
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of bone formation in the bone biopsy
6 months
Study Arms (2)
vascularized interpositional periosteal connective tissue flap
EXPERIMENTALVascularized inter-positional periosteal connective tissue flap (VIPCTF) may have many advantages over traditional collagen membranes such as; high vascularity, decreased cost (as it may substitute membrane), providing an increase in soft tissue thickness, and reusability.
collagen membrane
ACTIVE COMPARATORCollagen membranes are the most commonly used and can inhibit soft tissue growth in bone defects, They achieve better wound healing and bone regeneration.
Interventions
It is a vascularized pedicled flap derived from the hard palate that can be used as a barrier to prevent in growth of soft tissue in guided bone regeneration and to increase soft tissue quantity
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with a horizontal defect in anterior and premolar areas of the maxilla (aesthetic zone).
You may not qualify if:
- poor oral hygiene
- radiation therapy of head and neck cancer
- intraoral soft and hard tissue lesions
- Heavy smoking
- Bone pathology
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of dentistry Cairo university
Cairo, 12311, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
Khajehahmadi, S., & Rahpeyma, A. (2014). Vascularized interpositional periosteal connective tissue flap in implant dentistry. Journal of Dental Implants, 4(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-6781.130952
BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Esraa Ismail, Maters
Cairo University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2023
First Posted
April 14, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2023
Primary Completion
June 1, 2023
Study Completion
December 1, 2023
Last Updated
April 14, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share