Gluteus Maximus Versus Gluteus Medius Strength On Back Muscles Performance In Patients With Sacroiliac Dysfunction
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will be conducted to compare between the effect of glutes maximus and glutes medius muscles strength on back muscle performance in patients with Sacroiliac joint dysfunction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 17, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 10, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 12, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2023
CompletedApril 12, 2023
March 1, 2023
2 months
March 17, 2023
March 30, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Assessing the change in the peak torque of back muscles
By using isokinetic dynamometer, and the unit of of measurement will be (Kg).
at baseline and after 5 weeks of intervention
Assessing the change in pain threshold
by using Traditional pressure algometers are ideal for measuring pressure pain threshold (PPTs) of superficial muscles and bony landmarks. Pressure pain threshold has been defined as the lowest stimulus intensity at which a subject perceives mechanical pain
at baseline and after 5 weeks of intervention
Assessing the change in Functional ability level
By using Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ). The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire Arabic version will be used to measure disability caused by low back pain in the general population. It consists of 10 questions each consisting of six alternatives. Every question is scored from 0-5 and a percentage are formulated as a result of the sum of the scores.
at baseline and after 5 weeks of intervention
Assessing the change in pain intensity
By using visual analogue scale (VAS). This scale will be used to measure the intensity of pain. It has been graded as a 10-cm line, which was used for measuring the intensity of perceived pain. In this scale, zero represents the absence of pain, 1-3 shows mild pain, 4-6 denotes moderate pain, and 7-10 indicates severe pain
at baseline and after 5 weeks of intervention
Study Arms (3)
Glutes maximus Strengthening group
EXPERIMENTALTwenty patients received Strengthening exercises for Glutes maximus muscle and conventional physical therapy (corrective exercises and ultrasound).
Glutes Medius Strengthening group
EXPERIMENTALTwenty patients received Strengthening exercises for Glutes medius muscle and conventional physical therapy (corrective Exercises and therapeutic ultrasound (US).
Conventional treatment group
ACTIVE COMPARATORTwenty Patients received conventional therapy (corrective exercises and ultrasound).
Interventions
The subjects attended physical therapy two times. Per week for a total of 10 visits. Each session lasted approximately 30 minutes. In the first five sessions, subjects performed the following exercises to strengthen the gluteus maximus: bilateral bridge, unilateral bridge, and non-weight-bearing hip extension in prone with the knee flexed at 90 degrees. In the next five sessions, abduction and external rotation in a quadruped ("fire hydrant" exercise) and weight-bearing hip extension (known as "deadlift" exercise) were added. Each exercise was performed for 10 repetitions. Elastic resistance was added to the fire hydrant, hip extension in prone and dead lift exercises to allow each subject to perform at a 10-repetition maximum. The resistance for each subject was adjusted weekly as needed. The exercise program was performed under direct supervision only during the physical therapy sessions.
Strengthening exercises for Gluteus Medius subdivisions: The anterior GMED exercise: side lying abduction exercise The middle GMED exercise: wall press Exercise The posterior GMED exercise: was the pelvic drop exercise
The following low back corrective exercises were given: To stretch the tight lower back muscles: Seated Forward Bend and Full Squat held for 5 sec and Repeated for 3 times, once a day. To strengthen the weak lower abdomen: Draw in and Reverse Crunch 3 seconds, repeated 5 times, once a day. To stretch the tight hip flexors: held for 10-15 seconds repeated 5 times on both legs, once a day. To stretch the tight quadriceps: held for 3 seconds, repeated 5 times on each side, once a day. To strengthen weak hamstrings: Kick Butts 2 sec, repeated 8 times, once a day.
US was administered in continuous mode at PSIS with patient in prone lying position, with a frequency of 1 MHz and intensity of 0.8 W/cm2 for 5 minutes every alternating day
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age from 25-40 years.
- Patients with chronic lumbopelvic pain (more than 12 weeks) and clinical test positive for SIJD.
- The pain distribution and tenderness on palpation under the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) are reliable signs that the SIJ is the source of pain.
- Complaint of unilateral pain rather than bilateral pain is also considered more likely to be coming from an SIJ.
- Patients willing and able to participate in an exercise program safely and without cognitive impairments that would limit their participation.
You may not qualify if:
- Neurological disorder, psychosomatic disorder
- Tumor.
- Infection condition.
- Recent surgeries.
- Pregnancy.
- Back pain referred from organic cause.
- Osteoporosis and bone disease (induced or idiopathic).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Outpatient clinic faculty of physica therapy cairo university
Dokki, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Reham Abd El-Moneim
Cairo University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2023
First Posted
April 12, 2023
Study Start
April 10, 2023
Primary Completion
June 15, 2023
Study Completion
August 15, 2023
Last Updated
April 12, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03