Laser Treatment for Facial and Neck Rejuvenation
Evaluation of the UltraClear Laser Workstation for the Treatment of Facial and Neck Rejuvenation and Skin Resurfacing Augmented With Mesenchymal Stem Cell Extract
1 other identifier
interventional
15
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
To assess the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction associated with the treatment of the face and neck with the 2,910nm mid-infrared UltraClear Laser System using both superficial epidermal ablation and deep ablative and coagulative capabilities in the dermis for rejuvenation of photodamaged skin. Additionally, this study will assess the additive value of a post-treatment skincare regimen consisting of a serum and cream containing red deer umbilical cord lining mesenchymal stem cell conditioned media for faster healing and more robust rejuvenation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 3, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 11, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2024
CompletedApril 11, 2023
April 1, 2023
11 months
March 20, 2023
April 10, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Fitzpatrick-Goldman Classification of Wrinkling and Degree of Elastosis Scale to assess change (blinded investigator)
Fitzpatrick-Goldman Classification of Wrinkling and Degree of Elastosis Scale - FACE TO BE COMPLETED BY BLINDED INVESTIGATOR Class: Wrinkling Score Degree of Elastosis I Fine Wrinkles 1 -3 Mild II Fine to Moderate 4 -6 Moderate III Fine to Deep 7 -9 Severe
Baseline, Day 60, Day 250
Scientific Assessment Scale of Skin Quality to assess change (SASSQ) (blinded investigator)
SCIENTIFIC ASSESSMENT SCALE OF SKIN QUALITY (SASSQ) Elasticity: 0-None 1-Mild 2-Moderate 3-Severe 4-Very Severe Wrinkles: 0-None 1-Mild 2-Moderate 3-Severe 4-Very Severe Skin Surface Roughness: 0-None 1-Mild 2-Moderate 3-Severe 4-Very Severe Pigmentation: 0-None 1-Mild 2-Moderate 3-Severe 4-Very Severe Erythema: 0-None 1-Mild 2-Moderate 3-Severe 4-Very Severe Pore Size: 0-None 1-Mild 2-Moderate 3-Severe 4-Very Severe
Baseline, Day 160, Day 250
Classification of Facial Wrinkles Assessment to assess change (blinded investigator)
Classification of Facial Wrinkles Assessment: Preauricular Lines: 0-None 1-Very Mild 2-Mild 3-Moderate 4-Severe 5-Extreme Cheek Folds: 0-None 1-Very Mild 2-Mild 3-Moderate 4-Severe 5-Extreme Upper Lip Lines: 0-None 1-Very Mild 2-Mild 3-Moderate 4-Severe 5-Extreme
Baseline, Day 160, Day 250
Neck Skin Crepiness/Laxity Grading Scale to assess change (blinded investigator)
Neck Skin Crepiness/Laxity Grading Scale: Score Classification Description 0 None No Loose Skin 1. Mild Mildly Loose Skin 2. Moderate Moderately Loose Skin 3. Severe Very Loose Skin 4. Extreme Prominent redundancy of loose skin
Baseline, Day 160, Day 250
Visia Skin Analysis to assess change
Visia Skin Analysis (insert percentage 1 - 100%) Description: Percentage: Brown Spots Pores Spots Porphyrin Red Areas Texture UV Spots Wrinkles
Baseline, Day 160, Day 250
Physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale to assess change (PGAIS) (blinded investigator)
Physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Assessment (PGAIS) Rating Description 1. Very Much Improved: Optimal cosmetic result in this subject. 2. Much Improved: Marked improvement in appearance from the initial condition, but not completely optimal for this subject. 3. Improved: Obvious improvement in appearance from initial condition, but a re- treatment is indicated. 4. No Change: The appearance is essentially the same as the original condition. 5. Worse: The appearance is worse than the original condition. Scores (write a number under each treated area or circle "Not Treated") FACE NECK not treated not treated
Day 160, Day 250
Percent Improvement Evaluation to assess change
Percent Improvement Evaluation: Degree of improvement from clinical evaluation, compare to baseline, using a 1-10 scale. 1 (0-10%) 2 (10-20%) 3 (20-30%) 4(30-40%) 5 (40-50%) 6 (50-60%) 7 (60-70%) 8 (70-80%) 9 (80-90%) 10 (90-100%)
Day 160, Day 250
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Evaluation of side effects and adverse events by Investigator to assess change
Baseline, Day 35, Day 70, Day 160, Day 250
Comfort Level Visual Analog Scale post laser procedure to assess change (completed by subject)
Baseline, Day 35, Day 70
Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale to assess change (SGAIS)
Day 160, Day 250
Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire to assess change
Day 160, Day 250
Study Arms (2)
Group A CeraVe
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects will be given a skincare regimen consisting of CeraVe products to be applied to the face and neck following laser treatment.
Group B Calecim
SHAM COMPARATORSubjects will be given a skincare regimen consisting of CeraVe products and Calecim products to be applied to the face and neck following laser treatment.
Interventions
* CeraVe gentle facial cleanser (CeraVe; New York, NY) to be used morning and evening * CeraVe lotion (CeraVe; New York, NY) to be used morning and evening, reapply as needed for dry skin * A mineral CeraVe sunscreen (CeraVe; New York, NY) to be applied in the morning and reapplied every 2 hours if going outside
* CeraVe gentle facial cleanser (CeraVe; New York, NY) to be used morning and evening * Calecim® Professional Serum (CellResearch Corporation; Singapore) to be used morning and evening * Calecim® Restorative Hydration Cream (CellResearch Corporation; Singapore) to be used morning and evening, reapply as needed for dry skin * A mineral CeraVe sunscreen (CeraVe; New York, NY) to be applied in the morning and reapplied every 2 hours if going outside
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult males and females aged 18 to 75 years
- Fitzpatrick skin types I-V
- Subjects in good general health based on investigator's judgment and medical history
- Must be willing to give and sign an informed consent form and photographic release form
- Willingness to have examinations of face and neck and digital photographs performed of the face and neck
- Physician evaluator classifying the subject as moderate to severe (Class II-III, Score 4-9) on the Fitzpatrick-Goldman Classification of Wrinkling and Degree of Elastosis Scale for the face and neck.
- The subject must be planning to undergo fractional ablative laser resurfacing to the face and neck and be willing to comply with study protocol and complete the entire course of the study.
- Subjects using any treatment skincare products (per investigator discretion) must discontinue use of these products before the start of participating in this clinical study and for the duration of the study.
- Male subjects with facial hair must be willing to shave the morning of the procedure.
- Must be willing to maintain usual sun exposure
- Subject agrees to avoid tanning or use of sunless tanner during the entire course of the study
- Negative urine pregnancy test result at the time of study entry (if applicable)
- For female subjects of childbearing potential, must be willing to use an acceptable form of birth control during the entire course of the study. All systemic birth control measures must be in consistent use for at least 30 days prior to study enrollment.
- A female is considered of childbearing potential unless she is postmenopausal, without a uterus and/or both ovaries, or has had a bilateral tubal ligation.
- Acceptable methods of birth control are: oral contraceptives, contraceptive patches/rings/implants, Implanon®, Depo-Provera®, double-barrier methods (e.g., condoms and spermicide), abstinence, and/or vasectomy of partner with a documented second acceptable method of birth control, should the subject become sexually active.
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Energy-based device (i.e., radiofrequency device treatments, microfocused ultrasound device or other ultrasound-based device treatments, laser and light-based device treatments, microneedling) treatment in the treatment area in the last 6 months
- Chemical peel or microdermabrasion of the face within 30 days prior to enrollment in the study
- Surgery (i.e., face lift, eyebrow lift, neck lift or lower rhytidectomy, liposuction to the neck and/or submentum, etc.) during the 12-month period before study treatment
- Any investigational treatment for improvement of skin quality and/or photodamage of facial skin during the 12-month period before the study treatment
- Recent use of topical tretinoin, adapalene, tazarotene, hydroquinone, imiquimod, 5-fluorouracil, ingenol mebutate, concentrated hydrogen peroxide, diclofenac, or photodynamic therapy (PDT) to the face within the previous 4 weeks
- Subjects must not currently be taking isotretinoin (Accutane).
- Creams/cosmeceuticals and/or home therapies to prevent or treat photodamage, uneven skin pigmentation, excessive erythema (redness), fine lines/wrinkles, skin laxity and/or pore size during the 4-week period before study treatment
- Subjects with scarring in the treatment areas
- Subjects with tattoos or permanent implants in the treatment areas
- Subjects with a significant history or current evidence of a medical, psychological, or other disorder that, in the investigator's opinion, would preclude enrollment into the study
- Subjects with a history of or presence of any skin condition/disease (including but not limited to any visible rash, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, actinic keratoses, keratinocyte carcinoma, melanoma, etc.) in the treatment area that might interfere with the diagnosis or evaluation of study parameters
- Skin with open wounds, excessively sensitive skin, neurotic excoriations, dermatitis or inflammatory rosacea in the treatment area
- History of keloid or hypertrophic scarring
- Subjects with an active bacterial, viral, or fungal infection of the treatment areas or systemic infection
- Subjects who spray tanned or used sunless tanners in the treatment areas four (4) weeks prior to study treatment
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Goldman, Butterwick, Fitzpatrick and Grofflead
- Acclaro Corporationcollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Freia Canals Cistero, RN
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The blinded investigator will complete the - Fitzpatrick-Goldman Classification of Wrinkling and Degree of Elastosis Scale of face and neck, the Scientific Assessment Scale of Skin Quality (SASSQ) to grade the subject's skin quality of face and neck, the Classification of Facial Wrinkles Assessment and the Blinded Investigator Neck Skin Crepiness/Laxity Grading Scale.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2023
First Posted
April 11, 2023
Study Start
April 3, 2023
Primary Completion
February 28, 2024
Study Completion
February 28, 2024
Last Updated
April 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04