NCT05806840

Brief Summary

Using a 2-group, mixed method cluster randomized trial design, this study will compare standard implementation versus RAPD implementation strategy in Michigan Middle Schools

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
12

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 2, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 10, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 6, 2023

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 14, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

March 2, 2023

Last Update Submit

June 12, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • RAPD Strategy Feasibility

    The investigators use a mixed methods approach to determine teacher perceived feasibility of the RAPD implementation strategy (Feasibility of Implementation Measure). Feasibility is defined as the extent to which the innovation (RAPD) can be practically used in a given setting.

    9 Months

  • RAPD Strategy Acceptability

    The investigators use a mixed methods approach to determine teacher perceived acceptability of the RAPD implementation strategy (Acceptability of Implementation Measure). Acceptability is defined as the view among stakeholders that a given innovation (RAPD) is agreeable or satisfactory.

    9 Months

  • RAPD Strategy Appropriateness

    The investigators use a mixed methods approach to determine teacher perceived appropriateness of the RAPD implementation strategy (Implementation Appropriateness Measure). Appropriateness is defined as the perceived compatibility of an innovation (RAPD) with needs and practices of the setting and the perceived utility in addressing a given problem.

    9 Months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • MMH Fidelity

    9 Months

Study Arms (2)

Standard Michigan Model for Health (MMH) Curriculum Implementation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Standard implementation of the MMH (Michigan Model for Health), a universal prevention intervention includes curriculum materials, foundational curriculum training and as-needed technical assistance, provided by the regional school health coordinators.

Behavioral: Standard Implementation

Rapid Adaptation to Prevent Drug Use (RAPD)

EXPERIMENTAL

RAPD is a novel bundle of implementation strategies to improve the responsiveness of an existing evidence-based intervention (EBI), the Michigan Model for Health (MMH) for urgent drug events. These implementation strategies will be deployed in addition to standard implementation components.

Behavioral: Rapid Adaptation to Prevent Drug Use (RAPD)

Interventions

RAPD will include a novel bundle of implementation strategies to support rapid responses to urgent drug use events. The strategies deployed will be based on the first step of the After Action Review: critical analysis and reflection.

Rapid Adaptation to Prevent Drug Use (RAPD)

Standard implementation of the Michigan Model for Health (MMH) includes curriculum materials and as-needed technical assistance provided by a school health coordinator.

Standard Michigan Model for Health (MMH) Curriculum Implementation

Eligibility Criteria

Age11 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Schools that fail to meet state standards for implementation (less than 80% of curriculum) and/or face one or more barriers to Michigan Model for Health (MMH) curriculum implementation
  • Schools that have a minimum of 25% of students eligible for free and reduced meals
  • Schools must include 7th-grade classes/students

You may not qualify if:

  • Schools that meet state identified fidelity standards (i.e., teaching 80% or more of the curriculum) and do not face barriers to MMH implementation
  • Schools that have fewer than 25% of students eligible for free and reduced meals
  • Schools that do not include 7th-grade education level

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Wayne State University

Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.

    PMID: 28851459BACKGROUND
  • Wiltsey Stirman S, Baumann AA, Miller CJ. The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 6;14(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0898-y.

    PMID: 31171014BACKGROUND
  • Eisman AB, Koffkey C, Brown S, Holmes C, Schmidt B, Swihart E, Robinson T, Kim B. Using After Action Review to Identify Rapid Response Implementation Strategies for Emerging Drugs Among Youth. Prev Sci. 2025 Feb;26(2):258-270. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01787-x. Epub 2025 Feb 10.

  • Eisman AB, Koffkey C, Partridge RT, Brown S, Kim B. Rapid Adaptation to Prevent Drug Use (RAPD): protocol of a pilot randomized trial to enhance the impact of an evidence-based intervention for youth. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Jan 21;11(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01581-6.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Substance-Related Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Chemically-Induced DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Andria Eisman, PhD

    Wayne State University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Community Health

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2023

First Posted

April 10, 2023

Study Start

September 6, 2023

Primary Completion

July 31, 2024

Study Completion

July 31, 2025

Last Updated

June 14, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Locations