Beta-Agonist Versus OnabotulinumtoxinA Trial for Urgency Urinary Incontinence
BEST
1 other identifier
interventional
432
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare treatment outcomes between an oral medication (beta agonist) versus onabotulinumtoxinA injections in women with urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). Participants will be randomly selected to receive one of the two treatments. The primary outcome measure will be at 3 months, and women will be followed for a total of 12 months. Based on patient expert input, there are 2 primary outcomes: Treatment satisfaction and urinary symptom severity. The study will also have a long-term follow-up component (prospective cohort) including 346 participants from the parent trial to describe treatment continuation, treatment efficacy, patient direct costs and other secondary outcomes up to 5 years after treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jun 2023
Longer than P75 for phase_4
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 10, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 6, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 15, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2030
September 25, 2025
September 1, 2025
3.1 years
November 15, 2022
September 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in score Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Symptom Bother Scale (OAB-q-SS) at 3 months
8-item questionnaire measuring symptom bother of overactive bladder symptoms, higher scores indicate more bothersome symptoms
Baseline until 3 months
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Treatment Satisfaction-General Questionnaire (FACIT-TS-G) at 3 months
Single item "How do you rate this treatment overall" on a 5-point likert scale
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Symptom Bother Scale (OAB-q-SS)
Baseline until 6, 9, 12 months
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Treatment Satisfaction-General Questionnaire (FACIT-TS-G) at 3 months
6, 9, 12 months
Change in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Health Related Quality of Life (OAB-q-HRQL)
Baseline to 3, 6, 9, 12 months
Change in Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-IR)
Baseline to 3, 6, 9, 12 months
Patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I)
3, 6, 9, 12 months
Other Outcomes (3)
PROMIS Cognitive Function-Short Form
Baseline to 3, 6, 9, 12 months
Continuation/discontinuation rate
From enrollment to end of long-term follow up 3-5 years for LTF cohort study n=346
Cost
From end of parent trial (12 months) to completion of long-term follow up study (3-5 years) for n=346
Study Arms (2)
Beta-3 receptor agonist oral medication
ACTIVE COMPARATORSelective beta-3 receptor agonist oral medication approved for the treatment of urgency urinary incontinence including mirabegron or vibegron. Usual clinical care standards will be used for prescribing and dosing changes. For mirabegron, dosages are 25 mg and 50 mg as clinically indicated. For vibegron, dosage is 75 mg daily by mouth as clinically indicated.
Intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA
ACTIVE COMPARATOROnabotulinumtoxinA at a dose of 100 units will be injected into the bladder per usual care pathways.
Interventions
The beta-agonist oral medication will be prescribed and dose adjusted per usual care.
OnabotulinumtoxinA will be prepared by dissolving 100 units into 10 ml of injectable saline. The injection will be an office based procedure, performed per usual care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years or older
- report at least "quite a bit bothered" or worse by their UUI defined by response to OAB-q-SS item #8 "How bothered are you by urine loss associated with a strong desire to urinate?"
- are not and do not plan to become pregnant
- have persistent UUI defined as previous unsuccessful results after conservative and anticholinergic treatment, or are unable to tolerate or have contraindications to anticholinergics
- are currently not taking anticholinergics or are willing to stop medication for 3 weeks prior to enrollment.
- for participants reporting mixed urinary incontinence symptoms, participant must (a) have less bother from SUI than from UUI, defined as a response of "Not at all bothered" or only "a little bit bothered" by SUI on the Urogenital Distress Inventory item "Do you experience urine leakage related to physical activity? (walking, running, laughing, sneezing, coughing), and (b) SUI symptoms be stable (\> 3 months), and (c)participant does not desire additional treatment for SUI in the upcoming 3 months.
- Participants after unsuccessful neuromodulation trial can be eligible after a 4-week washout period.
You may not qualify if:
- clinical contraindication to beta-3 agonist or onabotulinumtoxinA
- prior therapeutic trial of either study treatment
- unevaluated hematuria, current or prior bladder malignancy
- surgically altered detrusor muscle
- prior pelvic radiation
- post-void residual \>150 mL in past 3 months
- neurogenic bladder
- pelvic floor surgery within the past 3 months
- anticipating pelvic surgery within primary outcome follow up period (3 months)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Islandlead
- University of New Mexicocollaborator
- University of Alabama at Birminghamcollaborator
- University of California, San Diegocollaborator
- Howard Universitycollaborator
- Brown Universitycollaborator
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (5)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, California, 92093, United States
Howard University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20059, United States
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131, United States
Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Providence, Rhode Island, 02905, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vivian Sung, MD, MPH
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter Jeppson, MD
University of New Mexico
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Due to the nature of the interventions, masking of patients will not be possible; however, outcome assessors will be masked. Masked staff will not be able to see certain forms that may result in unmasking. All PROs will be administered prior to any clinical assessments to minimize bias that may occur due to clinical evaluation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, MPH, Professor of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University; Director of Research, Division of Urogynecology, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2022
First Posted
April 10, 2023
Study Start
June 6, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 15, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2030
Last Updated
September 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Once aims of original protocol are completed
The de-identified database once cleaned will be available to the team, collaborators, and broader scientific community once the primary paper is published per PCORI recommendations.