NCT05804643

Brief Summary

In this project, the investigators aim to investigate the imaging approaches for breast cancer-related secondary lymphedema. The clinical study aims to optimize the conventional MRI methods for mapping lymphedema and assess the post-surgical therapeutic effects in longitudinal follow-up studies. Additionally, a normal imaging database of lymphedema MRI images will be established for future reference. For pre-clinical animal study, investigators aim to develop and integrate two novel MRI methods, including free water elimination diffusion MRI and diffusion kurtosis MRI techniques. By integrating clinical and pre-clinical studies, the investigators aim to establish a precise imaging tool for evaluating the therapeutic effects of lymphedema for following translational applications.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
210

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
7mo left

Started Apr 2023

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress84%
Apr 2023Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 8, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 7, 2023

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 10, 2023

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2024

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

April 19, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

March 8, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 16, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Lymphedemasupermicrosurgical techniqueaxillary procedurespre-clinical animal modeldiffusion MRI

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • change from baseline circumference of both arms at 3 months after lymphaticovenous anastomosis

    circumference in cm

    baseline, 3 months after lymphaticovenous anastomosis

  • change from baseline volume of both arms at 3 months after lymphaticovenous anastomosis

    volume in mL

    baseline, 3 months after lymphaticovenous anastomosis

Study Arms (1)

Breast cancer related lymphedema

Breast cancer related lymphedema cases receive observational magnetic resonance imaging before and after lymphovenous anastomosis.

Procedure: Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging

Interventions

Free water elimination diffusion MRI and diffusion kurtosis MRI techniques

Breast cancer related lymphedema

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

adults with breast cancer related lymphedema

You may qualify if:

  • adults with breast cancer related lymphedema

You may not qualify if:

  • children younger than 20 years old
  • pregnancy
  • patients who have absolute contraindications regarding MRI scanning:
  • The cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) such as pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices.
  • Metallic intraocular foreign bodies.
  • Implantable neurostimulation systems
  • Cochlear implants/ear implant: bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) cochlear implant type can be scanned on a 1.5-tesla scanner only after the patient removes the battery. Cochlear implant wrapping scheduling must take place before the patient's MRI appointment.
  • Drug infusion pumps (insulin delivery, analgesic drugs, or chemotherapy pumps): If possible, the patient has to remove the device.
  • Catheters with metallic components (Swan-Ganz catheter)
  • Metallic fragments such as bullets, shotgun pellets, and metal shrapnel
  • Cerebral artery aneurysm clips
  • Magnetic dental implants
  • Tissue expander
  • Artificial limb
  • Hearing aid

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Taiwan university hospital

Taipei, Taiwan

RECRUITING

Related Publications (24)

  • Fu MR. Breast cancer-related lymphedema: Symptoms, diagnosis, risk reduction, and management. World J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug 10;5(3):241-7. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.241.

    PMID: 25114841BACKGROUND
  • Yang JC, Wu SC, Wang YM, Luo SD, Kuo SC, Chien PC, Tsai PY, Hsieh CH, Lin WC. Effect of Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis on Muscle Edema, Limb, and Subfascial Volume in Lower Limb Lymphedema: MRI Studies. J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Aug 1;235(2):227-239. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000236. Epub 2022 Apr 18.

    PMID: 35839398BACKGROUND
  • Garza R 3rd, Skoracki R, Hock K, Povoski SP. A comprehensive overview on the surgical management of secondary lymphedema of the upper and lower extremities related to prior oncologic therapies. BMC Cancer. 2017 Jul 5;17(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3444-9.

    PMID: 28679373BACKGROUND
  • Granzow JW, Soderberg JM, Kaji AH, Dauphine C. An effective system of surgical treatment of lymphedema. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Apr;21(4):1189-94. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3515-y. Epub 2014 Feb 13.

    PMID: 24522988BACKGROUND
  • Winters H, Tielemans HJP, Hameeteman M, Paulus VAA, Beurskens CH, Slater NJ, Ulrich DJO. The efficacy of lymphaticovenular anastomosis in breast cancer-related lymphedema. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Sep;165(2):321-327. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4335-0. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

    PMID: 28608029BACKGROUND
  • Executive Committee. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Lymphedema: 2016 Consensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology. 2016 Dec;49(4):170-84.

    PMID: 29908550BACKGROUND
  • Lohrmann C, Felmerer G, Foeldi E, Bartholoma JP, Langer M. MR lymphangiography for the assessment of the lymphatic system in patients undergoing microsurgical reconstructions of lymphatic vessels. Microvasc Res. 2008 May;76(1):42-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 Mar 20.

    PMID: 18456290BACKGROUND
  • Notohamiprodjo M, Weiss M, Baumeister RG, Sommer WH, Helck A, Crispin A, Reiser MF, Herrmann KA. MR lymphangiography at 3.0 T: correlation with lymphoscintigraphy. Radiology. 2012 Jul;264(1):78-87. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12110229. Epub 2012 Apr 20.

    PMID: 22523325BACKGROUND
  • Franconeri A, Ballati F, Panzuto F, Raciti MV, Smedile A, Maggi A, Asteggiano C, Esposito M, Stoppa D, Lungarotti L, Bortolotto C, Giardini D, De Silvestri A, Calliada F. A proposal for a semiquantitative scoring system for lymphedema using Non-contrast Magnetic Resonance Lymphography (NMRL): Reproducibility among readers and correlation with clinical grading. Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 May;68:158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

    PMID: 32057940BACKGROUND
  • Crescenzi R, Donahue PMC, Hartley KG, Desai AA, Scott AO, Braxton V, Mahany H, Lants SK, Donahue MJ. Lymphedema evaluation using noninvasive 3T MR lymphangiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Nov;46(5):1349-1360. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25670. Epub 2017 Feb 28.

    PMID: 28245075BACKGROUND
  • Arrive L, Derhy S, El Mouhadi S, Monnier-Cholley L, Menu Y, Becker C. Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Lymphography. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2016 Jan;32(1):80-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549133. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

    PMID: 25826439BACKGROUND
  • Lohrmann C, Foeldi E, Speck O, Langer M. High-resolution MR lymphangiography in patients with primary and secondary lymphedema. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Aug;187(2):556-61. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.1750.

    PMID: 16861563BACKGROUND
  • Bae JS, Yoo RE, Choi SH, Park SO, Chang H, Suh M, Cheon GJ. Evaluation of lymphedema in upper extremities by MR lymphangiography: Comparison with lymphoscintigraphy. Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Jun;49:63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.12.024. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

    PMID: 29306049BACKGROUND
  • Hagmann P, Jonasson L, Maeder P, Thiran JP, Wedeen VJ, Meuli R. Understanding diffusion MR imaging techniques: from scalar diffusion-weighted imaging to diffusion tensor imaging and beyond. Radiographics. 2006 Oct;26 Suppl 1:S205-23. doi: 10.1148/rg.26si065510.

    PMID: 17050517BACKGROUND
  • Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J. 1994 Jan;66(1):259-67. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80775-1.

    PMID: 8130344BACKGROUND
  • Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Ramani A, Lu H, Kaczynski K. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2005 Jun;53(6):1432-40. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20508.

    PMID: 15906300BACKGROUND
  • Jensen JH, Helpern JA. MRI quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by kurtosis analysis. NMR Biomed. 2010 Aug;23(7):698-710. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1518.

    PMID: 20632416BACKGROUND
  • Chhetri A, Li X, Rispoli JV. Current and Emerging Magnetic Resonance-Based Techniques for Breast Cancer. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 May 12;7:175. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00175. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 32478083BACKGROUND
  • Tang L, Zhou XJ. Diffusion MRI of cancer: From low to high b-values. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jan;49(1):23-40. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26293. Epub 2018 Oct 12.

    PMID: 30311988BACKGROUND
  • Li Z, Li X, Peng C, Dai W, Huang H, Li X, Xie C, Liang J. The Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in the Characterization of Breast Tumors: A Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 27;10:575272. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.575272. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 33194685BACKGROUND
  • Liu W, Wei C, Bai J, Gao X, Zhou L. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging in the differentiation of malignant from benign breast lesions. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Aug;117:156-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jun 17.

    PMID: 31307642BACKGROUND
  • Rosenkrantz AB, Padhani AR, Chenevert TL, Koh DM, De Keyzer F, Taouli B, Le Bihan D. Body diffusion kurtosis imaging: Basic principles, applications, and considerations for clinical practice. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Nov;42(5):1190-202. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24985. Epub 2015 Jun 26.

    PMID: 26119267BACKGROUND
  • Collier Q, Veraart J, Jeurissen B, Vanhevel F, Pullens P, Parizel PM, den Dekker AJ, Sijbers J. Diffusion kurtosis imaging with free water elimination: A bayesian estimation approach. Magn Reson Med. 2018 Aug;80(2):802-813. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27075. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

    PMID: 29393531BACKGROUND
  • Bergamino M, Walsh RR, Stokes AM. Free-water diffusion tensor imaging improves the accuracy and sensitivity of white matter analysis in Alzheimer's disease. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 26;11(1):6990. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86505-7.

    PMID: 33772083BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lymphedema

Interventions

Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lymphatic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

NeuroimagingDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomographyDiagnostic Techniques, NeurologicalInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Li-Wei Kuo, Ph.D.

    National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2023

First Posted

April 7, 2023

Study Start

April 10, 2023

Primary Completion

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

April 19, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Locations