Soft Active Back Exosuit to Reduce Workplace Back Pain
Efficacy of Soft Active Back Exosuit to Reduce the Risk of Occupational Low Back Pain and Injuries
2 other identifiers
interventional
97
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if a wearable back exosuit can make it safer and easier for workers who bend, lift, and lower objects in an industrial setting. Many studies have shown that wearable back exoskeletons or exosuits can provide helpful forces making a person's back muscles work less. It is believed that exosuits can lower a person's level of workplace effort and fatigue, making it less likely for them to have back pain at work. Back exosuits could be a solution to make a job easier, but how well they work in the real-world over a long period of time is unclear. The investigators want to know if workers who wear a back exosuit during the workday will have lower rates of lower back pain or injury than those who are not wearing a back exosuit. The investigators also want to know how well exosuit technology integrates into the workplace (for example, how this technology improves or hinders job performance). Participants will be randomized into an exosuit group or control group. Participants in the exosuit group will be given a back exosuit that they can use as much as they want at work. All participants will complete surveys monthly. Researchers will compare the exosuit group to the control group to see if using a back exosuit in a workplace can reduce a person's risk and impact of low back injury or pain. The investigators also want to see if a back exosuit impacts job productivity and if participants find the exosuit becomes useful or bothersome over time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Feb 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 8, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 7, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 26, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 26, 2025
CompletedMay 14, 2025
May 1, 2025
2.2 years
March 2, 2023
May 9, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Level of work-interfering low back pain (changes over time and differences between groups)
The Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (MDQ) is a composite score that considers the frequency, severity, and work interference of body aches and pains. The back pain score will be evaluated between the 2 groups at 5 time points.
Baseline, Months (1-4)
Self-reported incidence of low back pain (changes over time and differences between groups)
The definition of low back pain highly influences incidence rates. Low back pain incidence will be identified as a meaningful change (answering in the affirmative with a previous negative response) to the following self-report measures: Reporting a Cornell MDQ low back pain score \>13.5 Answering yes to: "In the past month, have you felt low back pain that caused you to change your activities for at least 3 days (i.e., have you noticed avoiding certain movements or moving differently than you normally do)?" Answering yes to: "In the past month, have you seen a health care provider for low back pain (i.e., a doctor, nurse, physical therapist, chiropractor, or another health care provider)?" Answering yes to: "In the past month, have you taken time off work for low back pain?"
Baseline, Months (1-4)
Workplace reported incidence of a low back injury (differences between groups)
Our industrial partner will record if a participant reports a workplace low back injury. The rates of reported events will be measured in each group.
Continuously from randomization to 4 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Self-reported severity of low back pain (changes over time and differences between groups)
Baseline, Months (1-4)
Workplace reported severity of low back pain (differences between groups)
Continuously from randomization to 4 months
Self-reported intensity of global pain (changes over time and differences between groups)
Baseline, Months (1-4)
Self-reported intensity of localized body discomfort (changes over time and differences between groups)
Baseline, Months (1-4)
Self-reported perception of physical fatigue and effort (changes over time and differences between groups)
Baseline, Months (1-4)
Other Outcomes (1)
Perceived intervention satisfaction, job productivity, device usability, and device adverse events (changes over time and differences between groups)
Baseline, Months (1-4)
Study Arms (2)
Exosuit
EXPERIMENTALExosuit refers to a soft active back exosuit. Participants in the exosuit arm will be fitted to a personal back exosuit device. Participants will be trained on how to use the device (retrieval, donning, powering up, mode switching, and doffing). Participants will be instructed to use the device at work, emphasizing they wear it whenever it seems practical (e.g. lifting) for as long as it remains comfortable. Associates from Verve Motion will check in with exosuit participants to address comfort issues and help participants integrate the exosuit into their workday.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONControl participants will not be assigned a back exosuit. Participants in the control group will perform workplace tasks as normal, completing study surveys at baseline and monthly for 4 months that are identical to exosuit group.
Interventions
The back exosuit is a soft wearable robotic suit designed to improve a wearer physiology, kinetics, kinematics to reduce the possibility of injury. The back exosuit is primarily composed of textiles that wrap around an individual's shoulder (backpack) and thighs (thigh wrap) to serve as anchor points. An actuating element attaches to those anchor elements to provide assistive forces while the user performs a physical activity. The soft wearable robot integrates sensing components to be able to detect user biomechanics and device function and actuating elements via algorithms that command the actuation based on users' intent. To encourage usability, the device is easy to don and intuitive to use. This back exosuit has demonstrated significant reductions in back (18%), hip (11%) and knee (22%) extensor muscle activity during a 1-hour workplace simulation task when compared to lifting without a suit.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old
- Works as a full-time (\>35 hours/ week) employee for our Industrial Partner
- Regularly bends, lifts, or lowers objects below hip height \>50% of their working day for multiple periods lasting more than 1 hour without sitting
- Can read and speak in English
- Has internet access
- Has completed an Exosuit Shift Demonstration
- Thigh circumference is \> 19" and \< 32"
- Back length (Neck to Iliac Crest) is \>18"
You may not qualify if:
- Temporary workers not directly employed by our Industrial Partner
- Diagnosed or self-reported sensory motor disorders (stroke, Parkinson's disease, ALS, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, etc.)
- Use of a pacemaker or other powered, implanted medical devices
- Medical condition that would make the participant likely to break bones (i.e., osteoporosis or osteopenia)
- Spinal fracture in the past 2 years
- Spinal surgery at multiple vertebral levels in the participant's lifetime, including vertebroplasty but excluding injections, such as steroids, nerve blockers, etc.
- Sought medical care for spinal surgery at a single vertebral level in the past 2 years, including vertebroplasty but excluding injections, such as steroids, nerve blockers, etc.
- Current malignant cancer
- Currently pregnant
- Skin issues / sensitivity that an exosuit could exacerbate (e.g., thin skin, sensitive skin, easy rashing, easy bruising or skin conditions, Epidermolysis Bullosa, etc.)
- A current episode of upper back or neck pain, requiring modified duties at work
- A recent episode of LBP resulting in pain (sharp, shooting, burning), radiating below one or both legs (past mid-thigh) in the last 3 months (e.g., sciatica)
- A recent episode of back pain resulting in time off work, modified duties, or seeking medical attention in the last 3 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Wyss Institute at Harvard Universitylead
- Boston Universitycollaborator
- Liberty Mutualcollaborator
- Verve Motioncollaborator
- University of Delawarecollaborator
- Industrial Partnercollaborator
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Undisclosed Location
Louisville, Kentucky, 40165, United States
Related Publications (4)
Quirk DA, Chung J, Schiller G, Cherin JM, Arens P, Sherman DA, Zeligson ER, Dalton DM, Awad LN, Walsh CJ. Reducing Back Exertion and Improving Confidence of Individuals with Low Back Pain with a Back Exosuit: A Feasibility Study for Use in BACPAC. Pain Med. 2023 Aug 4;24(Suppl 1):S175-S186. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad003.
PMID: 36794907BACKGROUNDZelik KE, Nurse CA, Schall MC Jr, Sesek RF, Marino MC, Gallagher S. An ergonomic assessment tool for evaluating the effect of back exoskeletons on injury risk. Appl Ergon. 2022 Feb;99:103619. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103619. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
PMID: 34740072BACKGROUNDHedge A, Morimoto S, McCrobie D. Effects of keyboard tray geometry on upper body posture and comfort. Ergonomics. 1999 Oct;42(10):1333-49. doi: 10.1080/001401399184983.
PMID: 10582503BACKGROUNDBaldassarre A, Lulli LG, Cavallo F, Fiorini L, Mariniello A, Mucci N, Arcangeli G. Industrial exoskeletons from bench to field: Human-machine interface and user experience in occupational settings and tasks. Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;10:1039680. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1039680. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 36478728BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Because of the transparency of a back exosuit, it is not feasible to blind participants and study team members. However, an independent blind statistician will perform our primary intention to treat analysis on our primary outcome measures. The statistician will perform analysis consistent with our statistical analysis plan, transforming data prior to knowledge of group assignment. Additional secondary analysis will be performed on open labeled data.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2023
First Posted
April 7, 2023
Study Start
February 8, 2023
Primary Completion
April 26, 2025
Study Completion
April 26, 2025
Last Updated
May 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- Data will be uploaded to the DAC approximately 6 months to 1 year at study completion. Data may be stored in the DAC indefinitely.
- Access Criteria
- Formal approval from the BACPAC DAC.
Data collected in this study are part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) Initiative. As part of the Back Pain Consortium (BACPAC) data form this study will be submitted to the Data Integration, Algorithm Development and Operations Management Center (DAC) following study completion. Researchers will have the possibility to request data from the DAC.