NCT05802784

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare in participant population ( women with uterine septum meeting the inclusion criteria) hysteroscopic septoplasty by resectoscope compared to hysteroscopic septoplasty with scissors. The main questions to answer are: Is there a difference in operative time ? Is there a difference in fluid used and fluid deficit? Is there a difference in complications? Is there a difference in reproductive outcome? Researchers will compare the 2 different techniques to see if there is any difference in operative outcome ( operative time, fluid used and deficit, need for second intervention, and operative and postoperative complications) and reproductive outcome.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 16, 2020

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2023

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 21, 2023

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 22, 2023

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 7, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 10, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

March 22, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 6, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Operative time

    During surgery

  • Fluid deficit

    During surgery

  • Operative and post operative complications

    3 months follow up after intervention

  • Need for second intervention

    3 months follow up after intervention

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Pregnancy rate

    At least 6 months follow up after intervention

  • Live birth rate

    Follow up until the end of first clinical pregnancy or 6 months after surgery

Study Arms (2)

Scissors arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in this group had undergone resection of the septum with hysteroscope and scissors, The scissors used was pointed, single action and semi rigid . Saline was used as the distending medium in the scissors group. Septal incision was carried out using shortening technique by incising the septum at the leading edge and continue dividing by moving from side to side (in narrow septum), or by thinning technique by which incisions will be made along each side of the septum alternately from one cornual end to the other (in broad septum). The operation was stopped if the fluid deficit exceeded 2500 ml of saline.

Procedure: Hysteroscopic septoplasty with scissors

Resectoscope arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in this group had undergone resection of the septum with Monopolar 26 French resectoscope Dilation of cervical os with Hegar's dilator (up to hegar 8 or 9) , incision of the septum using a resectoscope with the Collins knife, monopolar energy (cut 40-70 Watt) and glycine 1.5% as the distension medium, using shortening or thinning incision. The operation was stopped if the fluid deficit exceeded 1000 ml of glycine. The delivery of distension media was conducted by automated pressure delivery system. All patients were prescribed cyclic estrogen and progesterone for two months.

Procedure: Hysteroscopic septoplasty with resectoscope

Interventions

In hysteroscopic septoplasty with scissors arm, incision of the septum was done by continuous flow hysteroscopy and scissors using saline as distension media.

Scissors arm

In hysteroscopic septoplasty with resectoscope arm, incision of the septum was done by 26 Fr monopolar resectoscope with collin's knife using glycine1.5% as distension media.

Resectoscope arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Women of reproductive age
  • Seeking conception
  • Diagnosis of a septate or subseptate uterus
  • A history of one of the following:
  • Recurrent pregnancy loss
  • Subfertility
  • Preterm Birth

You may not qualify if:

  • Not seeking conception
  • Diagnosis of septate or subseptate uterus with no history of any of the following:
  • Recurrent pregnancy loss
  • Subfertility
  • Preterm Birth
  • Contraindications for surgery
  • Those who refused to participate.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of medicine, Mansoura university

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, 35511, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Septate UterusInfertility

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Uterine Duplication AnomaliesUterine DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant lecturer of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2023

First Posted

April 7, 2023

Study Start

June 16, 2020

Primary Completion

March 1, 2023

Study Completion

March 21, 2023

Last Updated

April 10, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Locations