NCT05801458

Brief Summary

Evaluation of Resin Composite Posterior Restorations Using Modeling Resin Insertion Technique versus Conventional Composite Placement Technique in Class I Lesions: Randomized Clinical Trial

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2023

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 13, 2023

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 6, 2023

Completed
25 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2023

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 6, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

March 13, 2023

Last Update Submit

March 24, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from baseline in Marginal Discoloration at 3,6,12 & 18 months

    Modified US Public Health Service criteria. Possible scores range from alpha (Excellent) to delta (Immediate replacement necessary).

    T1: 3 months • T2: 6 months • T3: 12 months • T4: 18 months

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Change from baseline in Marginal Integrity at 3,6,12 & 18 months

    T1: 3 months • T2: 6 months • T3: 12 months • T4: 18 months

  • Change from baseline in Color Match at 3,6,12 & 18 months

    T1: 3 months • T2: 6 months • T3: 12 months • T4: 18 months

  • Change from baseline in Surface Roughness at 3,6,12 & 18 months

    T1: 3 months • T2: 6 months • T3: 12 months • T4: 18 months

  • Change from baseline in Anatomic form (wear) at 3,6,12 & 18 months

    T1: 3 months • T2: 6 months • T3: 12 months • T4: 18 months

  • Change from baseline in Retention of Restoration at 3,6,12 & 18 months

    T1: 3 months • T2: 6 months • T3: 12 months • T4: 18 months

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Modeling Resin Insertion Technique

EXPERIMENTAL

Resin Composite (Tetric® N-Ceram Nano-hybrid incremental composite) / Wetting Agent (Modeling Resin, Bisco)

Procedure: Modeling Resin Insertion Technique

Conventional Resin Composite Incremental Placement Technique

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Conventional resin composite incremental placement technique (Tetric® N-Ceram Nano-hybrid incremental composite)

Procedure: Conventional resin composite Incremental Placement Technique

Interventions

One drop of modeling resin will be dispensed into a clean mixing well. Following the placement of the resin composite into the prepared site, a composite instrument (round-ended plugger with a diameter of 2 mm) will be dipped into the modeling resin. With modeling resin on the instrument, the resin composite is sculpted and manipulated to the desired shape. This will be repeated with each increment. Each increment will be polymerized for 20 sec with a LED light-curing unit.

Modeling Resin Insertion Technique

A three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system will be used according to the manufacturer's instructions. 37.5% phosphoric acid (Kerr Co, Orange, CA, USA) will be applied to the enamel and dentin for a period of 30 s and 15 s, respectively. Subsequently the cavities will then be rinsed with an air/water spray for 15 s. A layer of primer will be applied to the dentin for 30 sec, afterward gentle air-drying for 5 sec. Then, the bond (AdheSE adhesive) will be applied on the enamel and dentin and light cured with a LED curing unit for about 30 sec. Tetric N-Ceram will then be applied using an incremental filling technique, each increment will not exceed 2mm in thickness. Each increment will be polymerized for 20 sec with a LED light-curing unit.

Conventional Resin Composite Incremental Placement Technique

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants:
  • Adult Patients (25-45).
  • Good oral hygiene (plaque index score 0 or 1).
  • Absence of damaging habits (e.g. bruxism, nail biting, tooth clenching and mouth breathing).
  • Teeth:
  • Vital teeth with a normal appearance and morphology.
  • Primary carious lesions in molar teeth.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants:
  • Patients with bad oral hygiene.
  • Patients with known allergic or adverse reaction to the tested materials.
  • Any uncontrolled systemic disease, pregnant or lactating women and any patient incapable to be present at recall follow up visits.
  • Teeth:
  • Non-vital, fractured, or cracked teeth.
  • Teeth with secondary caries or in need of replacement of existing restorations.
  • Defective restorations adjacent to or opposite the tooth restored in the study.
  • Rampant caries, atypical extrinsic staining of teeth.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (19)

  • Barcellos DC, Pucci CR, Torres CR, Goto EH, Inocencio AC. Effects of resinous monomers used in restorative dental modeling on the cohesive strength of composite resin. J Adhes Dent. 2008 Oct;10(5):351-4.

    PMID: 19058680BACKGROUND
  • Bayraktar ET, Atali PY, Korkut B, Kesimli EG, Tarcin B, Turkmen C. Effect of Modeling Resins on Microhardness of Resin Composites. Eur J Dent. 2021 Jul;15(3):481-487. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1725577. Epub 2021 May 26.

    PMID: 34041724BACKGROUND
  • Burke FJ, Crisp RJ, James A, Mackenzie L, Pal A, Sands P, Thompson O, Palin WM. Two year clinical evaluation of a low-shrink resin composite material in UK general dental practices. Dent Mater. 2011 Jul;27(7):622-30. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.02.012. Epub 2011 Apr 22.

    PMID: 21514654BACKGROUND
  • Dionysopoulos D, Papadopoulos C, Koliniotou-Koumpia E. The evaluation of various restoration techniques on internal adaptation of composites in class v cavities. Int J Biomater. 2014;2014:148057. doi: 10.1155/2014/148057. Epub 2014 Oct 2.

    PMID: 25349611BACKGROUND
  • Furuse AY, Gordon K, Rodrigues FP, Silikas N, Watts DC. Colour-stability and gloss-retention of silorane and dimethacrylate composites with accelerated aging. J Dent. 2008 Nov;36(11):945-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.08.001. Epub 2008 Sep 7.

    PMID: 18778884BACKGROUND
  • He Z, Shimada Y, Tagami J. The effects of cavity size and incremental technique on micro-tensile bond strength of resin composite in Class I cavities. Dent Mater. 2007 May;23(5):533-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.012. Epub 2006 May 24.

    PMID: 16725190BACKGROUND
  • Ilie N, Kessler A, Durner J. Influence of various irradiation processes on the mechanical properties and polymerisation kinetics of bulk-fill resin based composites. J Dent. 2013 Aug;41(8):695-702. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 May 21.

    PMID: 23707645BACKGROUND
  • Jefferies SR. Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry: a state-of-the-art review. Dent Clin North Am. 2007 Apr;51(2):379-97, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2006.12.002.

    PMID: 17532918BACKGROUND
  • Kohler B, Rasmusson CG, Odman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. J Dent. 2000 Feb;28(2):111-6. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(99)00059-7.

    PMID: 10666968BACKGROUND
  • Munchow EA, Sedrez-Porto JA, Piva E, Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS. Use of dental adhesives as modeler liquid of resin composites. Dent Mater. 2016 Apr;32(4):570-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

    PMID: 26850844BACKGROUND
  • Nahsan FP, Mondelli RF, Franco EB, Naufel FS, Ueda JK, Schmitt VL, Baseggio W. Clinical strategies for esthetic excellence in anterior tooth restorations: understanding color and composite resin selection. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Mar-Apr;20(2):151-6. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000200005.

    PMID: 22666829BACKGROUND
  • Rees JS, Jagger DC, Williams DR, Brown G, Duguid W. A reappraisal of the incremental packing technique for light cured composite resins. J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Jan;31(1):81-4. doi: 10.1046/j.0305-182x.2003.01073.x.

    PMID: 15125602BACKGROUND
  • Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015 Jul;43(7):765-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

    PMID: 25882585BACKGROUND
  • Sedrez-Porto JA, Munchow EA, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Translucency and color stability of resin composite and dental adhesives as modeling liquids - A one-year evaluation. Braz Oral Res. 2017 Jul 3;31:e54. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0054.

    PMID: 28678973BACKGROUND
  • Sirin Karaarslan E, Bulbul M, Yildiz E, Secilmis A, Sari F, Usumez A. Effects of different polishing methods on color stability of resin composites after accelerated aging. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(1):58-67. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2012-045.

    PMID: 23370871BACKGROUND
  • Suneelkumar C, Harshala P, Madhusudhana K, Lavanya A, Subha A, Swapna S. Clinical performance of class I cavities restored with bulk fill composite at a 1-year follow-up using the FDI criteria: a randomized clinical trial. Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Apr 16;46(2):e24. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e24. eCollection 2021 May.

    PMID: 34123760BACKGROUND
  • Tanaka A, Nakajima M, Seki N, Foxton RM, Tagami J. The effect of tooth age on colour adjustment potential of resin composite restorations. J Dent. 2015 Feb;43(2):253-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Sep 19.

    PMID: 25242100BACKGROUND
  • Tuncer S, Demirci M, Tiryaki M, Unlu N, Uysal O. The effect of a modeling resin and thermocycling on the surface hardness, roughness, and color of different resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013 Dec;25(6):404-19. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12063. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

    PMID: 24172016BACKGROUND
  • van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. A 7-year randomized prospective study of a one-step self-etching adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. The effect of curing modes and restorative material. J Dent. 2012 Dec;40(12):1060-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.017. Epub 2012 Sep 3.

    PMID: 22955004BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Mostafa Abdelhamid, Professor-Cairo University

    Cairo University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Amira Mohamed, BDS, MSA University (2017)

CONTACT

Dina El Kady, PhD -Cairo University

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Operator, main investigator and corresponding author

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2023

First Posted

April 6, 2023

Study Start

May 1, 2023

Primary Completion

May 1, 2023

Study Completion

November 1, 2024

Last Updated

April 6, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03