Novel Protocol for Supportive Periodontal Therapy
GBM
Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Protocol (Guided Biofilm Management) for Supportive Periodontal Therapy: a Long-term Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) succeeds the active phase of periodontal therapy. SPT includes repeated supra- and subgingival scaling and root planing (SRP) at all sites with bleeding on probing and pocket depths ≥ 4-5 mm. Despite the fact that this treatment approach has been proven to be extremely successful, on a long-time basis, it is associated with substantial hard tissue loss (i.e. root cementum and dentin) that may lead to an increase in hypersensitivity, weakening of the tooth and even endodontic complications. Therefore, a novel treatment concept (Guided Biofilm Management or GBM) consisting of removal of all soft supra- and subgingival bacterial deposits by means of an erythritol powder air-polishing, followed by the local, precise removal of supra and subgingival hard deposits (e.g. calculus) and subsequent use of another sub- and supragingival erythritol powder air-polishing, has been introduced. Here, the investigators will compare this novel concept (GBM) with the conventional care during SPT using hand curettes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 23, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 5, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 19, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 19, 2025
CompletedJune 22, 2025
June 1, 2025
3.5 years
December 23, 2022
June 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in bleeding on probing
This is a categorical variable defined as the percentage of bleeding sites out of the total number of sites. Hereby, all gingival sulci and pockets will be measured with a periodontal probe and bleeding sites will be recorded. The maximum is 100% and the minimum 0%. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Over the study period of 3 years at every recall (i.e. every 6 months)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in probing pocket depth
Over the study duration of 3 years at every recall (i.e. every 6 months)
Clinical attachment level
At the beginning of the study, after 1 year and after 3 years
Patient comfort
Over the study duration after 1, 2, and 3 years
Time effectiveness
Over the study duration of 3 years at every recall (i.e. every 6-months)
Study Arms (2)
Control (standard protocol)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group will be treated according to standard protocols of the Department of Periodontology of the university of Bern and receive conventional scaling and root planing. Supra- and subgingival hard and soft tissue deposits are being removed by means of hand instruments and ultra-sonic scalers followed by rubber cup polishing. All patients will have 2 visits per year. At each visit outcome measures will be assessed by masked dentists.
Test (Guided Biofilm management)
EXPERIMENTALThe test group will be treated according to a novel treatment concept (Guided biofilm management, GBM): 1. Staining of all tooth surfaces to detect soft and hard deposits. 2. Removal of supra- and subgingival hard and soft bacterial deposits by means of an erythritol powder air-polishing. 3. If present, the supra- and subgingival hard deposits (e.g. calculus) will be removed by means of a slim ultrasonic tip (Piezon PS, EMS, Nyon Switzerland) without any additional use of hand instruments. 4. Another sub- and supragingival application of erythritol powder air-polishing without any rubber cup polishing. All patients will have 2 visits per year. At each visit outcome measures will be assessed by masked dentists.
Interventions
The control group will be treated according to standard protocols of the Department of Periodontology of the university of Bern and receive conventional scaling and root planing. Supra- and subgingival hard and soft tissue deposits are being removed by means of hand instruments and ultra-sonic scalers followed by rubber cup polishing. All patients will have 2 visits per year. At each visit outcome measures will be assessed by masked dentists.
The test group will be treated according to a novel treatment concept (Guided biofilm management, GBM): 1. Staining of all tooth surfaces to detect soft and hard deposits. 2. Removal of supra- and subgingival hard and soft bacterial deposits by means of an erythritol powder air-polishing. 3. If present, the supra- and subgingival hard deposits (e.g. calculus) will be removed by means of a slim ultrasonic tip (Piezon PS, EMS, Nyon Switzerland) without any additional use of hand instruments. 4. Another sub- and supragingival application of erythritol powder air-polishing without any rubber cup polishing. All patients will have 2 visits per year. At each visit outcome measures will be assessed by masked dentists.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written informed consent
- Patient adherent to supportive periodontal therapy
- With \< 6 mm probing pocket depth (PPD)
You may not qualify if:
- Clinically significant concomitant diseases
- Enrolment in a clinical trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Periodontology, University of Bern
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
Related Publications (2)
Hagi TT, Hofmanner P, Eick S, Donnet M, Salvi GE, Sculean A, Ramseier CA. The effects of erythritol air-polishing powder on microbiologic and clinical outcomes during supportive periodontal therapy: Six-month results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Quintessence Int. 2015 Jan;46(1):31-41. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a32817.
PMID: 25262675BACKGROUNDHagi TT, Klemensberger S, Bereiter R, Nietzsche S, Cosgarea R, Flury S, Lussi A, Sculean A, Eick S. A Biofilm Pocket Model to Evaluate Different Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Modalities in Terms of Biofilm Removal and Reformation, Surface Alterations and Attachment of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 29;10(6):e0131056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131056. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26121365RESULT
Related Links
- Standardized human dentin specimens were colonized by multi-species biofilms for 3.5 days and subsequently treated as follows: a) hand-instrumentation b) ultrasonication c) air-polishing using erythritol and d) erythritol combined with chlor
- 40 chronic periodontitis patients previously enrolled in SPT were randomly assigned into two groups for the treatment with subgingival EPAP or repeated scaling and root planing (SRP).
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anton Sculean, Prof.
University of Bern
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 23, 2022
First Posted
April 5, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2022
Primary Completion
June 19, 2025
Study Completion
June 19, 2025
Last Updated
June 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06