Randomized Control Trial Comparing CMPAT and MAT for Lumbar Puncture
Computerized Modified Paramedian Approach Technique(CMPAT) Versus Conventional Midline Approach Technique(MAT) of Lumbar Puncture: A Randomized Control Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The lumbar puncture (LP) technique is a widely utilized method for diagnosis and treatment purposes. Recently, the paramedian approach technique (PAT) has garnered increasing interest due to its advantages over the midline approach technique (MAT), which has traditionally been used for LP in clinical practice . Utilizing digital virtual human and computer simulation techniques, a new path has been proposed for the computerized modified paramedian approach technique (CMPAT). As such, the objective of the present study is to present a randomized controlled trial (RCT) protocol to investigate and compare the effects of CMPAT versus MAT in patients requiring LP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 3, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 30, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2024
CompletedAugust 3, 2023
April 1, 2023
9 months
March 21, 2023
August 2, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of puncture attempts in case of successful LP
1 day
LP success rate
1 day
Study Arms (2)
Computerized Modified Paramedian Approach Technique
EXPERIMENTALThe L3-4 inter-laminar space will be selected as the target for puncture, and in the longitudinal direction, 1.0-1.5cm will be opened beside the upper edge of the spinous process (tip) of the lower vertebra as the entry point. The lumbar puncture needle will be inserted vertically along the axis of the anesthesia needle. The puncture path will be maintained completely perpendicular to the skin until the needle reached the PLTLF (posterior layer of the thoracolumbar fascia), where some resistance will be felt. The puncture direction is adjusted as needed. The tip of the needle will be tilted 20±10° in the sagittal direction and 15±5° inward such that the tip will point at the midpoint of the spinal canal. After the needle reaches the PLTLF, it will be further inserted 3-7 cm.
Conventional Midline Approach Technique
EXPERIMENTALPuncture will be performed on the posterior median line near the midpoint of the L3-4 Space of spinous process. The lumbar puncture needle will be inserted vertically along the axis of the anesthesia needle, or the tip of the needle will be tilted 15° in the sagittal direction toward the head, so that the needle path is parallel to the space of spinous process.
Interventions
Computerized Modified Paramedian Approach Technique ( CMPAT )
Conventional Midline Approach Technique
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18-70 years. Indication for LP.(Diagnostic lumbar puncture:Cerebrospinal fluid composition analysis,Cerebrospinal fluid pressure measurement;Cerebrospinal fluid release or lumbar Contiuous drainage of fluid,Intrathecal injection of lumbar cistern, etc.) Informed consent. Sufficient knowledge of the Chinese language to complete forms and follow instructions independently.
You may not qualify if:
- Cerebral hernia or high Cerebrospinal fluid pressure that might lead to Cerebral hernia.
- Treatment with oral anticoagulant or anti-small plate(3 days or less)or coagulation disorders, various factors leading to a higher risk of bleeding.
- Local infection or skin breakdown. Previous surgery on Lumbar spine segments. Pregnancy or lactation Severe somatic or psychiatric illness.(Severe anxiety or depression, etc.) Failure to be followed up as needed or worries about the potential risks of the study.
- Failure to provide written informed consent or follow the protocol requirements.
- Expected survival time being less than 1 month. Plan to emigrate within 1 month. Other conditions that are unsuitable for clinical research.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The involvement of patients and the public was not or will not be included in the design, implementation, reporting or dissemination of the research.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2023
First Posted
April 3, 2023
Study Start
June 30, 2023
Primary Completion
March 30, 2024
Study Completion
June 30, 2024
Last Updated
August 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share