Effects o Laughing Qigong Program on Psychological Outcomes and the Physiological Immunological Responses
Effects of a 12-week Laughing Qigong Program on Psychological Outcomes and the Physiological Immunological Responses Among Female Breast Cancer Survivors: A Quasi-experimental Nonequivalent Control Group
1 other identifier
interventional
71
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Laughter programs are safe, affordable, and age-appropriate activities. Few studies have utilized mixed study designs to look at the impact on resilience in and experiences of participants in such activities.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 30, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 29, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 29, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 31, 2023
CompletedMarch 31, 2023
March 1, 2023
12 months
March 20, 2023
March 20, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Resilience scale
This scale is used to assess an individual's resilience to setbacks. There is a total of 25 items. For each item, the Likert five-point scale is used, with scores ranging from 1 (extremely dissatisfied) to 5 (extremely satisfied) (very satisfied). The higher the score, the more resilient to frustration. The scale was divided into five items, the higher the score, which are a meaningful life, a peaceful mind, self-confidence, an indomitable spirit, and acceptance of the loneliness of existence (Wagnild, \& Young, 1993).The psychometric evaluation of this scale supports its internal consistency reliability and concurrent validity as a good tool for measuring resilience (Wagnild, \& Young, 1993), and the scale has also been translated into Chinese and demonstrates good reliability (α=0.91) and validity.
Pre-intervention(T0)]
Pre-intervention(T0)]
The Thai Mental Health Indicator (TMHI) Scale was used to assess one's mental health, the indicator has 15 items divided into four categories: mental state, mental capacity, mental equality, and social support (Mongkol, Tangseree, Udomratn, Huttapanom, \& Chuta, 2007; Songprakun and McCann 2012). Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (never) to 3, with a total score of 45 points indicating better well-being outcomes. The scale has good reliability and construct validity (Mongkol, Tangseree, Udomratn, Huttapanom, \& Chuta, 2007), and it was used by two-way translation and showed excellent reliability (0.90) in this study. This scale is used after the second stage translation was completed and confirming when the sentences be smooth and the meaning
Pre-intervention(T0)]
Resilience Scale
This scale is used to assess an individual's resilience to setbacks. There is a total of 25 items. For each item, the Likert five-point scale is used, with scores ranging from 1 (extremely dissatisfied) to 5 (extremely satisfied) (very satisfied). The higher the score, the more resilient to frustration. The scale was divided into five items, the higher the score, which are a meaningful life, a peaceful mind, self-confidence, an indomitable spirit, and acceptance of the loneliness of existence (Wagnild, \& Young, 1993).The psychometric evaluation of this scale supports its internal consistency reliability and concurrent validity as a good tool for measuring resilience (Wagnild, \& Young, 1993), and the scale has also been translated into Chinese and demonstrates good reliability (α=0.91) and validity
5-week after intervention (T1)]
Resilience Scale
This scale is used to assess an individual's resilience to setbacks. There is a total of 25 items. For each item, the Likert five-point scale is used, with scores ranging from 1 (extremely dissatisfied) to 5 (extremely satisfied) (very satisfied). The higher the score, the more resilient to frustration. The scale was divided into five items, the higher the score, which are a meaningful life, a peaceful mind, self-confidence, an indomitable spirit, and acceptance of the loneliness of existence (Wagnild, \& Young, 1993).The psychometric evaluation of this scale supports its internal consistency reliability and concurrent validity as a good tool for measuring resilience (Wagnild, \& Young, 1993), and the scale has also been translated into Chinese and demonstrates good reliability (α=0.91) and validity
12-week after intervention (T2)]
Thai Mental Health Indicator (TMHI)
The Thai Mental Health Indicator (TMHI) Scale was used to assess one's mental health, the indicator has 15 items divided into four categories: mental state, mental capacity, mental equality, and social support (Mongkol, Tangseree, Udomratn, Huttapanom, \& Chuta, 2007; Songprakun and McCann 2012). Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (never) to 3, with a total score of 45 points indicating better well-being outcomes. The scale has good reliability and construct validity (Mongkol, Tangseree, Udomratn, Huttapanom, \& Chuta, 2007), and it was used by two-way translation and showed excellent reliability (0.90) in this study. This scale is used after the second stage translation was completed and confirming when the sentences be smooth and the meaning.
5-week after intervention (T1)]
Thai Mental Health Indicator (TMHI)
The Thai Mental Health Indicator (TMHI) Scale was used to assess one's mental health, the indicator has 15 items divided into four categories: mental state, mental capacity, mental equality, and social support (Mongkol, Tangseree, Udomratn, Huttapanom, \& Chuta, 2007; Songprakun and McCann 2012). Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (never) to 3, with a total score of 45 points indicating better well-being outcomes. The scale has good reliability and construct validity (Mongkol, Tangseree, Udomratn, Huttapanom, \& Chuta, 2007), and it was used by two-way translation and showed excellent reliability (0.90) in this study. This scale is used after the second stage translation was completed and confirming when the sentences be smooth and the meaning.
12-week after intervention (T2)]
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Mucosal immunity (secretory(s)-IgA) immunoglobulin A
Pre-intervention(T0)]
Mucosal immunity (secretory(s)-IgA) immunoglobulin A
5-week after intervention (T1)]
Mucosal immunity (secretory(s)-IgA) immunoglobulin A
12-week after intervention (T2)]
Saliva Interleukin-6 (IL-6
Pre-intervention(T0)]
Saliva Interleukin-6 (IL-6
5-week after intervention (T1)]
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
the principle of laughter plus Qigong
EXPERIMENTALThe basic method of " LQP " is the principle of laughter plus Qigong, combined with the sound of laughter, stretching the body, thereby activating the parasympathetic nerve, so that the body can automatically relax, and at the same time guide the individual to face their own emotions when facing pressure, and transform emotions into positive energy or relieve negative emotions through practice, so as to achieve the energy balance of body, mind and spirit.
their current lifestyle for a 12-week
NO INTERVENTIONAfter baseline testing, participants in the waitlist control group (CON) were asked to maintain their current lifestyle for a 12-week. Participants in the CON group will then undergo a 12-week fully supervised intervention.
Interventions
The intervention program include muscle stretching, breathing exercises, and closing exercises. The laughing practice method begins with a warm-up consisting of laughing to stretch the body, yawning, and exerting the voice, and ends with expelling all the "qi" in order to return to natural movements and return to taking care of your body and mind (He et al., 2021). The LQP program meets once a week for 90 minutes and runs for 12 weeks. The program content: the laughter skills were 50-60 minutes, the feedback was 30 minutes, and relaxation was 10 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \) female adult (18 years old); 2) diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer; 3) major treatment completed at least 3 months ago (i.e. surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy); and 4) no communication difficulties (visual and auditory).
You may not qualify if:
- \) having recurrent or metastatic breast cancer; 2) being involved in other studies at the same time, 3) patients who are unable to cooperate with the trial and follow-up; and 4) having a history of mental illness in past 3 months (major depression disorder)..
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
Taipei, 112303, Taiwan
Related Publications (20)
Luo C, Li N, Lu B, Cai J, Lu M, Zhang Y, Chen H, Dai M. Global and regional trends in incidence and mortality of female breast cancer and associated factors at national level in 2000 to 2019. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Jan 5;135(1):42-51. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001814.
PMID: 34593698RESULTSung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
PMID: 33538338RESULTCarreira H, Williams R, Funston G, Stanway S, Bhaskaran K. Associations between breast cancer survivorship and adverse mental health outcomes: A matched population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom. PLoS Med. 2021 Jan 7;18(1):e1003504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003504. eCollection 2021 Jan.
PMID: 33411711RESULTRottmann N, Dalton SO, Christensen J, Frederiksen K, Johansen C. Self-efficacy, adjustment style and well-being in breast cancer patients: a longitudinal study. Qual Life Res. 2010 Aug;19(6):827-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9653-1. Epub 2010 Apr 17.
PMID: 20401551RESULTBorgi M, Collacchi B, Ortona E, Cirulli F. Stress and coping in women with breast cancer:unravelling the mechanisms to improve resilience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Dec;119:406-421. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.011. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
PMID: 33086128RESULTEicher M, Ribi K, Senn-Dubey C, Senn S, Ballabeni P, Betticher D. Interprofessional, psycho-social intervention to facilitate resilience and reduce supportive care needs for patients with cancer: Results of a noncomparative, randomized phase II trial. Psychooncology. 2018 Jul;27(7):1833-1839. doi: 10.1002/pon.4734. Epub 2018 May 4.
PMID: 29655277RESULTAizpurua-Perez I, Perez-Tejada J. Resilience in women with breast cancer: A systematic review. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Dec;49:101854. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101854. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
PMID: 33120216RESULT8. Azhari, R., & Harkomah, I. (2021). Progressive muscle relaxation, spiritual guided imagery, music on coping and resilience among cancer patients who undergo chemotherapy. KnE Life Sciences, 344-355.
RESULTPlitzko L, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A, Gotze H. [Resilience in Long-Term Cancer Survivors - Associations with Psychological Distress and Sociodemographic Characteristics]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2020 May;70(5):182-189. doi: 10.1055/a-0927-6782. Epub 2019 Jul 17. German.
PMID: 31315142RESULTVan Puymbroeck M, Burk BN, Shinew KJ, Cronan Kuhlenschmidt M, Schmid AA. Perceived health benefits from yoga among breast cancer survivors. Am J Health Promot. 2013 May-Jun;27(5):308-15. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.110316-QUAL-119. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
PMID: 23402226RESULTLoprinzi CE, Prasad K, Schroeder DR, Sood A. Stress Management and Resilience Training (SMART) program to decrease stress and enhance resilience among breast cancer survivors: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Clin Breast Cancer. 2011 Dec;11(6):364-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
PMID: 21831722RESULTWang HH, Chung UL. Use of complementary and alternative medicine among breast cancer survivors in Taiwan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(9):4789-92. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.9.4789.
PMID: 23167421RESULTCorrea-Velez I, Clavarino A, Barnett AG, Eastwood H. Use of complementary and alternative medicine and quality of life: changes at the end of life. Palliat Med. 2003 Dec;17(8):695-703. doi: 10.1191/0269216303pm834oa.
PMID: 14694921RESULTMcEwen BS. The neurobiology of stress: from serendipity to clinical relevance. Brain Res. 2000 Dec 15;886(1-2):172-189. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02950-4.
PMID: 11119695RESULTMcEwen BS. Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: central role of the brain. Physiol Rev. 2007 Jul;87(3):873-904. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00041.2006.
PMID: 17615391RESULTHsieh CJ, Chang C, Tsai G, Wu HF. Empirical study of the influence of a Laughing Qigong Program on long-term care residents. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Feb;15(2):165-73. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12244. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
PMID: 24533887RESULT17. McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. Pearson.
RESULTWagnild GM, Young HM. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. J Nurs Meas. 1993 Winter;1(2):165-78.
PMID: 7850498RESULTSongprakun W, McCann TV. Evaluation of a cognitive behavioural self-help manual for reducing depression: a randomized controlled trial. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2012 Sep;19(7):647-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01861.x. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
PMID: 22260148RESULT20. Mongkol, A., Tangseree, T., Udomratn, P., Huttapanom, W., & Chuta, W. (2007). The development of Thai Mental Health Indicator (TMHI): from past to present. In The 3rd international conference on gross national happiness towards global transformation.
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chia Jung Hsieh, PhD
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences Taipei, Taipei City, Taiwan, 112303
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor) Blinded to group membership, research assistants collected data from both groups.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ph.D., RN, Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2023
First Posted
March 31, 2023
Study Start
December 30, 2013
Primary Completion
December 29, 2014
Study Completion
December 29, 2014
Last Updated
March 31, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share