NCT05786313

Brief Summary

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of individualized, precise and standardized open-door posterior cervical surgery through a single-center, exploratory clinical study, so as to provide a more reliable basis for the treatment of cervical spinal stenosis.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
500

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2023

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 27, 2023

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

April 9, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

March 1, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 6, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

cervical spinal stenosisopen angle

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • JOA score change

    Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score is used to assess the function of spinal cord which is in the form of questionnaires. Postoperative improvement rate = ((postoperative score - preoperative score)/ (17- preoperative score)) X100%. Improvement rate can also correspond to the commonly used efficacy criteria: cure when the improvement rate is 100%, effective when the improvement rate is greater than 60%, effective when 25-60%, and ineffective when less than 25%.

    pre-operation,3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 1 year after surgery

  • NDI score change

    Neck Disability Index (NDI) score is used to assess the disorder of spinal cord which is in the form of questionnaires. Postoperative improvement rate = (total score)/ (numbers of program X5) X100%. Improvement rate can also correspond to the commonly used efficacy criteria: the improvement rate when 60%-80% means extremely severe dysfunction, when 40%-60% means severe dysfunction, when 20-40% means moderate dysfunction, and when less than 20% means mild dysfunction.

    pre-operation,3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 1 year after surgery

  • VAS score

    A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is used to measure the amount of pain that a patient feels ranges across a continuum from none to an extreme amount of pain. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

    pre-operation,3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 1 year after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Maximum spinal cord compression change

    pre-operation,3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 1 year after surgery

  • Compression ratio change

    pre-operation,3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 1 year after surgery

  • Transverse area change

    pre-operation,3 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery, 1 year after surgery

Study Arms (2)

Centerpiece titanium plate

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

All surgical operations were performed by the same group of senior spine surgeons. The range of open door decompression involved C3 \~ C7. For convenient operation and more accurate statistics, the right side of the door axis and the left side of the door seam were selected for all operations. Centerpiece titanium plates were used for intraoperative fixation.

Procedure: Centerpiece titanium plate

3D printed arch titanium plate

EXPERIMENTAL

Before surgery, according to the imaging results, according to the effective imaging indicators screened in the early stage and the calculated door opening Angle formula, the door opening Angle of the patient's posterior cervical vertebra and the size of the fitted arch titanium plate were designed by mimics 10.0 software, and the titanium plate was printed using 3D printing technology. During the operation, the developed laminae opener was used to accurately control the door opening Angle and appropriate size titanium plate was installed for internal fixation. The standardized laminae door opening guide was used to complete the preparation of the door shaft side and door opening side of the lamina

Procedure: Centerpiece titanium plate

Interventions

All indexes were collected from the patients with Centerpiece titanium plate for internal fixation.

3D printed arch titanium plateCenterpiece titanium plate

Eligibility Criteria

Age28 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The age of 28-85 years old; Through systematic clinical and imaging examination, patients diagnosed with C3-7 multilevel cervical spondylitis myelopathy or cervical spinal stenosis who need to undergo posterior cervical open-door surgery.
  • No contraindications in preoperative routine tests and examinations.
  • Informed consent of patients.

You may not qualify if:

  • Cervical radiculopathy
  • Cervical kyphosis or instability
  • Cervical spondylosis caused by trauma, tumor, tuberculosis and metabolic diseases
  • Revision surgery or combined anterior-posterior surgery is required
  • Serious neurological diseases affect the postoperative effect evaluation
  • Mental illness cannot cooperate with follow-up
  • Contraindications for MRI examination
  • Patients themselves or their families do not agree to participate in the study
  • Other situations that are not suitable for study participation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Qi Wei

Xi'an, Shannxi Province, 710034, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (4)

  • Schmeiser G, Bergmann JI, Papavero L, Kothe R. Surgical Treatment of Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Open-Door Laminoplasty and Fixation via Unilateral Approach. A Feasibility Study. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2022 Sep;83(5):494-501. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739224. Epub 2021 Dec 15.

    PMID: 34911089BACKGROUND
  • Yeh KT, Lee RP, Chen IH, Yu TC, Liu KL, Peng CH, Wang JH, Wu WT. Laminoplasty instead of laminectomy as a decompression method in posterior instrumented fusion for degenerative cervical kyphosis with stenosis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Sep 4;10:138. doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0280-y.

    PMID: 26338009BACKGROUND
  • Chen H, Liu H, Zou L, Li T, Gong Q, Song Y, Zeng J, Liu L, Kong Q. Effect of Mini-plate Fixation on Hinge Fracture and Bony Fusion in Unilateral Open-door Cervical Expansive Laminoplasty. Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Jul;29(6):E288-95. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000131.

    PMID: 25023712BACKGROUND
  • Yuan W, Zhu Y, Liu X, Zhu H, Zhou X, Zhou R, Cui C, Li J. Postoperative three-dimensional cervical range of motion and neurological outcomes in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Jul;134:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

    PMID: 25929463BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2023

First Posted

March 27, 2023

Study Start

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion

December 31, 2025

Study Completion

December 31, 2025

Last Updated

April 9, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations