NCT05785455

Brief Summary

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of a complex intervention (COGMO intervention) compared with routine clinical practice in primary care physiotherapy to improve the intensity, severity of pain, and cervical disability in patients with chronic neck pain. Methodology: Design: Pragmatic cluster randomized trial with 12-month follow-up. The unit of randomization is the physiotherapist and the unit of analysis the patient. Scope: Madrid Primary Care health centers. Subjects: Patients 18-65 years old, with neck pain (\> 3 months), moderate-severe (\>30 mm in visual pain scale). Sample size: 142 patients (71 per branch). Sampling: consecutive of patients who are referred from the family doctor to the Primary Care physiotherapist. Intervention: COGMO Intervention Group (3 components: pain neuroscience communication, motivational interviewing and cognition targeted exercise therapy). Control group: Health education program. Variables: Main: Decrease in intensity of pain: yes / no (\> = 30mm on the visual pain scale). Secondary: Related to pain (severity of pain, modulation conditioned to pain, temporal summation, decrease in the disability index, related to psycho-emotional-social aspects: decrease in fear / avoidance behaviour, decrease in kinesiophobia (TSK) and Catastrophism (PCS). Quality of life (Euroqol). Sociodemographic, other treatments, adherence to intervention. Data collection: Baseline visit and 3 follow-up visits (3,6,12 months). Statistical analysis: Intention-to-treat analysis. Difference in the percentage of subjects who achieve success in the main variable at 12 months in the COGMO group compared to control group. A GEE logit model to adjust for other factors.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
142

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable chronic-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 15, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 27, 2023

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2024

Completed
13 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 14, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 9, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

November 15, 2022

Last Update Submit

May 8, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Chronic painPain neuroscience educationExercise therapyNeck painMotivational interviewing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Pain Intensity

    The visual analog scale (VAS). This is a 100-mm line with "no pain" on the left side of the line and "worst pain imaginable" on the right side. The patient marks the intensity of her pain on a flat line, which allows observing the result obtained on the 100 mm line, being able to quantify her pain in this way. A score of less than 30 mm is considered mild pain, between 31 and 54 mm, moderate, and 55 mm, severe.

    Up to 1 week before the intervention, up to 1 day after the intervention, and at 3, 6 and 12 months after intervention

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Change in Pain Severity

    Up to 1 week before the intervention, up to 1 day after the intervention, and at 3, 6 and 12 months after intervention

  • Change in Neck Disability

    Up to 1 week before the intervention, up to 1 day after the intervention, and at 3, 6 and 12 months after intervention

  • Change in Strait State Anxiety

    Up to 1 week before the intervention, up to 1 day after the intervention, and at 3, 6 and 12 months after intervention

  • Chage in Pain Related Anxiety

    Up to 1 week before the intervention, up to 1 day after the intervention, and at 3, 6 and 12 months after intervention

  • Change in Catastrophizing

    Up to 1 week before the intervention, up to 1 day after the intervention, and at 3, 6 and 12 months after intervention

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (6)

  • Patient Satisfaction

    Up to 1 week before the intervention, up to 1 day after the intervention, and at 3, 6 and 12 months after intervention

  • Drug Consumption

    Up to 1 week before the intervention, up to 1 day after the intervention, and at 3, 6 and 12 months after intervention

  • Days of Sick Leave

    Up to 1 week before the intervention, up to 1 day after the intervention, and at 3, 6 and 12 months after intervention

  • +3 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Usual care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects will receive a health education program during 5 group sessions of 60 minutes, taught by physical therapists without training in pain neuroscience education. All patients will receive 5 sessions, regardless of the group they belong to. Group education sessions will be in groups (of 5-6 patients), respecting the safety distance. Group sessions will be held in person, in small groups, at the health center, on a weekly basis. Both groups will receive online monitoring of the exercise program. An image with more information about the intervention and control is attached in Annex 2.

Other: Usual Care

COGMO Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Each subject will receive. a first individual session to assess their beliefs about pain and coping strategies, combining motivational interviewing and pain neuroscience education techniques, followed by 4 group sessions of 60 minutes, focused on the neurophysiology of pain and self-efficacy techniques in pain control, emphasizing . in two-way communication and followed by cognition targeted exercise therapy. These sessions will be taught by physiotherapists with specific training in motivational interviewing, pain neuroscience education and cognition targeted exercise

Other: COGMO Intervention

Interventions

Group sessions in which each patient, after motivational interviewing sessions will follow a goup education in pain neuroscince program followed by a cognition targeted exercise therapy

COGMO Intervention

Usual Primary Care health education and treatment for patients with chronic neck pain

Usual care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 18 and 65 years.
  • Diagnosed with chronic neck pain, according to the death of the IASP (International Association for the Study of Pain) with duration of pain greater than 3 months and referred to Physiotherapy by their Family doctor.
  • Score on the Neck Disability Index (IDC) questionnaire equal to or greater than 20% (10/50).
  • Pain intensity at the moment in the cervical region equal to or greater than 30mm on the visual analog scale.
  • Sign informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Neuropathies and/or radiculopathies, other pathologies or comorbidities that may contraindicate the therapies to be applied, severe depression, rheumatic, inflammatory diseases, cancer, suspected fibromyalgia, systemic diseases, serious psychological disorders, neck pain secondary to an accident of traffic.
  • Criteria for referral to surgery or failed spinal surgery.
  • Inability to read, understand and complete questionnaires; o understand and follow verbal commands.
  • Have received physical therapy in the last 3 months.
  • Have any pending legal action (for example: compensation for injury).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Gerencia de Atención Primaria de la Comunidad de Madrid

Madrid, 28035, Spain

Location

Related Publications (28)

  • Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain Suppl. 1986;3:S1-226. No abstract available.

    PMID: 3461421BACKGROUND
  • Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, Holm LW, Cassidy JD, Guzman J, Cote P, Haldeman S, Ammendolia C, Carragee E, Hurwitz E, Nordin M, Peloso P; Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. The burden and determinants of neck pain in the general population: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 15;33(4 Suppl):S39-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816454c8.

    PMID: 18204398BACKGROUND
  • Palacios-Cena D, Alonso-Blanco C, Hernandez-Barrera V, Carrasco-Garrido P, Jimenez-Garcia R, Fernandez-de-las-Penas C. Prevalence of neck and low back pain in community-dwelling adults in Spain: an updated population-based national study (2009/10-2011/12). Eur Spine J. 2015 Mar;24(3):482-92. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3567-5. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

    PMID: 25208501BACKGROUND
  • Hoving JL, Koes BW, de Vet HC, van der Windt DA, Assendelft WJ, van Mameren H, Deville WL, Pool JJ, Scholten RJ, Bouter LM. Manual therapy, physical therapy, or continued care by a general practitioner for patients with neck pain. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2002 May 21;136(10):713-22. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-10-200205210-00006.

    PMID: 12020139BACKGROUND
  • Bogduk N. The anatomy and pathophysiology of neck pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2011 Aug;22(3):367-82, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2011.03.008.

    PMID: 21824580BACKGROUND
  • Gerrits MMJG, van Oppen P, van Marwijk HWJ, Penninx BWJH, van der Horst HE. Pain and the onset of depressive and anxiety disorders. Pain. 2014 Jan;155(1):53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

    PMID: 24012953BACKGROUND
  • Borghouts JAJ, Koes BW, Vondeling H, Bouter LM. Cost-of-illness of neck pain in The Netherlands in 1996. Pain. 1999 Apr;80(3):629-636. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00268-1.

    PMID: 10342424BACKGROUND
  • D'Sylva J, Miller J, Gross A, Burnie SJ, Goldsmith CH, Graham N, Haines T, Bronfort G, Hoving JL; Cervical Overview Group. Manual therapy with or without physical medicine modalities for neck pain: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010 Oct;15(5):415-33. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 Jun 9.

    PMID: 20538501BACKGROUND
  • Gross A, Miller J, D'Sylva J, Burnie SJ, Goldsmith CH, Graham N, Haines T, Bronfort G, Hoving JL; COG. Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain: a Cochrane Review. Man Ther. 2010 Aug;15(4):315-33. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 May 26.

    PMID: 20510644BACKGROUND
  • Gross A, Kay TM, Paquin JP, Blanchette S, Lalonde P, Christie T, Dupont G, Graham N, Burnie SJ, Gelley G, Goldsmith CH, Forget M, Hoving JL, Bronfort G, Santaguida PL; Cervical Overview Group. Exercises for mechanical neck disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 28;1(1):CD004250. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004250.pub5.

    PMID: 25629215BACKGROUND
  • Sterling M, Jull G, Wright A. Cervical mobilisation: concurrent effects on pain, sympathetic nervous system activity and motor activity. Man Ther. 2001 May;6(2):72-81. doi: 10.1054/math.2000.0378.

    PMID: 11414776BACKGROUND
  • Fernandez-de-las-Penas C, Palomeque-del-Cerro L, Rodriguez-Blanco C, Gomez-Conesa A, Miangolarra-Page JC. Changes in neck pain and active range of motion after a single thoracic spine manipulation in subjects presenting with mechanical neck pain: a case series. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 May;30(4):312-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.03.007.

    PMID: 17509440BACKGROUND
  • O'Leary S, Falla D, Hodges PW, Jull G, Vicenzino B. Specific therapeutic exercise of the neck induces immediate local hypoalgesia. J Pain. 2007 Nov;8(11):832-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.05.014. Epub 2007 Jul 19.

    PMID: 17644487BACKGROUND
  • Oostendorp RA, Elvers H, Mikolajewska E, Laekeman M, van Trijffel E, Samwel H, Duquet W. Manual physical therapists' use of biopsychosocial history taking in the management of patients with back or neck pain in clinical practice. ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:170463. doi: 10.1155/2015/170463. Epub 2015 Apr 5.

    PMID: 25945358BACKGROUND
  • Crossley KM, Vicenzino B, Lentzos J, Schache AG, Pandy MG, Ozturk H, Hinman RS. Exercise, education, manual-therapy and taping compared to education for patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a blinded, randomised clinical trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Sep;23(9):1457-64. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.04.024. Epub 2015 May 7.

    PMID: 25960116BACKGROUND
  • Tellez-Garcia M, de-la-Llave-Rincon AI, Salom-Moreno J, Palacios-Cena M, Ortega-Santiago R, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. Neuroscience education in addition to trigger point dry needling for the management of patients with mechanical chronic low back pain: A preliminary clinical trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015 Jul;19(3):464-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 22.

    PMID: 26118519BACKGROUND
  • Meeus M, Nijs J, Hamers V, Ickmans K, Oosterwijck JV. The efficacy of patient education in whiplash associated disorders: a systematic review. Pain Physician. 2012 Sep-Oct;15(5):351-61.

    PMID: 22996847BACKGROUND
  • Gross A, Forget M, St George K, Fraser MM, Graham N, Perry L, Burnie SJ, Goldsmith CH, Haines T, Brunarski D. Patient education for neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD005106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005106.pub4.

    PMID: 22419306BACKGROUND
  • Haines T, Gross AR, Burnie S, Goldsmith CH, Perry L, Graham N; Cervical Overview Group (COG). A Cochrane review of patient education for neck pain. Spine J. 2009 Oct;9(10):859-71. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.019. Epub 2009 Jul 12.

    PMID: 19596214BACKGROUND
  • Louw A, Diener I, Butler DS, Puentedura EJ. The effect of neuroscience education on pain, disability, anxiety, and stress in chronic musculoskeletal pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Dec;92(12):2041-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.198.

    PMID: 22133255BACKGROUND
  • Louw A, Zimney K, Puentedura EJ, Diener I. The efficacy of pain neuroscience education on musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review of the literature. Physiother Theory Pract. 2016 Jul;32(5):332-55. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2016.1194646. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

    PMID: 27351541BACKGROUND
  • Moseley GL, Butler DS. Fifteen Years of Explaining Pain: The Past, Present, and Future. J Pain. 2015 Sep;16(9):807-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

    PMID: 26051220BACKGROUND
  • Meeus M, Nijs J, Van Oosterwijck J, Van Alsenoy V, Truijen S. Pain physiology education improves pain beliefs in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome compared with pacing and self-management education: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Aug;91(8):1153-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.04.020.

    PMID: 20684894BACKGROUND
  • Louw A, Butler DS, Diener I, Puentedura EJ. Development of a preoperative neuroscience educational program for patients with lumbar radiculopathy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 May;92(5):446-52. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182876aa4.

    PMID: 23478459BACKGROUND
  • Nijs J, Roussel N, Paul van Wilgen C, Koke A, Smeets R. Thinking beyond muscles and joints: therapists' and patients' attitudes and beliefs regarding chronic musculoskeletal pain are key to applying effective treatment. Man Ther. 2013 Apr;18(2):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Dec 28.

    PMID: 23273516BACKGROUND
  • Louw A, Diener I, Landers MR, Puentedura EJ. Preoperative pain neuroscience education for lumbar radiculopathy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Aug 15;39(18):1449-57. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000444.

    PMID: 24875964BACKGROUND
  • Nijs J, Wijma AJ, Willaert W, Huysmans E, Mintken P, Smeets R, Goossens M, van Wilgen CP, Van Bogaert W, Louw A, Cleland J, Donaldson M. Integrating Motivational Interviewing in Pain Neuroscience Education for People With Chronic Pain: A Practical Guide for Clinicians. Phys Ther. 2020 May 18;100(5):846-859. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa021.

    PMID: 31995191BACKGROUND
  • Morales Tejera D, Nijs J, Malfliet A, Prieto Aldana MA, Gallardo Vidal MI, Polentinos Castro E, Linares Fernandez MT, Fernandez-Carnero J. Effectiveness of pain neuroscience education, motivational interviewing and cognition targeted exercise therapy in patients with chronic neck pain: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (the COGMO-AP study). BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 20;15(2):e087788. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087788.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chronic PainNeck Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • María Adoración Prieto Aldana, 1st

    Gerencia de Atención Primaria de la Comunidad de Madrid

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2022

First Posted

March 27, 2023

Study Start

April 1, 2023

Primary Completion

May 1, 2024

Study Completion

May 14, 2024

Last Updated

May 9, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Due to the data protection law the information about individuals will be kept under a password in an electronic data protection website. After 2 years it may be made available under request.

Locations