Study Stopped
Study was never initiated or activated - Reason was lack of funding
Antimicrobial Revision in Persistent Febrile Neutropenia
Antimicrobial Revision in Patients With Persistent Febrile Neutropenia: A Prospective, Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Febrile neutropenia is often seen in patients with hematologic malignancies who receive cytotoxic chemotherapy. These patients are usually placed on posaconazole prophylaxis upon starting chemotherapy. If an episode of febrile neutropenia occurs, generally an anti-pseudomonal beta lactam, like cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam, is initiated. In patients who continue to fever on these agents, the optimal method of antimicrobial revision has yet to be determined.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Aug 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2025
CompletedSeptember 19, 2024
February 1, 2024
8 months
March 2, 2023
September 5, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Global Success Rate
Percentage of study candidates who meet all of the following criteria: * Defervescence, as defined by a temperature \< 38°C (100.4°F) sustained for at least 24 consecutive hours, within 72 hours of meropenem or micafungin initiation * Absence of signs or symptoms of infection within 72 hours of meropenem or micafungin initiation including but not limited to hypotension, erythema at catheter sites or cellulitis, positive imaging concerning for infection (e.g., pneumonia, osteomyelitis, abscesses etc.), positive cultures or rapid diagnostic tests, positive biomarkers (e.g. galactomannan), dysuria, hypothermia (≤ 35°C or ≤ 95°F) etc. * No modification to antimicrobial regimen after initiation of meropenem or micafungin unless the antibiotic modification is considered de-escalation (e.g. discontinuation of vancomycin)
Hour 72
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Number of Subjects In-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice
From hospital admission to death/discharge to hospice, up to 4 days
Hospital length of stay (days)
From hospital admission to discharge, up to 4 days
Time to defervescence (hours)
through study completion, an average of 4 days
Days of therapy of meropenem or micafungin
through study completion, an average of 4 days
Rate of Clostridioides difficile infection on meropenem or micafungin
through study completion, an average of 4 days
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Meropenem Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients who meet inclusion criteria may be randomized to meropenem (routine standard of care) dose according to local dosing guidelines to include the use of extended-infusions and adjustments to account for renal function. Duration will be managed by the primary team.
Micafungin Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients who meet inclusion criteria may be randomized to micafungin dosed as 150mg intravenously every 24 hours according to local dosing guidelines. Duration will be managed by the primary team.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥ 18 years of age
- Diagnosis of hematologic malignancy
- Receiving chemotherapy as treatment of hematologic malignancy
- Neutropenia defined as an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≤ 500 cells/mm3 or an ANC ≤ 1000 cells/mm3 with a predicted decline to \< 500 cells/mm3 within 48 hours
- Prescribed cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam as initial treatment for febrile neutropenia
- Persistent fever for ≥ 96 hours since initiation of cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam OR recurrent fever that occurs ≥ 96 hours since initiation of cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam (fever defined as single temperature of ≥ 38.3°C (101°F) or a temperature of ≥ 38°C (100.4°F) on two consecutive measures separated by at least one hour)
- Receipt of posaconazole as neutropenia prophylaxis for at least 3 calendar days
You may not qualify if:
- Clinically or microbiologically confirmed infection at time of enrollment, For example, a positive culture or rapid diagnostic test, positive imaging (X-ray, CT, MRI) or biomarker, such as galactomannan, that is consistent with infection
- History of infection with organism known to be resistant to meropenem or micafungin
- Documented allergy to carbapenems or echinocandins
- Concomitant use of valproic acid
- Uncontrolled seizure disorder
- Pregnancy
- Previous enrollment in this study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (11)
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). Prevention and Treatment of Cancer-Related Infections Version 1.2022. Accessed July 12, 2022. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=3&id=1457
BACKGROUNDFreifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, Boeckh MJ, Ito JI, Mullen CA, Raad II, Rolston KV, Young JA, Wingard JR; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Feb 15;52(4):e56-93. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir073.
PMID: 21258094BACKGROUNDAverbuch D, Orasch C, Cordonnier C, Livermore DM, Mikulska M, Viscoli C, Gyssens IC, Kern WV, Klyasova G, Marchetti O, Engelhard D, Akova M; ECIL4, a joint venture of EBMT, EORTC, ICHS, ESGICH/ESCMID and ELN. European guidelines for empirical antibacterial therapy for febrile neutropenic patients in the era of growing resistance: summary of the 2011 4th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia. Haematologica. 2013 Dec;98(12):1826-35. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.091025.
PMID: 24323983BACKGROUNDZimmer AJ, Freifeld AG. Optimal Management of Neutropenic Fever in Patients With Cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2019 Jan;15(1):19-24. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00269.
PMID: 30629902BACKGROUNDWalsh TJ, Teppler H, Donowitz GR, Maertens JA, Baden LR, Dmoszynska A, Cornely OA, Bourque MR, Lupinacci RJ, Sable CA, dePauw BE. Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1391-402. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040446.
PMID: 15459300BACKGROUNDOyake T, Kowata S, Murai K, Ito S, Akagi T, Kubo K, Sawada K, Ishida Y. Comparison of micafungin and voriconazole as empirical antifungal therapies in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Haematol. 2016 Jun;96(6):602-9. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12641. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
PMID: 26216048BACKGROUNDOztoprak N, Piskin N, Aydemir H, Celebi G, Akduman D, Keskin AS, Gokmen A, Engin H, Ankarali H. Piperacillin-tazobactam versus carbapenem therapy with and without amikacin as empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients: results of an open randomized trial at a university hospital. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug;40(8):761-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyq046. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
PMID: 20427546BACKGROUNDWang Y, Du Z, Chen Y, Liu Y, Yang Z. Meta-analysis: combination of meropenem vs ceftazidime and amikacin for empirical treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Feb 26;100(8):e24883. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024883.
PMID: 33663117BACKGROUNDNakane T, Tamura K, Hino M, Tamaki T, Yoshida I, Fukushima T, Tatsumi Y, Nakagawa Y, Hatanaka K, Takahashi T, Akiyama N, Tanimoto M, Ohyashiki K, Urabe A, Masaoka T, Kanamaru A; Japan Febrile Neutropenia Study Group. Cefozopran, meropenem, or imipenem-cilastatin compared with cefepime as empirical therapy in febrile neutropenic adult patients: A multicenter prospective randomized trial. J Infect Chemother. 2015 Jan;21(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2014.08.026. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
PMID: 25239059BACKGROUNDNakagawa Y, Suzuki K, Ohta K, Hino M, Ohyashiki K, Kanamaru A, Tamura K, Urabe A, Masaoka T; Japan Febrile Neutropenia Study Group. Prospective randomized study of cefepime, panipenem, or meropenem monotherapy for patients with hematological disorders and febrile neutropenia. J Infect Chemother. 2013 Feb;19(1):103-11. doi: 10.1007/s10156-012-0466-8. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
PMID: 22948387BACKGROUNDRatliff CM, Beardsley JR, Kennedy L, Ohl C, Johnson JW, Luther VP, William JC. Efficacy of doripenem compared with meropenem for treatment of febrile neutropenia among patients who became febrile while on cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam. Poster Presented at: Infectious Diseases Society of America Annual Meeting; October 21, 2011; Boston, MA. https://idsa.confex.com/idsa/2011/webprogram/Paper30902.html
BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Williamson, PharmD
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2023
First Posted
March 27, 2023
Study Start
August 1, 2024
Primary Completion
April 1, 2025
Study Completion
April 1, 2025
Last Updated
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share