Cardiac Biomarkers and Analytical Methods
Cardiac Biomarkers:Comparison Between Analytical Methods
1 other identifier
observational
500
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In the western world the prevalence of myocardial infarction is estimated at around 1-2% of the population; increases progressively with age, reaching a percentage of 10% after the 75 years. It is therefore considered the first cause of hospitalization and mortality in Western countries, as well as expenditure for the health system. It is therefore very important to have cardiac biomarkers that allow to confirm the diagnostic suspicion of coronary heart disease and/or heart failure, carry out prognostic evaluations and stratify patients as precisely as possible in relation to their actual risk. Currently as biomarkers of heart failure, natriuretic peptides (BNP and NT-proBNP) are widely used in clinical practice but, considering the complexity of heart failure and its clinical and pathophysiological heterogeneity, it is reasonable to think that a single biomarker is not sufficient . For these reasons, there is increasing interest in the scientific community in the search for new biomarkers useful for early diagnosis, for correct prognostic stratification and for evaluating the response to therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2020
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 23, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2024
CompletedSeptember 26, 2024
September 1, 2024
1.1 years
February 21, 2023
September 24, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Evaluate current and new laboratory methods and assays
The analytical performance of the assay will be evaluated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP15-A3 guidelines with the aim to highlight the differences respect to the methods currently used in laboratory and optimize the diagnostic accuracy and precison of the available tests. Comparison between different methods with different analytical sensitivity for the same cardiac biomarker (eg Troponin ultra- Troponin Singulex- Troponin Hs).
24 months
Evaluate new cardiac biomarkers
Evaluate new cardiac biomarkers (eg sST2) to implement in the panel of available assays, in response to clinician requests, international guidelines and the emerging potential of new biochemical tests. Evaluate the medium-long term (1 year) predictive value of the new biomarker in the heart patients attending at the Emergency Department for non-STEMI Acute Chest Pain.
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Create a multiparametric algorithm/score
36 months
Eligibility Criteria
500 samples, of residual serum, from patients hospitalized and/or referred to the DEA of our Polyclinic, for which troponin and/or NT-proBNP tests have been requested routinely or urgently by clinicians, will be included in the study.
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Patients arriving in the emergency room with chest pain of presumable cardiac origin and uncertain etiological diagnosis
- Routine request for cardiac Troponin and NT-ProBNP
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<18 years;
- No requirement for cardiac Troponin and NT-ProBNP
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Silvia Baroni
Roma, 00168, Italy
Related Publications (7)
Apple FS, Collinson PO; IFCC Task Force on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Biomarkers. Analytical characteristics of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. Clin Chem. 2012 Jan;58(1):54-61. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.165795. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
PMID: 21965555BACKGROUNDBonaca MP, Ruff CT, Kosowsky J, Conrad MJ, Murphy SA, Sabatine MS, Jarolim P, Morrow DA. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of current and next-generation assays for cardiac troponin I in the BWH-TIMI ED Chest Pain Study. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2013 Sep;2(3):195-202. doi: 10.1177/2048872613486249.
PMID: 24222830BACKGROUNDJanuzzi JL, Mebazaa A, Di Somma S. ST2 and prognosis in acutely decompensated heart failure: the International ST2 Consensus Panel. Am J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 2;115(7 Suppl):26B-31B. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.037. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
PMID: 25665762BACKGROUNDSamaha E, Avila A, Helwani MA, Ben Abdallah A, Jaffe AS, Scott MG, Nagele P. High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin After Cardiac Stress Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Mar 19;8(6):e008626. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008626.
PMID: 30871395BACKGROUNDNeumann JT, Havulinna AS, Zeller T, Appelbaum S, Kunnas T, Nikkari S, Jousilahti P, Blankenberg S, Sydow K, Salomaa V. Comparison of three troponins as predictors of future cardiovascular events--prospective results from the FINRISK and BiomaCaRE studies. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 4;9(3):e90063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090063. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24594734BACKGROUNDYancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, Fonarow GC, Geraci SA, Horwich T, Januzzi JL, Johnson MR, Kasper EK, Levy WC, Masoudi FA, McBride PE, McMurray JJ, Mitchell JE, Peterson PN, Riegel B, Sam F, Stevenson LW, Tang WH, Tsai EJ, Wilkoff BL; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;62(16):e147-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Jun 5. No abstract available.
PMID: 23747642BACKGROUNDSarlo F, De Luca C, Moretti G, Urbani A, Baroni S. Analytical performance evaluation of the new sST2 turbidimetric assay implemented in laboratory automation systems. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Oct 18;60(2):e54-e56. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0851. Print 2022 Jan 27. No abstract available.
PMID: 34655512RESULT
Biospecimen
residual serum
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Confirmed researcher - Adjunct Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2023
First Posted
March 23, 2023
Study Start
February 10, 2020
Primary Completion
March 8, 2021
Study Completion
August 31, 2024
Last Updated
September 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09