Dexmedetomidine Versus General Anesthesia on the Diagnosis of Endobronchial US-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
Moderate Sedation by Dexmedetomidine Versus General Anesthesia on the Diagnostic Yield of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: A Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare dexmedetomidine as moderate sedation versus general anathesia on the diagnostic yield of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 23, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2023
CompletedOctober 25, 2023
October 1, 2023
6 months
February 23, 2023
October 24, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic yield of Endobronchial ultrasound -guided transbronchial needle aspiration
The number of subjects in whom Endobronchial ultrasound -guided transbronchial needle aspiration provided a specific diagnosis will be assessed
During procedure
Study Arms (2)
dexmedetomidine group
ACTIVE COMPARATORgeneral anesthesia group
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
patients will recieve moderate sedation by dexmedetomidine as study group
general anesthesia with neuromuscular blockade under controlled ventilation as control group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification II or III a requiring EBUS-TBNA based on suspicion of either benign or malignant disease in mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes (LNs) or masses or requiring EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal staging of lung cancer.
You may not qualify if:
- Suspected need for additional procedures other than EBUS-TBNA during planned bronchoscopy (e.g., need for navigational bronchoscopy, endobronchial biopsies, and therapeutic bronchoscopy)
- body mass index \> 35 kg/m2
- allergies to any of the involved sedatives or anesthetic agents
- comorbidities contraindicating the EBUS procedure
- pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mohammad Fouad Algyar
Tanta, ElGharbiaa, 31511, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed S Torky
Lecturer of Chest Department , Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2023
First Posted
March 23, 2023
Study Start
April 1, 2023
Primary Completion
October 1, 2023
Study Completion
October 1, 2023
Last Updated
October 25, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- One year after the end of the study
The data will be provided under a reasonable request from the corresponding author.