NCT05770726

Brief Summary

Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) colitis is a common hospital-acquired disease, which increases hospitalization length and the mortality rate. Moreover, refractory or recurrent C. difficile colitis is an emerging disease. The tapering course of oral vancomycin or oral fidaxomicin is current standard treatment for refractory or recurrent C. difficile colitis. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an alternative one. However, the tapering course of oral vancomycin needs a 6- to 12-week duration, fidaxomicin is expensive, and FMT is not available in every hospital; therefore, it is needed to develop a new treatment. Evidence has shown that the disturbance with reduced diversity of intestinal microbiota may lead to refractory C. difficile colitis. Besides fecal microbiota transplantation, probiotics administration can also correct the disturbed intestinal microbiota. However, inconsistent efficacy of probiotic administration was reported, which may be attributed to the interference by the gastric acid. Precise delivery of probiotics into the colon by colonoscopy can avoid the destruction by gastric acid, with which a better treatment efficacy is expected. The best regimen for C. difficile colitis should be the one which succeeds on the first attempt. Therefore, this study is aimed toward validating the efficacy and safety of the colonoscopic probiotics-spray. Patients diagnosed with C. colitis will be enrolled. All patients will accept the standard treatment of oral vancomycin for 14 days. As an adjuvant probiotic administration at the same time, enrolled patients will be randomly assigned to the probiotics-spray (PS) group and the probiotics-oral (PO) group, respectively. The patients in the PS group will receive colonoscopic spray of probiotics once, while the patients in the PO group will receive the same dosage of oral probiotics divided into 5 days. This study will compare the difference in fecal microbiota changes between the colonoscopic probiotics-spray group and the probiotics-oral group. Moreover, this study will evaluate the efficacy and safety between the colonoscopic probiotics-spray and probiotics-oral in patients with C. difficile colitis.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 5, 2023

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 15, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 21, 2023

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 16, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

March 5, 2023

Last Update Submit

May 14, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Clostridioides difficile colitis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The percentage of difference in fecal microbiota change, including probiotics, between the colonoscopic probiotics-spray and probiotics-oral and before and after probiotics use either by colonoscopic probiotics-spray or probiotics-oral

    All patients will be monitored for 30 days after diagnosis of C. difficile colitis. The primary endpoint is the comparison of the perseverance of fecal microbiota and metabolites. We will compare the microbiota by sequencing 16S rRNA, measured as percentage abundance per microbial species and differences in percentage abundance between the PS group and PO group in Day 0 and Day 5. We will also compare the relative abundance of C. difficile and target probiotics between the two study groups, such as Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Streptococcus thermophilus, or others.

    5 days

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • The rate of resolution of C. difficile colitis

    30 days

  • Hospitalization length

    30 days

  • The rate of recurrence of C. difficile colitis

    30 days

  • The rate of mortality events

    30 days

  • The rate of adverse events

    30 days

Study Arms (2)

probiotics-spray (PS) group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the PS group, the colonoscopic prescription of 10 grams of probiotics powder is performed once on one of the first three days (D0-D3).

Dietary Supplement: Probiotics administration

probiotics-oral (PO) group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the PO group, we will prescribe oral probiotics 2 capsules once per day for 5 days (a total of 10 grams) as adjunctive treatment during the first five days (D0-D4).

Dietary Supplement: Probiotics administration

Interventions

Probiotics administrationDIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

A total of 10 grams of probiotics was administered in both group, but the routes were different. One group were per colonoscopic spray, and the other was per oral.

probiotics-oral (PO) groupprobiotics-spray (PS) group

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients aged ≥ 20 years who are diagnosed with C. difficile colitis

You may not qualify if:

  • patients are diagnosed with colitis because of other etiologies, such as intestinal Behçet's disease, amoeba or parasitic colitis, Salmonella colitis, lymphoma, E. coli colitis, cytomegalovirus colitis, ischemic colitis, sigmoid-colon cancer, inflammatory bowel diseases (ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease), solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, radiation colitis
  • patients who have contraindications for colonoscopy, including declining or refusal to cooperate
  • unstable vital signs
  • a diagnosis or highly suspicion of colon rupture
  • a high-risk situation for colon perforation such as acute diverticulitis
  • toxic megacolon, etc.
  • acute myocardial infarct

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

Tainan, Other (Non U.s.), 704, Taiwan

RECRUITING

Related Publications (25)

  • McDonald LC, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Bakken JS, Carroll KC, Coffin SE, Dubberke ER, Garey KW, Gould CV, Kelly C, Loo V, Shaklee Sammons J, Sandora TJ, Wilcox MH. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):e1-e48. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1085.

  • Bagdasarian N, Rao K, Malani PN. Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in adults: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):398-408. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17103.

  • Kelly CP, LaMont JT. Clostridium difficile--more difficult than ever. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 30;359(18):1932-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0707500. No abstract available.

  • Kelly CR, Fischer M, Allegretti JR, LaPlante K, Stewart DB, Limketkai BN, Stollman NH. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infections. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 1;116(6):1124-1147. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001278.

  • Goodhand JR, Alazawi W, Rampton DS. Systematic review: Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Feb;33(4):428-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04548.x. Epub 2010 Dec 30.

  • Chang JY, Antonopoulos DA, Kalra A, Tonelli A, Khalife WT, Schmidt TM, Young VB. Decreased diversity of the fecal Microbiome in recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Infect Dis. 2008 Feb 1;197(3):435-8. doi: 10.1086/525047.

  • Mullish BH, Quraishi MN, Segal JP, McCune VL, Baxter M, Marsden GL, Moore DJ, Colville A, Bhala N, Iqbal TH, Settle C, Kontkowski G, Hart AL, Hawkey PM, Goldenberg SD, Williams HRT. The use of faecal microbiota transplant as treatment for recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile infection and other potential indications: joint British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS) guidelines. Gut. 2018 Nov;67(11):1920-1941. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316818. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

  • van Nood E, Vrieze A, Nieuwdorp M, Fuentes S, Zoetendal EG, de Vos WM, Visser CE, Kuijper EJ, Bartelsman JF, Tijssen JG, Speelman P, Dijkgraaf MG, Keller JJ. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 31;368(5):407-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205037. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

  • Hemarajata P, Versalovic J. Effects of probiotics on gut microbiota: mechanisms of intestinal immunomodulation and neuromodulation. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan;6(1):39-51. doi: 10.1177/1756283X12459294.

  • Hempel S, Newberry SJ, Maher AR, Wang Z, Miles JN, Shanman R, Johnsen B, Shekelle PG. Probiotics for the prevention and treatment of antibiotic-associated diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012 May 9;307(18):1959-69. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.3507.

  • Phanchana M, Harnvoravongchai P, Wongkuna S, Phetruen T, Phothichaisri W, Panturat S, Pipatthana M, Charoensutthivarakul S, Chankhamhaengdecha S, Janvilisri T. Frontiers in antibiotic alternatives for Clostridioides difficile infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov 14;27(42):7210-7232. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i42.7210.

  • Pillai A, Nelson R. Probiotics for treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated colitis in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;2008(1):CD004611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004611.pub2.

  • Corcoran BM, Stanton C, Fitzgerald GF, Ross RP. Survival of probiotic lactobacilli in acidic environments is enhanced in the presence of metabolizable sugars. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jun;71(6):3060-7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.6.3060-3067.2005.

  • Han S, Lu Y, Xie J, Fei Y, Zheng G, Wang Z, Liu J, Lv L, Ling Z, Berglund B, Yao M, Li L. Probiotic Gastrointestinal Transit and Colonization After Oral Administration: A Long Journey. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Mar 10;11:609722. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.609722. eCollection 2021.

  • Staley C, Halaweish H, Graiziger C, Hamilton MJ, Kabage AJ, Galdys AL, Vaughn BP, Vantanasiri K, Suryanarayanan R, Sadowsky MJ, Khoruts A. Lower endoscopic delivery of freeze-dried intestinal microbiota results in more rapid and efficient engraftment than oral administration. Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 25;11(1):4519. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84152-6.

  • Honda H, Dubberke ER. Clostridium difficile infection: a re-emerging threat. Mo Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;106(4):287-91.

  • Wu KS, Syue LS, Cheng A, Yen TY, Chen HM, Chiu YH, Hsu YL, Chiu CH, Su TY, Tsai WL, Chen WY, Huang CH, Hung HM, Huang LJ, Kuo HJ, Lin PC, Yang CH, Hong PL, Lee SS, Chen YS, Liu YC, Huang LM; Infectious Diseases Society of Taiwan; Medical Foundation in Memory of Dr. Deh-Lin Cheng; Foundation of Professor Wei-Chuan Hsieh for Infectious Diseases Research and Education; CY Lee's Research Foundation for Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines; 5th Guidelines Recommendations for Evidence-based Antimicrobial agents use in Taiwan (GREAT) working group. Recommendations and guidelines for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020 Apr;53(2):191-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Feb 14.

  • Surawicz CM, Alexander J. Treatment of refractory and recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jun;8(6):330-9. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.59. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

  • Chilton CH, Pickering DS, Freeman J. Microbiologic factors affecting Clostridium difficile recurrence. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 May;24(5):476-482. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.11.017. Epub 2017 Dec 5.

  • Ma C, Wasti S, Huang S, Zhang Z, Mishra R, Jiang S, You Z, Wu Y, Chang H, Wang Y, Huo D, Li C, Sun Z, Sun Z, Zhang J. The gut microbiome stability is altered by probiotic ingestion and improved by the continuous supplementation of galactooligosaccharide. Gut Microbes. 2020 Nov 9;12(1):1785252. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1785252. Epub 2020 Jul 14.

  • Dodoo CC, Wang J, Basit AW, Stapleton P, Gaisford S. Targeted delivery of probiotics to enhance gastrointestinal stability and intestinal colonisation. Int J Pharm. 2017 Sep 15;530(1-2):224-229. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.07.068. Epub 2017 Jul 29.

  • Bojanova DP, Bordenstein SR. Fecal Transplants: What Is Being Transferred? PLoS Biol. 2016 Jul 12;14(7):e1002503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002503. eCollection 2016 Jul.

  • Ledoux D, Labombardi VJ, Karter D. Lactobacillus acidophilus bacteraemia after use of a probiotic in a patient with AIDS and Hodgkin's disease. Int J STD AIDS. 2006 Apr;17(4):280-2. doi: 10.1258/095646206776253507.

  • Johnstone J, Meade M, Lauzier F, Marshall J, Duan E, Dionne J, Arabi YM, Heels-Ansdell D, Thabane L, Lamarche D, Surette M, Zytaruk N, Mehta S, Dodek P, McIntyre L, English S, Rochwerg B, Karachi T, Henderson W, Wood G, Ovakim D, Herridge M, Granton J, Wilcox ME, Goffi A, Stelfox HT, Niven D, Muscedere J, Lamontagne F, D'Aragon F, St-Arnaud C, Ball I, Nagpal D, Girard M, Aslanian P, Charbonney E, Williamson D, Sligl W, Friedrich J, Adhikari NK, Marquis F, Archambault P, Khwaja K, Kristof A, Kutsogiannis J, Zarychanski R, Paunovic B, Reeve B, Lellouche F, Hosek P, Tsang J, Binnie A, Trop S, Loubani O, Hall R, Cirone R, Reynolds S, Lysecki P, Golan E, Cartin-Ceba R, Taylor R, Cook D; Prevention of Severe Pneumonia and Endotracheal Colonization Trial (PROSPECT) Investigators and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Effect of Probiotics on Incident Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Sep 21;326(11):1024-1033. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13355.

  • Georgieva R, Yocheva L, Tserovska L, Zhelezova G, Stefanova N, Atanasova A, Danguleva A, Ivanova G, Karapetkov N, Rumyan N, Karaivanova E. Antimicrobial activity and antibiotic susceptibility of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium spp. intended for use as starter and probiotic cultures. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2015 Jan 2;29(1):84-91. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2014.987450. Epub 2014 Dec 11.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dysentery

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

GastroenteritisGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesIntestinal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Hsueh-Chien Chiang, M.D.

    National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Hsueh-Chien Chiang, M.D.

CONTACT

Hsiu-Chi Cheng, Ph.D

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2023

First Posted

March 15, 2023

Study Start

April 21, 2023

Primary Completion

December 31, 2024

Study Completion

December 31, 2024

Last Updated

May 16, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Locations