NCT05758506

Brief Summary

Case-control diagnostic accuracy study with 130 potential pediatric PID+ (primary immunodeficiency) patients, and 100 age-matched, healthy controls (PID-). The potential PID+ participants will be recruited prospectively through 9 hospitals in Sindh and Punjab states or contacted via the PID surveillance registry developed by AKU Hospital's Polio Excretion in PID study to identify children with primary antibody deficiency (PAD+: a type of PID+); healthy, age-matched PID-participants will be recruited by snowball sampling. At the point of care, health care workers (HCWs) will collect capillary blood samples (0.1mL) to run the PID rapid screening test and reader on potential PID+ participants (identified by exhibiting \>2 of the Jeffrey Modell warning signs) and healthy, age-matched controls. All pediatric study participants will be sent to the hospital lab to have a confirmatory immunology panel (see 4.4.1 Diagnosing PID for the battery of tests) run on a serum/plasma sample to confirm their PID diagnosis (PID+/PAD-, PID+/PAD+, PID-); a 1.5uL aliquot of serum/plasma will simultaneously be used to run a PID rapid screening test by a laboratory technician (LT). HCWs and LTs will be blinded to true PID status. Blood and serum PID rapid screening test results will be compared to the confirmatory immunology panel to determine diagnostic accuracy. All clinical management of study participants will follow the standard of care for PID in Pakistan and will be based upon the immunology panel result. The HCWs and LTs administering the tests will be trained prior to the diagnostic accuracy test (see Objectives below) and will provide feedback on the tool post-training and post-use to assess usability, acceptability, and feasibility of integrating the test and digital reader into tertiary hospitals for the purpose of improved national PID surveillance, improved PID patient care, and polio eradication in Pakistan.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 10, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 7, 2023

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 31, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

November 10, 2022

Last Update Submit

July 28, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Diagnostic accuracy

    Estimates of diagnostic accuracy characteristics with 95% confidence intervals (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) of the PID screening test for relevant PIDs in a Pakistani population of both PID+ children and PID- age-matched healthy controls

    8 month

  • Determine usability, acceptability, feasibility of integrating PID test and digital reader into tertiary hospitals for improved patient care

    Estimates of user effectiveness, efficacy, satisfaction, learnability, and feasibility among trained health care workers (HCWs) and laboratory technicians (LTs) will be evaluated using observation checklists and surveys. The observation checklist will evaluate the ability to administer the test, read the test results accurately after the appropriate amount of waiting time, record the result in the digital reader app, operate the digital app to read a photograph of the test result, and their ease of performing these tasks. This methodology adheres to ISO 9241-210 on human-centered design principles in usability testing.

    8 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Effectiveness - agreement between the PID screening test readouts (#1, #2) with each other, the digital reading, a PATH expert panel, and the local PID standard of care immunology tests.

    8 months

  • Effectiveness

    8 months

  • Understandability of diagnostic instruction

    8 months

  • Usability of screening test result outputs

    8 months

  • Usability for facilitators

    8 months

Study Arms (3)

Pediatric PID patients (prospective)

Prospective, age-matched, healthy patients

Device: Primary Immunodeficiency (PID) Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT)

Pediatric PID patients (recontacted from registry)

Device: Primary Immunodeficiency (PID) Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT)

Prospective, age-matched, healthy patients

Device: Primary Immunodeficiency (PID) Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT)

Interventions

We are evaluating the accuracy of a new rapid diagnostic screening test. There is no medical intervention with the participants in this study.

Pediatric PID patients (prospective)Pediatric PID patients (recontacted from registry)Prospective, age-matched, healthy patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age3 Months - 15 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

\- 130 potential PID patients with (5 relevant PIDs: PADs) within Sindh and Punjab states V1.0, 6 Jan 2022 • 100 healthy, age-matched children within Sindh and Punjab state

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 3 months to 15 years
  • Presents for care at 1 of 9tertiary hospitals participating in the study
  • Potential PID+ (Case): Child is identified by HCW to have \>2 Jeffrey Model warning signs of PID. \[Note: Upon immunology panel testing, this group will be separated into three categories: PID-, PID+, and PID+/PAD+ meaning they have 1 of 5 relevant primary antibody deficiencies (PAD+)\].
  • PID-(Control): Child is identified (by snowball sampling) as being in good health, and having the same age (within 12 months) as another child who produced a PID+ result.
  • Caregiver consents to participate in the study and provides informed consent. If their children are 10 years of age or older, that child must also give assent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Aged less than 3 months or greater than 15 years of age
  • Caregiver does not consent to participate, or child \>10years does not give assent to participate.
  • Having received IVIG in the past 90 days

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Aga Khan University Hospital

Karachi, Pakistan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases

Interventions

Rapid Diagnostic Tests

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Clinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisInvestigative TechniquesPoint-of-Care TestingPoint-of-Care SystemsPatient Care ManagementHealth Services Administration

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior Research Research Officer, Diagnostics

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2022

First Posted

March 7, 2023

Study Start

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion

September 30, 2024

Study Completion

December 15, 2024

Last Updated

July 31, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The data generated by this study will inform decisions regarding product development and commercialization of the BioSure PID rapid screening test and digital reader. The data collected in this evaluation may be used to support regulatory approval of the test. The study will generate valuable data on the performance of this novel test in comparison to that of the Jeffrey Modell warning signs and the immunology panel enabling informed decision-making regarding recommendation of new highly sensitive POC tools for PID. Data will be shared with study partners and the test developers. This may include de-identified, individual-level data.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL

Locations