NCT05751460

Brief Summary

Urdu version of pelvic girdle questionnaire was drafted, tested for its reliability and validity on patients with pelvic girdle pain. Urdu version was linguistically acceptable and accurate for pregnant and post partum females with pelvic girdle pain. The result seems comparable to all the other versions and especially with original Norwegian version. This instrument is understandable and easy to find disability during pregnancy and post partum duration. It showed a good content, construct and convergent validity also present high internal consistency and test retest reliability.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
125

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 2, 2021

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 31, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2022

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 21, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 2, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

March 2, 2023

Status Verified

February 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

October 21, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 20, 2023

Conditions

Pelvic Girdle Pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Content validity

    Content validity score measured by content validity index. Assessment of 25 items by Clinician and native speaker experts rate all the items and all the value are above 0.70.Lower value was 0.92 and the highest value is 1 which is maximum value. Maximum score is given to 4, 5, 6,10,11,12,17,18,22 and 24 by experts (medical specialist and native speakers).

    "through study completion, an average of 1 year"

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Internal consistency:

    "upto two weeks"

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Convergent validity

    "through study completion, an average of 1 year"

  • Test Retest reliability:

    "through study completion, an average of 1 year"

Interventions

Straight leg raiseOTHER

Diagnostic test, tool for \*g\*

Also known as: Pelvic girdle questionnaire

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Female pregnant and post partum with pelvic girdle pain

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18-50 years
  • Only Females
  • Able to read Urdu Language
  • Pregnant women (gestational week 30-38)
  • Postpartum women (given birth less than one year earlier)

You may not qualify if:

  • Any neurological diseases (reflex changes \& loss of sensation)
  • Unstable medical conditions leading to fatigue
  • Those that have prolapse or severe urinary disease
  • Previous surgery on pelvis, lower limb or spine
  • Cannot Understand Urdu
  • Difficulty in understanding the Pelvic girdle questionnaire

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faiza Kalsoom

Gujrat, Punjab Province, 50931, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Cong H, Liu H, Sun Y, Gao J, Liu J, Ma L, Stuge B, Chen L. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of a Chinese version of the pelvic girdle questionnaire. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jun 30;21(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03962-8.

    PMID: 34193061BACKGROUND

  • Sakamoto A, Hoshi K, Gamada K. Transcultural Reliability and Validity of the Japanese-Language Version of the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020 Jan;43(1):68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.11.019. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

    PMID: 32061416BACKGROUND

  • Acharya RS, Tveter AT, Grotle M, Khadgi B, Koju R, Eberhard-Gran M, Stuge B. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Nepali Version of the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020 Mar-Apr;43(3):257-265. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.04.009. Epub 2020 Jul 29.

    PMID: 32739042BACKGROUND

  • Munisamy A, Sahid, Sheerad Hussin, Muhammad. Content Validation and Content Validity Index Calculation of B40 Household's Financial Literacy. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry. 202112(8).

    BACKGROUND

  • Dunn G, Egger MJ, Shaw JM, Yang J, Bardsley T, Powers E, Nygaard IE. Trajectories of lower back, upper back, and pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy and early postpartum in primiparous women. Womens Health (Lond). 2019 Jan-Dec;15:1745506519842757. doi: 10.1177/1745506519842757.

    PMID: 30991911BACKGROUND

  • Gutke A, Stuge B, Elden H, Sandell C, Asplin G, Fagevik Olsen M. The Swedish version of the pelvic girdle questionnaire, cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Apr;42(7):1013-1020. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1515991. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

    PMID: 30707631BACKGROUND

  • Rashidi Fakari F, Kariman N, Ozgoli G, Ghare Naz MS, Ghasemi V, Rashidi Fakari F, Ebadi A. Iranian version of Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and cultural adaptation. J Res Med Sci. 2019 May 22;24:43. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_391_18. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31160910BACKGROUND

  • Fagundes FML, Cabral CMN. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ) into Brazilian Portuguese and clinimetric testing of the PGQ and Roland Morris questionnaire in pregnancy pelvic pain. Braz J Phys Ther. 2019 Mar-Apr;23(2):132-139. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 17.

    PMID: 30501939BACKGROUND

  • Starzec M, Truszczynska-Baszak A, Stuge B, Tarnowski A, Rongies W. Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire for the Polish Population. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 Oct;41(8):698-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Dec 26.

    PMID: 30594333BACKGROUND

  • Girard MP, O'Shaughnessy J, Doucet C, Lardon E, Stuge B, Ruchat SM, Descarreaux M. Validation of the French-Canadian Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 Mar-Apr;41(3):234-241. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

    PMID: 29456093BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Girdle Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Musculoskeletal PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPelvic Pain

Study Officials

  • Sumera Abdul Hameed, MS

    Riphah International University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
OTHER
Target Duration
1 Week
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2022

First Posted

March 2, 2023

Study Start

January 2, 2021

Primary Completion

January 31, 2022

Study Completion

January 31, 2022

Last Updated

March 2, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations

PA(1)