NCT05751382

Brief Summary

This is a split-mouth randomized clinical investigation conducted to evaluate clinical performances of a self-adhesive hybrid resin composite (investigational medical device Surefil) compared to a traditional composite resin, when used for direct restorations of non-carious lesions (NCCLs). The study consists of a 3-year long follow-up period.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
16

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 21, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 7, 2023

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 2, 2023

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 22, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 22, 2024

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 13, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 13, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

February 7, 2023

Results QC Date

February 13, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 22, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Assessment of Restorative Quality

    The restorations will be evaluated using the World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria.

    At 36 months follow-up.

  • Assessment of Restorative Quality

    The restorations will be evaluated using the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria.

    At 36 months follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Assessment of Restorative Quality

    At 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up

  • Assessment of Restorative Quality

    At 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up

  • Assessment of Aesthetics

    At 6, 12, 24 and 36 months follow-up

  • Level of Pain

    At 6, 12, 24 and 36 months follow-up

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Time Needed to Perform the Restoration

    Day 0

Study Arms (2)

Restoration with Surefil one hybrid composite

EXPERIMENTAL

In a split-mouth design, subjects were randomly assigned to restoration with Surefil one hybrid composite in either the left or the right upper quadrant. Restoration performed with Surefil one hybrid composite applied according to manufacturer's instruction and cured for 20 seconds with a LED lamp (Smartlamp Pro).

Device: Surefil one

Restoration with Venus Pearl composite

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In a split-mouth design, subjects were randomly assigned to restoration with Venus Pearl composite in either the left or the right upper quadrant. After the application of the adhesive system (iBond universal), the Venus Pearl composite will be layered on the cavity and cured for 20 seconds with a LED lamp Smartlamp Pro).

Device: Venus Pearl

Interventions

Restorative material (Dentsply Sirona). Used for direct restoration of class V NCCL.

Restoration with Surefil one hybrid composite

Restorative material. Traditional paste composite employed in combination with iBond universal adhesive.

Restoration with Venus Pearl composite

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aging from 18 to 70
  • % women, 40-60% men
  • Patients who present at least 2 cervical lesions on canines and / or upper premolars on vital teeth
  • Patients who are not allergic or sensitive to the ingredients contained in the products
  • The test patient consents to the restorative treatment in line with the study´s criteria (informed consent)
  • Sufficiently understanding of the language

You may not qualify if:

  • Extremely low level of oral hygiene
  • Teeth with previous restorations
  • Not possible adequate isolation of the operating area
  • Patients with serious systemic diseases
  • Devitalized teeth or with pulpitis in progress
  • Periodontal problems on the elements to be restored

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Clinica Odontoiatrica (DIBINEM)

Bologna, 40125, Italy

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
AnnaKarin Lungren Dr.
Organization
Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables

Study Officials

  • Lorenzo Breschi, Prof

    Clinica Odontoiatrica (DIBINEM)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The aesthetic integration of the restoration will be evaluated by two experienced and blinded operators following the aesthetic criteria of the FDI.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Split-mouth design, i.e. each subject have both treatment arms.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2023

First Posted

March 2, 2023

Study Start

September 21, 2022

Primary Completion

January 22, 2024

Study Completion

January 22, 2024

Last Updated

January 13, 2025

Results First Posted

January 13, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-11

Locations