Study Stopped
Due to slow recruitment.
Evaluation of Self-adhesive Hybrid Resin Composite Compared to a Traditional Composite Resin in Restorations of NCCLs
3-year Evaluation of the Clinical Performances of a Self-adhesive Hybrid Resin Composite Compared to a Traditional Composite Resin Used for Direct Restorations of Non-carious Cervical Lesions (NCCLs): A Split-mouth Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a split-mouth randomized clinical investigation conducted to evaluate clinical performances of a self-adhesive hybrid resin composite (investigational medical device Surefil) compared to a traditional composite resin, when used for direct restorations of non-carious lesions (NCCLs). The study consists of a 3-year long follow-up period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 21, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 2, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 22, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 13, 2025
CompletedJanuary 13, 2025
November 1, 2024
1.3 years
February 7, 2023
February 13, 2024
November 22, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Assessment of Restorative Quality
The restorations will be evaluated using the World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria.
At 36 months follow-up.
Assessment of Restorative Quality
The restorations will be evaluated using the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria.
At 36 months follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Assessment of Restorative Quality
At 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
Assessment of Restorative Quality
At 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
Assessment of Aesthetics
At 6, 12, 24 and 36 months follow-up
Level of Pain
At 6, 12, 24 and 36 months follow-up
Other Outcomes (1)
Time Needed to Perform the Restoration
Day 0
Study Arms (2)
Restoration with Surefil one hybrid composite
EXPERIMENTALIn a split-mouth design, subjects were randomly assigned to restoration with Surefil one hybrid composite in either the left or the right upper quadrant. Restoration performed with Surefil one hybrid composite applied according to manufacturer's instruction and cured for 20 seconds with a LED lamp (Smartlamp Pro).
Restoration with Venus Pearl composite
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn a split-mouth design, subjects were randomly assigned to restoration with Venus Pearl composite in either the left or the right upper quadrant. After the application of the adhesive system (iBond universal), the Venus Pearl composite will be layered on the cavity and cured for 20 seconds with a LED lamp Smartlamp Pro).
Interventions
Restorative material (Dentsply Sirona). Used for direct restoration of class V NCCL.
Restorative material. Traditional paste composite employed in combination with iBond universal adhesive.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aging from 18 to 70
- % women, 40-60% men
- Patients who present at least 2 cervical lesions on canines and / or upper premolars on vital teeth
- Patients who are not allergic or sensitive to the ingredients contained in the products
- The test patient consents to the restorative treatment in line with the study´s criteria (informed consent)
- Sufficiently understanding of the language
You may not qualify if:
- Extremely low level of oral hygiene
- Teeth with previous restorations
- Not possible adequate isolation of the operating area
- Patients with serious systemic diseases
- Devitalized teeth or with pulpitis in progress
- Periodontal problems on the elements to be restored
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Clinica Odontoiatrica (DIBINEM)
Bologna, 40125, Italy
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- AnnaKarin Lungren Dr.
- Organization
- Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lorenzo Breschi, Prof
Clinica Odontoiatrica (DIBINEM)
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The aesthetic integration of the restoration will be evaluated by two experienced and blinded operators following the aesthetic criteria of the FDI.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2023
First Posted
March 2, 2023
Study Start
September 21, 2022
Primary Completion
January 22, 2024
Study Completion
January 22, 2024
Last Updated
January 13, 2025
Results First Posted
January 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-11