Atraumatic Zirconia Abutment Versus Customized Composite Healing Abutment in Maxilla or Mandible.
Closure of a Guided Immediate Implant Placed in the Extraction Socket With Bone Augmentation in the Lateral Area of the Maxilla or Mandible, With a Temporary Composite Abutment vs With a Custom-made Zirconium Oxide Abutment.
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
40 patients are included in the study, 20 patients in group 1 (=closure with composite material shaper; test group) and 20 patients in group 2 (=closure with custom-made zirconia oxide abutment; control group). Randomisation envelopes will be used for randomisation. Device under study: Straumann BLX, Roxolid® , SLActive® dental implants with a diameter of 3.5, 3.75, 4, 4.5 mm are used. Allogenic bone botiss maxgraft® cortical granules are used as graft material. Inclusion criteria:
- 1.Males and females at least 18 years of age or older.
- 2.One implant per patient.
- 3.Prior to any study-related activity, the subject must voluntarily sign informed consent, be willing and able to attend scheduled follow-up visits, and agree to the collection and analysis of pseudonymised data.
- 4.Lateral individual teeth (premolars and molars).
- 5.Class I extraction socket (intact buccal wall) or class II (1/3 of buccal wall).
- 6.The gingival contour of the tooth to be extracted - without recession.
- 7.Adjacent anterior teeth have no periodontal loss.
- 8.There are no implants in the adjacent teeth.
- 9.Non-traumatic tooth extraction, which results in intact walls of the socket.
- 10.Deep occlusion (severe, class II).
- 11.The patient smokes a lot (more than 10 cigarettes per day).
- 12.Systemic disease (osteoporosis).
- 13.No initial stability has been achieved after the implant insertion procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 11, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 28, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 28, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 22, 2025
CompletedMay 14, 2025
May 1, 2025
1.2 years
January 11, 2023
May 8, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Stability of crestal bone
To compare crystal bone stability CBCT will be taken before surgery. , immediately after surgery, after 3 month and a follow up after 1 year. The change in the buccal vertical bone level will be measured as the difference between the former and the new vertical distance from implant platform to the buccal alveolar crest. While the change in the buccal horizontal bone dimension will be measured as the difference between the former and the new horizontal distance between the implant and the outer surface of the buccal plate. Both measurements will be taken using CBCT, one immediately after the surgery and the other one 3 month later
Before surgery, immediately after surgery, 3 moth, 1 year follow up
The changes of stability of soft tissue
Recession (REC) state of the gingival/mucosa border - registered by means of a periodontal probe from the incisal edge to the border of the medial, zenith and distal zones. There are taken scans with 3Shape Trios4 before surgery, immediately after, then 3 month and 1 year follow up to compare soft tissue stability
Before surgery, immediately after surgery, 3 month, 1 year follow up
The change of position of implant using surgical guide
To compare implant position accuracy using surgical guide, the following two things will be compared: DICOM after the surgery witch contains information on the implant position in the bone and the STL file witch contains information on implant position before the surgery. There are taken cone beam computer tomography before and immediately after surgery, then 3 month and 1 year follow up.
Before surgery and immediately after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Kompozite closure
OTHERImmediate implant placement and temporary closure of tapered implants with a custom-made composite shaper after tooth extraction with bone augmentation by using allogeneic bone.
Individual abutment
OTHERImmediate implant placement and temporary closure of tapered implant with a custom-made zirconium oxide abutment after tooth extraction with bone augmentation by using allogeneic bone.
Interventions
Immediate implant placement and temporary closure of tapered implants with a custom-made composite shaper.
Immediate implant placement and temporary closure of tapered implant with a custom-made zirconium oxide abutment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and females at least 18 years of age or older.
- One implant per patient.
- Prior to any study-related activity, the subject must voluntarily sign informed consent, be willing and able to attend scheduled follow-up visits, and agree to the collection and analysis of pseudonymised data.
- Lateral individual teeth (premolars and molars).
- Class I extraction socket (intact buccal wall) or class II (1/3 of buccal wall).
- The gingival contour of the tooth to be extracted - without recession.
- Adjacent anterior teeth have no periodontal loss.
- There are no implants in the adjacent teeth.
- Non-traumatic tooth extraction, which results in intact walls of the socket.
You may not qualify if:
- Deep occlusion (severe, class II).
- The patient smokes a lot (more than 10 cigarettes per day).
- Systemic disease (osteoporosis).
- No initial stability has been achieved after the implant insertion procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- SIA Adentalead
Study Sites (1)
Adenta
Riga, Latvija, LV-1045, Latvia
Related Publications (4)
Alexopoulou M, Lambert F, Knafo B, Popelut A, Vandenberghe B, Finelle G. Immediate implant in the posterior region combined with alveolar ridge preservation and sealing socket abutment: A retrospective 3D radiographic analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Feb;23(1):61-72. doi: 10.1111/cid.12974. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
PMID: 33438320BACKGROUNDSanz-Martin I, Permuy M, Vignoletti F, Nunez J, Munoz F, Sanz M. A novel methodological approach using superimposed Micro-CT and STL images to analyze hard and soft tissue volume in immediate and delayed implants with different cervical designs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29(10):986-995. doi: 10.1111/clr.13365. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
PMID: 30246362BACKGROUNDGuidetti LG, Monnazzi MS, Piveta AC, Gabrielli MA, Gabrielli MF, Pereira Filho VA. Evaluation of single implants placed in the posterior mandibular area under immediate loading: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Nov;44(11):1411-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
PMID: 26194771BACKGROUNDGnusins V, Akhondi S, Zvirblis T, Pala K, Gallucci GO, Puisys A. Chairside vs Prefabricated Sealing Socket Abutments for Posterior Immediate Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Aug;27(4):e70076. doi: 10.1111/cid.70076.
PMID: 40692347DERIVED
Related Links
- Customized sealing socket abutment (SSA) has been claimed to optimize the peri-implant hard and soft tissues in type 1 implant placement.
- To study the hard and soft tissue volume after placing immediate (IMI) or delayed implants (DLI) with a triangular coronal macro-design (Test/T) or a conventional cylindrical design (Control/C).
- The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival of single dental implants subjected to immediate function. Twelve patients with edentulous areas in the posterior mandible were included in the study.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ģirts Šalms, Asoc.prof
Riga Stradiņš University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Each patient has their individual ID number
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor of dental Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 11, 2023
First Posted
February 28, 2023
Study Start
February 28, 2023
Primary Completion
May 22, 2024
Study Completion
May 22, 2025
Last Updated
May 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share