NCT05742711

Brief Summary

Pain relief following laparotomy surgery requires a variety of techniques including invasive ones like epidural or nerve blocks along with different classes of drugs, out of which opioids are most predominant. Each of these drugs have with their own set of advantages and also side effects. An ideal common system of analgesia is not possible due to patient variability. And no drug is devoid of side effects. Hence the aim is to ensure effective analgesia using drugs or techniques which are minimally invasive with negligible side effects.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 2, 2023

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 24, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 16, 2023

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 13, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 13, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 5, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

February 2, 2023

Last Update Submit

August 29, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    The primary goal is to evaluate the efficacy of PENS treatment in the change in postoperative pain after cancer surgery compared to the control group. The pain is measured using the numerical rating scale (NRS). Pain Score will be measured on a scale (0 = no pain;10 = worst imaginable pain; lower scores indicate better outcome)

    0 - 4 days; 0 hours, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 96 hours. Outcomes will be reported as an average over each individual postoperative day and as an average over 5 days independently for rest.

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Overall Postoperative analgesia and opioid requirement

    0 - 4 days, duration and dose of all prescriptions are recorded.

  • Patient Ambulation

    1 - 4 days; 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 96 hours.

  • Record of Participant Bowel Movement Patterns

    0 - 4 days; Whenever the patient experiences the bowel movement.

  • Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS)

    0 - 4 days; 0 hours, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 96 hours.

  • Patient Discomfort

    Time Frame: 0 - 4 days; Whenever the patient experiences the discomfort.

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Treatment Group

EXPERIMENTAL

The group who have received PENS treatment using PrimaryRelief in addition to Injection paracetamol in a dosage of 15mg/kg every 6th hourly. Break through pain with NRS\>4 will be managed with injection tramadol at 1mg/kg followed by 0.5mg/kg after 10mins in cases of persisting pain.

Device: Primary Relief

Control Group

SHAM COMPARATOR

The group who have received a sham device along with Injection paracetamol in a dosage of 15mg/kg every 6th hourly. Break through pain with NRS\>4 will be managed with injection tramadol at 1mg/kg followed by 0.5mg/kg after 10mins in cases of persisting pain.

Device: Primary Relief - Sham Device

Interventions

Continuous neurostimulation with a set of pre-assigned stimulation parameters.

Also known as: Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator (PENS)
Treatment Group

Standard treatment with the application of sham device shall be followed with additional analgesics available if necessary.

Also known as: Standard Treatment for Postoperative Pain
Control Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age \>18 yrs
  • Diagnosed with CA-endometrium OR CA -cervix of stage I/II and post RT CA cervix patients coming for hysterectomy
  • Elective surgery
  • Informed consent obtained
  • ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiology) physical status 1-3

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient refusal
  • Emergency surgery, Laparoscopic and robotic procedures
  • Unplanned postoperative ventilation
  • Allergy/sensitivity to adhesive
  • Active skin infection/lesion in the ear region
  • H/O of seizure or cerebral disease
  • H/O chronic pain and prolonged analgesic usage
  • H/O opioid dependence
  • H/O anxiety or psychiatric illness requiring treatment
  • Pre-existing implantable/ electronic on demand device
  • Patients who might require MRI in the study period
  • Patients with transmissible diseases
  • Patients with coagulopathies
  • Absolute or relative contraindication to drugs used in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cancer Institute,(Wia)

Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600020, India

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Arponrat P, Pongrojpaw D, Tanprasertkul C, Suwannarurk K, Bhamarapravatana K. Postoperative Pain Relief in Major Gynaecological Surgery by Perioperative Parecoxib Administration: Thammasat University Hospital Study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Jul;98(7):636-42.

  • Pogatzki-Zahn E, Kutschar P, Nestler N, Osterbrink J. A Prospective Multicentre Study to Improve Postoperative Pain: Identification of Potentialities and Problems. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 24;10(11):e0143508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143508. eCollection 2015.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Endometrial NeoplasmsUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Uterine NeoplasmsGenital Neoplasms, FemaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsUterine DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital DiseasesUterine Cervical Diseases

Study Officials

  • Dr. Sahithya Sriman, MBBS, MD

    Cancer Institue, WIA,

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2023

First Posted

February 24, 2023

Study Start

May 16, 2023

Primary Completion

January 13, 2025

Study Completion

January 13, 2025

Last Updated

September 5, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations