Evaluation of Case Management for First Episode Psychosis Using the PEPsy-CM Checklist
CHECKLISTPEP
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Psychotic disorders are often chronic conditions that lead to impaired functioning, quality of life and social integration. Current research and recommendations for good practice are moving towards early detection and intervention. It is recognized that this leads to better adherence, alliance to care and knowledge of pathology for the patient, especially in young patients. For more than a decade, early intervention services (EIS) are opened in France over an increasingly large territory. Still too few studies assess the impact of these structures in France. These EIS offer a multimodal intervention (social, professional, psychotherapeutic). The intervention of case managers (or care coordinators in french) seems to be the core of EIS. The case manager has a fundamental role in the process of recovery in coordinating each individual's treatment and ensuring continuity of care. The PEPsy-CM study aims to evaluate the effectiveness on the relapse rate of a 3 year Program for Early Psychosis based on Case Management (PEPsy-CM) compared to TAU in a population of young people with a FEP. A qualitative evaluation of case management practice in EIS seems essential to assess the impact of case managers under real conditions. Based on the Australian Good Practice Recommendations (EPICC integrity tools) and the case management practice manuals, the PEPsy-CM check-list questionnaire was developed to evaluate the practice of case management in the EIS in France. This check-list contains different 35 items. The final score between 1(poor) to 5 (good) is established to determine the quality of the case management. Qualitative data are also collected during the interview with the participants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Feb 2023
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 22, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2023
CompletedSeptember 21, 2023
September 1, 2023
7 months
December 22, 2022
September 18, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
conformity to TIDieR checklist in each center and for each case manager interviewed
TIDieR checklist Patient - Use of the case management manual (yes or no)
1 year
conformity to TIDieR checklist in each center and for each case manager interviewed
TIDieR checklist Patient - Use of specific and validated tools for Psychoeducation (yes or no)
1 year
conformity to TIDieR checklist in each center and for each case manager interviewed
TIDieR checklist Patient - Use of an information brochure on First Episode Psychosis (yes or no)
1 year
conformity to TIDieR checklist in each center and for each case manager interviewed
TIDieR checklist Patient - Use of specific and validated tools to support families (yes or no)
1 year
conformity to TIDieR checklist in each center and for each case manager interviewed
TIDieR checklist Patient - Use of specific and validated tools for Motivational Interviewing (yes or no)
1 year
conformity to TIDieR checklist in each center and for each case manager interviewed
TIDieR checklist Patient - Presence of Individualized Therapeutic Plan (ITP) supervision system (yes or no)
1 year
conformity to TIDieR checklist in each center and for each case manager interviewed
TIDieR checklist Patient - Use of Individualized Therapeutic Plan (ITP) supervision system (yes or no)
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
description of the global organisation of each center
1 year
description of their involvement in the early intervention center
1 year
Interventions
Evaluation of professional practices : evaluation of the case management carried out in a program for early psychosis in France using a checklist according good practices guidelines
Eligibility Criteria
Professional working in an early intervention center treating first episodes of psychosis
You may qualify if:
- Professional working in an early intervention center treating first episodes of psychosis
- Professional involved in the organization/management of the center or practicing case management.
You may not qualify if:
- Professional not working in the early intervention center
- Professional working in the early intervention center but not having a role in the organization or management of the center or as case manager
- Professional who does not take charge of people who have had a first psychotic episode
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Schandrin
Nîmes, 30029, France
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2022
First Posted
February 21, 2023
Study Start
February 1, 2023
Primary Completion
September 1, 2023
Study Completion
September 1, 2023
Last Updated
September 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09