NCT05729022

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the Microendoscopic combined with ultrasound technique to the standard routinely used X-ray guided transforaminal steroid injection technique.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
124

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 6, 2023

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 15, 2023

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

June 21, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

February 6, 2023

Last Update Submit

June 19, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Epidural InjectionsLumbar ManipulationFluoroscopyUltrasound

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Intervention success rate

    The success of the procedure would be indicated by a questionnaire (yes/no answer). This includes the success of visualization under ultrasound and the insertion of the needle within the target position.

    During the procedure.

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Patient satisfaction

    3 weeks after discharge.

  • NRS pain score

    Before procedure, 30 minutes after the procedure, 1 week and 3 weeks after the procedure.

  • Complications

    During procedure.

  • Procedure time

    Beginning of procedure till the end.

  • Ultrasound visibility

    During procedure.

Study Arms (2)

Fluoroscopy

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

A local anesthetic (2% lidocaine), a 22G, 90mm needle (Quincke spinal needle) is inserted into the skin. Once the needle tip is in its target position, 0.5-5 cc of contrast (Omnipauqe) is injected. If the contrast spread along the spinal nerve into the epidural space, a mixture of 3 cc of 0.125% Marcaine and 40 mg of Depo-Medrol is injected or Diprofos (1/2 ampoule (2 ml) per level).

Radiation: Fluoroscopy

Ultrasound Microendoscopic

EXPERIMENTAL

A US device with a curvilinear probe and with a microendoscope (EvoTouch+7 Star Scope), inserted into an 18G needle is used. This group will also receive one AP view fluoroscopy (as control) to check for the diffusion of the contrast material in the epidural space.

Device: Ultrasound microendoscopic technique

Interventions

Ultrasound-guided microendoscopic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection

Ultrasound Microendoscopic
FluoroscopyRADIATION

Fluoroscopy-guided lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection.

Fluoroscopy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 64 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 18 and 64 years old of either sex
  • Disease status of American Society of Anesthesiologists grades I to II
  • Patients presenting with single-level disc disease and radiculopathy (L2-L3; L3-L4; L4-L5) for steroid injection
  • Confirmation of herniated disk by CT or MRI
  • Able to give informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Age under 18 or over 64 years old
  • Pregnant women
  • Disease status of American Society of Anesthesiologists grades III to IV
  • Unable to provide an informed consent
  • Radiculopathies at multiple spinal levels
  • Non-lumbar herniated discs
  • Clinically obvious or known spinal deformity or stenosis
  • Previous spine surgery
  • Local or systemic infection
  • Allergy to steroids, anesthetics, or contrast material
  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy and patients on anticoagulation therapy
  • Patients who refuse the procedure
  • Spine tuberculosis or tumors
  • Prior injections within 3 months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

American University of Beirut Medical Center

Beirut, Lebanon

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Manchikanti L. Transforaminal lumbar epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician. 2000 Oct;3(4):374-98.

    PMID: 16906179BACKGROUND
  • Wu A, March L, Zheng X, Huang J, Wang X, Zhao J, Blyth FM, Smith E, Buchbinder R, Hoy D. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(6):299. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.175.

    PMID: 32355743BACKGROUND
  • Mehta N, Salaria M, Salaria AQ. Comparison of fluoroscopic Guided Transforaminal Epidural Injections of Steroid and Local Anaesthetic with Conservative Management in Patients with Chronic Lumbar Radiculopathies. Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):17-22. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.186868.

    PMID: 28298750BACKGROUND
  • Hashemi M, Dadkhah P, Taheri M, Haji Seyed Abootorabi SM, Naderi-Nabi B. Ultrasound-Guided Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injections; A Single Center Fluoroscopic Validation Study. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2019 Jul;7(3):251-255. doi: 10.29252/beat-070307.

    PMID: 31392224BACKGROUND
  • Jee H, Lee JH, Kim J, Park KD, Lee WY, Park Y. Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a randomized, blinded, controlled study. Skeletal Radiol. 2013 Jan;42(1):69-78. doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1434-1. Epub 2012 May 20.

    PMID: 22609989BACKGROUND
  • Engel A, King W, MacVicar J; Standards Division of the International Spine Intervention Society. The effectiveness and risks of fluoroscopically guided cervical transforaminal injections of steroids: a systematic review with comprehensive analysis of the published data. Pain Med. 2014 Mar;15(3):386-402. doi: 10.1111/pme.12304. Epub 2013 Dec 5.

    PMID: 24308846BACKGROUND
  • Yang G, Liu J, Ma L, Cai Z, Meng C, Qi S, Zhou H. Ultrasound-guided Versus Fluoroscopy-controlled Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injections: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin J Pain. 2016 Feb;32(2):103-8. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000237.

    PMID: 25803759BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Intervertebral disc disease

Study Officials

  • Marwan Rizk, MD

    American University of Beirut Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Marwan Rizk, MD

CONTACT

Thouraya HajAli, MSc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2023

First Posted

February 15, 2023

Study Start

December 1, 2024

Primary Completion

December 1, 2025

Study Completion

December 1, 2025

Last Updated

June 21, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations