Ultrasound-Guided Microendoscopic Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections
1 other identifier
interventional
124
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the Microendoscopic combined with ultrasound technique to the standard routinely used X-ray guided transforaminal steroid injection technique.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedJune 21, 2024
June 1, 2024
1 year
February 6, 2023
June 19, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intervention success rate
The success of the procedure would be indicated by a questionnaire (yes/no answer). This includes the success of visualization under ultrasound and the insertion of the needle within the target position.
During the procedure.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Patient satisfaction
3 weeks after discharge.
NRS pain score
Before procedure, 30 minutes after the procedure, 1 week and 3 weeks after the procedure.
Complications
During procedure.
Procedure time
Beginning of procedure till the end.
Ultrasound visibility
During procedure.
Study Arms (2)
Fluoroscopy
PLACEBO COMPARATORA local anesthetic (2% lidocaine), a 22G, 90mm needle (Quincke spinal needle) is inserted into the skin. Once the needle tip is in its target position, 0.5-5 cc of contrast (Omnipauqe) is injected. If the contrast spread along the spinal nerve into the epidural space, a mixture of 3 cc of 0.125% Marcaine and 40 mg of Depo-Medrol is injected or Diprofos (1/2 ampoule (2 ml) per level).
Ultrasound Microendoscopic
EXPERIMENTALA US device with a curvilinear probe and with a microendoscope (EvoTouch+7 Star Scope), inserted into an 18G needle is used. This group will also receive one AP view fluoroscopy (as control) to check for the diffusion of the contrast material in the epidural space.
Interventions
Ultrasound-guided microendoscopic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 64 years old of either sex
- Disease status of American Society of Anesthesiologists grades I to II
- Patients presenting with single-level disc disease and radiculopathy (L2-L3; L3-L4; L4-L5) for steroid injection
- Confirmation of herniated disk by CT or MRI
- Able to give informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Age under 18 or over 64 years old
- Pregnant women
- Disease status of American Society of Anesthesiologists grades III to IV
- Unable to provide an informed consent
- Radiculopathies at multiple spinal levels
- Non-lumbar herniated discs
- Clinically obvious or known spinal deformity or stenosis
- Previous spine surgery
- Local or systemic infection
- Allergy to steroids, anesthetics, or contrast material
- Uncorrectable coagulopathy and patients on anticoagulation therapy
- Patients who refuse the procedure
- Spine tuberculosis or tumors
- Prior injections within 3 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- American University of Beirut Medical Centerlead
- Quantel Medicalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
American University of Beirut Medical Center
Beirut, Lebanon
Related Publications (7)
Manchikanti L. Transforaminal lumbar epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician. 2000 Oct;3(4):374-98.
PMID: 16906179BACKGROUNDWu A, March L, Zheng X, Huang J, Wang X, Zhao J, Blyth FM, Smith E, Buchbinder R, Hoy D. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(6):299. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.175.
PMID: 32355743BACKGROUNDMehta N, Salaria M, Salaria AQ. Comparison of fluoroscopic Guided Transforaminal Epidural Injections of Steroid and Local Anaesthetic with Conservative Management in Patients with Chronic Lumbar Radiculopathies. Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):17-22. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.186868.
PMID: 28298750BACKGROUNDHashemi M, Dadkhah P, Taheri M, Haji Seyed Abootorabi SM, Naderi-Nabi B. Ultrasound-Guided Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injections; A Single Center Fluoroscopic Validation Study. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2019 Jul;7(3):251-255. doi: 10.29252/beat-070307.
PMID: 31392224BACKGROUNDJee H, Lee JH, Kim J, Park KD, Lee WY, Park Y. Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a randomized, blinded, controlled study. Skeletal Radiol. 2013 Jan;42(1):69-78. doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1434-1. Epub 2012 May 20.
PMID: 22609989BACKGROUNDEngel A, King W, MacVicar J; Standards Division of the International Spine Intervention Society. The effectiveness and risks of fluoroscopically guided cervical transforaminal injections of steroids: a systematic review with comprehensive analysis of the published data. Pain Med. 2014 Mar;15(3):386-402. doi: 10.1111/pme.12304. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
PMID: 24308846BACKGROUNDYang G, Liu J, Ma L, Cai Z, Meng C, Qi S, Zhou H. Ultrasound-guided Versus Fluoroscopy-controlled Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injections: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin J Pain. 2016 Feb;32(2):103-8. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000237.
PMID: 25803759BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marwan Rizk, MD
American University of Beirut Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2023
First Posted
February 15, 2023
Study Start
December 1, 2024
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
June 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share