NCT05725265

Brief Summary

This study is conducted to compare between efficacy of large and small area of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in treatment of post mastectomy lymphedema. The change of severity of BCRL will be measured by the difference of circumference and skin thickness, detected by ultrasound. The influence on clinical symptoms, such as pain, shoulder mobility and hand function, are also investigated in the study.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
54

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 8, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 13, 2023

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 24, 2023

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

October 18, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

January 8, 2023

Last Update Submit

October 16, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Breast Cancer LymphedemaLymphedemaBreast cancerLow level laser therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Circumference discrepancy of bilateral upper arm

    Record the circumference of arm and forearm of involved and uninvolved upper extremity at 4 cm segment from cubital fossa and calculate the circumference discrepancy.

    Day 30 (change of circumference discrepancy of bilateral upper limbs, comparing with the data in baseline) of each section

  • Circumference discrepancy of bilateral upper arm

    Record the circumference of arm and forearm of involved and uninvolved upper extremity at 4 cm segment from cubital fossa and calculate the circumference discrepancy.

    Day 60 (change of circumference discrepancy of bilateral upper limbs, comparing with the data in baseline) of each section

  • Circumference discrepancy of bilateral upper arm

    Record the circumference of arm and forearm of involved and uninvolved upper extremity at 4 cm segment from cubital fossa and calculate the circumference discrepancy.

    Day 120 (change of circumference discrepancy of bilateral upper limbs, comparing with the data in baseline) of each section

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • visual analogue scale (VAS)

    Day 30, Day 60, Day 120 (comparing with the data in baseline) of each section

  • Range of motion of involved shoulder

    Day 30, Day 60, Day 120 (comparing with the data in baseline) of each section

  • Skin thickness

    Day 30, Day 60, Day 120 (comparing with the data in baseline) of each section

  • QuickDASH

    Day 30, Day 60, Day 120 (comparing with the data in baseline) of each section

Study Arms (2)

Large-area low-level laser therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Large-area low-level laser therapy(Venusure) was administered at proximal forearm, upper arm and axillary region of affected side. The wavelength was 980±15nm, average dose was 10-40nm/cm2 and maximal output was 1000mW. Total treatment duration was 30 min and frequency was 3 sessions/week for 4 weeks.

Device: Large-area low-level laser therapy(Venusure)

Conventional low-level laser therapy

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Conventional low-level laser therapy was administrated on antecubital fossa and the axilla of affected side. The wavelength was 808nm and maximal output was 60 mW. Total treatment duration was 30 min and frequency was 3 sessions/week for 4 weeks.

Device: Conventional low-level laser therapy

Interventions

The wavelength was 980±15nm, average dose was 10-40nm/cm2 and maximal output was 1000mW. Total treatment duration was 30 min and frequency was 3 sessions/week for 4 weeks; for a total of 12 sessions

Large-area low-level laser therapy

The wavelength was 808 nm and maximal output was 60 mW. Total treatment duration was 30 min and frequency was 3 sessions/week for 4 weeks; for a total of 12 sessions.

Conventional low-level laser therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Female subjects, 20 years age or older, suffered from unilateral breast cancer with ipsilateral lumpectomy or mastectomy and lymph node dissection (sentinel biopsy or axillary dissection)
  • Stage I or II unilateral secondary upper extremity lymphedema(as defined by the International Society of Lymphology)
  • Girth≥ 2 cm circumferential difference compared with the uninvolved upper extremity at any 4 cm segment
  • Able to commit to a long-term follow-up schedule

You may not qualify if:

  • Metastatic cancer(stage IV)
  • Pregnancy
  • Presence of other extremity lymphedema (primary or secondary)
  • History of deep vein thrombosis
  • Pacemaker
  • Artificial joints, implant or tattoo(area≥4 cm2) at the involved upper extremity
  • Previous treatment with low-level laser therapy (within 3 months)
  • Body mass index (BMI) \> 35 (morbid obesity)
  • High bleeding tendency(hemophilia)
  • Receiving long-term steroid treatment (oral or systemic)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, Taiwan

RECRUITING

Related Publications (11)

  • DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):500-15. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70076-7. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

    PMID: 23540561BACKGROUND
  • Grada AA, Phillips TJ. Lymphedema: Pathophysiology and clinical manifestations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Dec;77(6):1009-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.03.022.

    PMID: 29132848BACKGROUND
  • Eyigor S, Cinar E, Caramat I, Unlu BK. Factors influencing response to lymphedema treatment in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Sep;23(9):2705-10. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2633-9. Epub 2015 Feb 8.

    PMID: 25663541BACKGROUND
  • Mellor RH, Bush NL, Stanton AW, Bamber JC, Levick JR, Mortimer PS. Dual-frequency ultrasound examination of skin and subcutis thickness in breast cancer-related lymphedema. Breast J. 2004 Nov-Dec;10(6):496-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21458.x.

    PMID: 15569205BACKGROUND
  • Swenson KK, Nissen MJ, Ceronsky C, Swenson L, Lee MW, Tuttle TM. Comparison of side effects between sentinel lymph node and axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002 Oct;9(8):745-53. doi: 10.1007/BF02574496.

    PMID: 12374657BACKGROUND
  • Verbelen H, Gebruers N, Eeckhout FM, Verlinden K, Tjalma W. Shoulder and arm morbidity in sentinel node-negative breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Feb;144(1):21-31. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2846-5. Epub 2014 Feb 5.

    PMID: 24496928BACKGROUND
  • Lee D, Hwang JH, Chu I, Chang HJ, Shim YH, Kim JH. Analysis of factors related to arm weakness in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Aug;23(8):2297-304. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2584-6. Epub 2015 Jan 10.

    PMID: 25576430BACKGROUND
  • Smile TD, Tendulkar R, Schwarz G, Arthur D, Grobmyer S, Valente S, Vicini F, Shah C. A Review of Treatment for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Paradigms for Clinical Practice. Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;41(2):178-190. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000355.

    PMID: 28009597BACKGROUND
  • Robijns J, Censabella S, Bulens P, Maes A, Mebis J. The use of low-level light therapy in supportive care for patients with breast cancer: review of the literature. Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Jan;32(1):229-242. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-2056-y. Epub 2016 Aug 19.

    PMID: 27539464BACKGROUND
  • Wang Y, Ge Y, Xing W, Liu J, Wu J, Lin H, Lu Y. The effectiveness and safety of low-level laser therapy on breast cancer-related lymphedema: An overview and update of systematic reviews. Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Apr;37(3):1389-1413. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03446-3. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

    PMID: 34779937BACKGROUND
  • Levenhagen K, Davies C, Perdomo M, Ryans K, Gilchrist L. Diagnosis of Upper Quadrant Lymphedema Secondary to Cancer: Clinical Practice Guideline From the Oncology Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. Phys Ther. 2017 Jul 1;97(7):729-745. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx050.

    PMID: 28838217BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer LymphedemaLymphedemaBreast Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lymphatic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • Chueh-Hung Wu, PHD

    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Ying-Chun Chen, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2023

First Posted

February 13, 2023

Study Start

October 24, 2023

Primary Completion

July 31, 2025

Study Completion

October 31, 2025

Last Updated

October 18, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations