NIVATS Versus IGAVATS: a Pilot Trial Addressing Biopsy Quality in Undetermined Interstitial Lung Diseases
NIVATS-2
Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery for Lung Biopsy Using Non-intubated (NIVATS) Versus Intubated General Anaesthesia (IGAVATS): a Randomized, Controlled, Pilot Trial Addressing Biopsy Quality in Undetermined Interstitial Lung Diseases
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to compare two independent groups of patients requiring lung biopsy for undetermined interstitial lung disease (ILD) in terms of diagnostic confidence as determined by histologists.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 18, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 24, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 24, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 24, 2026
April 2, 2026
December 1, 2025
3.5 years
January 18, 2023
March 27, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The level of diagnostic confidence based on centralized histology only
The level of diagnostic confidence for a given diagnosis is established according to a quantitative scale ranging from '0' (absolute rule-out) to '10' (diagnostic certainty). A visual guide for scale use is provided with scores \<1 corresponding to "alternate diagnosis", scores \>=1 and \<4 corresponding to "indeterminate", scores \>=4 and \<7 corresponding to "probable", and scores \>=7 corresponding to "highly probable" categories.
Day 1 to day 15
Secondary Outcomes (39)
The level of diagnostic confidence based on routine histology only
Day 1 to day 15
The level of diagnostic confidence achieved at multidisciplinary assessment (MDA)-2
Day 7 to day 28
Change in the level of diagnostic confidence for the most favoured diagnosis between multidisciplinary assessment (MDA)-1 and multidisciplinary assessment (MDA)-2
Day 7 to day 28
Classification according to ATS/ERS at MDA-1
Day -28 to day -3
Classification according to ATS/ERS at MDA-2
Day 7 to day 28
- +34 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
NIVATS
EXPERIMENTALLung biopsy is performed using non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery (NIVATS).
IGAVATS
ACTIVE COMPARATORLung biopsy is performed using Intubated general anaesthesia video-assisted thoracic surgery (IGAVATS).
Interventions
Uses a traditional deep anaesthesia and one-lung ventilation
An epidural anaesthesia associated with mild sedation requiring no ventilation is used.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with purported interstitial lung disease
- Patient requiring a surgical lung biopsy to reinforce diagnosis according to current recommendations and validated by a multidisciplinary assessment
- Minimum age: 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- Contra-indication for surgery
- Uncontrolled oesophageal gastric reflux despite optimal treatment
- Thoracic deformation (For example, pectus excavatum/carinatum or major scoliosis)
- Risk of pleural adhesion (For example, patient who has already undergone thoracic surgery)
- History of abnormal bleeding
- Predictable risk of difficult intubation
- Body mass index (BMI) \> 30
- Severe cardiovascular comorbidity (For example, instable ischemic cardiomyopathy)
- Unable to comply with all trial procedures/visits (For example, language barriers, upcoming move of household to another region, unwillingness to schedule the required followup visits.)
- Protected populations according to the French Public Health Code Articles L1121-5,6,8 (For example, pregnant, parturient or lactating women, prisoners, adults under guardianship or otherwise unable to consent.)
- Non-beneficiary of the French single-payer national medical insurance system
- Lack of signed informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Département d'Anesthésie et Réanimation Cardiothoracique - CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve
Montpellier, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- To assure the blinding of non-surgical study staff (MDA participants, histologists, etc), allocation results in the electronic case report (eCRF) form are made available to designated surgical staff only. Patients, investigators / outcome assessors / care givers and study staff are blinded to allocation results in as much as possible. Only designated surgical staff (identified prior to centre initiation and kept to a strict necessary minimum) not otherwise involved in outcome assessment or patient care have access to allocation results on the eCRF and are summoned to maintain secrecy. Data analysts will not be involved in trial field logistics and will be blinded. During analyses, when group assignments are first required, they will only be revealed as "group A" or "group B". Only when analyses have been completed will the exact nature of groups be revealed.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2023
First Posted
February 10, 2023
Study Start
May 24, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 24, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 24, 2026
Last Updated
April 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- Datasets that underlie the results reported in the article (text, tables, figures, and appendices) can be requested after the publication process has been completed. The study protocol will be published in an open-access, peer-reviewed journal. Other key documents will be made available on the Open Science Framework as they are finalized.
- Access Criteria
- The conditions under which members of the public will be granted access to datasets are: * The data will be used/examined in a not-for-profit manner; * The data will not be used in an attempt to identify a participant or group of participants; * The user does not work for a private insurance company; * The data will not be used in support of any kind of private insurance policy or health penalties; * The data will be used/examined for the advancement of science/teaching while respecting participant/patient privacy and rights; * The user will state why they wish to access the data. * If the data do not fulfil the requirements of the reference methodology (MR-00X) (ex: data about religion, etc.), the appropriate CNIL approval has to be obtained by the user. * If the data will be used outside the European Union, standard contractual clauses have to be signed between Montpellier University Hospital and the user before sharing data.
The general goal is to make the study data available to interested researchers as well as to provide proof of transparency for the study. Data will be made available to persons who address a reasonable request to the study director. Individual participant data (and an accompanying data dictionary) will be de-identified and potentially further cleaned or aggregated as the investigators deem necessary to protect participant anonymity. The study protocol, participant Information materials, worksheet and data sharing plan will also be made available to the public.