NCT05722340

Brief Summary

The main objective of this study is to compare two independent groups of patients requiring lung biopsy for undetermined interstitial lung disease (ILD) in terms of diagnostic confidence as determined by histologists.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
6mo left

Started May 2023

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress86%
May 2023Nov 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 18, 2023

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 10, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 24, 2023

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 24, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 24, 2026

Last Updated

April 2, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.5 years

First QC Date

January 18, 2023

Last Update Submit

March 27, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The level of diagnostic confidence based on centralized histology only

    The level of diagnostic confidence for a given diagnosis is established according to a quantitative scale ranging from '0' (absolute rule-out) to '10' (diagnostic certainty). A visual guide for scale use is provided with scores \<1 corresponding to "alternate diagnosis", scores \>=1 and \<4 corresponding to "indeterminate", scores \>=4 and \<7 corresponding to "probable", and scores \>=7 corresponding to "highly probable" categories.

    Day 1 to day 15

Secondary Outcomes (39)

  • The level of diagnostic confidence based on routine histology only

    Day 1 to day 15

  • The level of diagnostic confidence achieved at multidisciplinary assessment (MDA)-2

    Day 7 to day 28

  • Change in the level of diagnostic confidence for the most favoured diagnosis between multidisciplinary assessment (MDA)-1 and multidisciplinary assessment (MDA)-2

    Day 7 to day 28

  • Classification according to ATS/ERS at MDA-1

    Day -28 to day -3

  • Classification according to ATS/ERS at MDA-2

    Day 7 to day 28

  • +34 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

NIVATS

EXPERIMENTAL

Lung biopsy is performed using non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery (NIVATS).

Procedure: Non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery (NIVATS) for lung biopsy

IGAVATS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Lung biopsy is performed using Intubated general anaesthesia video-assisted thoracic surgery (IGAVATS).

Procedure: Intubated general anaesthesia video-assisted thoracic surgery (IGAVATS) for lung biopsy

Interventions

Uses a traditional deep anaesthesia and one-lung ventilation

IGAVATS

An epidural anaesthesia associated with mild sedation requiring no ventilation is used.

NIVATS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient with purported interstitial lung disease
  • Patient requiring a surgical lung biopsy to reinforce diagnosis according to current recommendations and validated by a multidisciplinary assessment
  • Minimum age: 18 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Contra-indication for surgery
  • Uncontrolled oesophageal gastric reflux despite optimal treatment
  • Thoracic deformation (For example, pectus excavatum/carinatum or major scoliosis)
  • Risk of pleural adhesion (For example, patient who has already undergone thoracic surgery)
  • History of abnormal bleeding
  • Predictable risk of difficult intubation
  • Body mass index (BMI) \> 30
  • Severe cardiovascular comorbidity (For example, instable ischemic cardiomyopathy)
  • Unable to comply with all trial procedures/visits (For example, language barriers, upcoming move of household to another region, unwillingness to schedule the required followup visits.)
  • Protected populations according to the French Public Health Code Articles L1121-5,6,8 (For example, pregnant, parturient or lactating women, prisoners, adults under guardianship or otherwise unable to consent.)
  • Non-beneficiary of the French single-payer national medical insurance system
  • Lack of signed informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Département d'Anesthésie et Réanimation Cardiothoracique - CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve

Montpellier, France

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lung Diseases, Interstitial

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Timothée JOUITTEAU, Doctor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
To assure the blinding of non-surgical study staff (MDA participants, histologists, etc), allocation results in the electronic case report (eCRF) form are made available to designated surgical staff only. Patients, investigators / outcome assessors / care givers and study staff are blinded to allocation results in as much as possible. Only designated surgical staff (identified prior to centre initiation and kept to a strict necessary minimum) not otherwise involved in outcome assessment or patient care have access to allocation results on the eCRF and are summoned to maintain secrecy. Data analysts will not be involved in trial field logistics and will be blinded. During analyses, when group assignments are first required, they will only be revealed as "group A" or "group B". Only when analyses have been completed will the exact nature of groups be revealed.
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: In this prospective, parallel group, randomized (1:1), controlled, pilot trial, screening will take place during routine multidisciplinary assessment (MDA) meetings. The study is then presented to eligible patients during their next pre-surgical visits; if the patients are interested in participating, informed consent procedures are completed (again during routine visits) and the patients are randomized to two arms. In the experimental arm, patients will undergo NIVATS for lung biopsy, and in the standard arm, patients will undergo traditional IGAVATS for lung biopsy. Histology is then performed as usual, before entering a centralized pathway for a second analysis by an expert external to the study, and a second routine MDA convened (both blinded to study arms). Patients are followed-up for 12 months.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2023

First Posted

February 10, 2023

Study Start

May 24, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 24, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 24, 2026

Last Updated

April 2, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The general goal is to make the study data available to interested researchers as well as to provide proof of transparency for the study. Data will be made available to persons who address a reasonable request to the study director. Individual participant data (and an accompanying data dictionary) will be de-identified and potentially further cleaned or aggregated as the investigators deem necessary to protect participant anonymity. The study protocol, participant Information materials, worksheet and data sharing plan will also be made available to the public.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
Time Frame
Datasets that underlie the results reported in the article (text, tables, figures, and appendices) can be requested after the publication process has been completed. The study protocol will be published in an open-access, peer-reviewed journal. Other key documents will be made available on the Open Science Framework as they are finalized.
Access Criteria
The conditions under which members of the public will be granted access to datasets are: * The data will be used/examined in a not-for-profit manner; * The data will not be used in an attempt to identify a participant or group of participants; * The user does not work for a private insurance company; * The data will not be used in support of any kind of private insurance policy or health penalties; * The data will be used/examined for the advancement of science/teaching while respecting participant/patient privacy and rights; * The user will state why they wish to access the data. * If the data do not fulfil the requirements of the reference methodology (MR-00X) (ex: data about religion, etc.), the appropriate CNIL approval has to be obtained by the user. * If the data will be used outside the European Union, standard contractual clauses have to be signed between Montpellier University Hospital and the user before sharing data.
More information

Locations