The Effect of Different Altitude Levels on Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Section Surgery
altitude
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the researchers in this prospective study is to determine the differences, if any, in terms of anesthetic parameters among pregnant women who live at different altitudes and undergo cesarean section under neuraxial anesthesia under elective conditions and to contribute to the literature.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 28, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 28, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 15, 2023
CompletedMay 8, 2024
May 1, 2024
2 months
November 28, 2022
May 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
age
18-40 age frame
preoperative period
Body max index
kg/m2
preoperative period
heart rate
beats/min
during the surgery
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)
ASA I and II
preoperative period
mean arterial pressure
mmHg
during the surgery
The number and duration of spinal anesthesia applications
second
during the surgery
the duration of sensory block formation in the T6 dermatome
second
during the surgery
the time to reach each score of the MB(Modified bromage scale) scale 1-2-3
second
during the surgery
the duration of the operation (time from the beginning of the surgical incision to the completion of the surgery)
minute
during the surgery
the highest level of sensory block
dermatome level
during the surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
postoperative block parameters
postoperative first 24 hour
postoperative headache parameter
postoperative first and 7. day
postoperative nausea and vomiting parameter
postoperative first 24 hour
Study Arms (3)
sea levelaltitude
ACTIVE COMPARATORPregnant women living in Giresun(sea levelaltitude),Turkey and undergoing cesarean section under elective conditions.
moderate altitude
ACTIVE COMPARATORPregnant women living in Çorum(moderate altitude),Turkey and undergoing cesarean section under elective conditions.
high altitude
ACTIVE COMPARATORPregnant women living in Van(high altitude),Turkey and undergoing cesarean section under elective conditions.
Interventions
The same anesthesia protocol will be applied to the patient group at each altitude. In the sitting position, the spinal space was entered with a 25 gauge Quincke-tipped needle from the L4-5 space and a drop of CSF will be dripped onto the pH paper. Immediately afterwards, 12 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine will be given. The color formed on the pH paper will be noted. Sensory block level will be tested with pinprick test and motor block level will be evaluated with Modified Bromage scale. The number and duration of spinal anesthesia applications, the time of occurrence of sensory block in the T6 dermatome, the time to reach each score of the MB scale, the duration of the operation, the highest level of sensory block and anesthetic complications will be recorded. Sensory block time and motor block time of the patients followed in the service will be recorded.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old
- Pregnant women 160-170 centimeters tall
- Be residing in the place of participation for at least 1 month
You may not qualify if:
- \>ASA 2 pregnant women
- Contraindicated for spinal anesthesia, such as infection or coagulation disorder at the needle insertion site
- Pregnant women to be taken under emergency conditions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gıresun gynecology and children's hospital
Giresun, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (8)
Leissner KB, Mahmood FU. Physiology and pathophysiology at high altitude: considerations for the anesthesiologist. J Anesth. 2009;23(4):543-53. doi: 10.1007/s00540-009-0787-7. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
PMID: 19921365RESULTPenaloza D, Arias-Stella J. The heart and pulmonary circulation at high altitudes: healthy highlanders and chronic mountain sickness. Circulation. 2007 Mar 6;115(9):1132-46. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.624544.
PMID: 17339571RESULTWilson MH, Edsell ME, Davagnanam I, Hirani SP, Martin DS, Levett DZ, Thornton JS, Golay X, Strycharczuk L, Newman SP, Montgomery HE, Grocott MP, Imray CH; Caudwell Xtreme Everest Research Group. Cerebral artery dilatation maintains cerebral oxygenation at extreme altitude and in acute hypoxia--an ultrasound and MRI study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011 Oct;31(10):2019-29. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.81. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
PMID: 21654697RESULTBlayo MC, Coudert J, Pocidalo JJ. Ccomparison of cisternal and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pH in high altitude natives. Pflugers Arch. 1975 Apr 29;356(2):159-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00584295.
PMID: 239384RESULTSorensen SC, Milledge JS. Cerebrospinal fluid acid-base composition at high altitude. J Appl Physiol. 1971 Jul;31(1):28-30. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1971.31.1.28. No abstract available.
PMID: 5556959RESULTCarpenter RL, Hogan QH, Liu SS, Crane B, Moore J. Lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid volume is the primary determinant of sensory block extent and duration during spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1998 Jul;89(1):24-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199807000-00007.
PMID: 9667290RESULTHocking G, Wildsmith JA. Intrathecal drug spread. Br J Anaesth. 2004 Oct;93(4):568-78. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh204. Epub 2004 Jun 25. No abstract available.
PMID: 15220175RESULTAksoy M, Ince I, Ahiskalioglu A, Karaca O, Bayar F, Erdem AF. Spinal anaesthesia at low and moderately high altitudes: a comparison of anaesthetic parameters and hemodynamic changes. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Sep 10;15:123. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0104-y.
PMID: 26357836RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dilek Yeniay
Giresun Universıty TURKEY
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesiology and Reanimation physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 28, 2022
First Posted
February 8, 2023
Study Start
February 1, 2023
Primary Completion
March 28, 2023
Study Completion
April 15, 2023
Last Updated
May 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05