Adaptive Symptom Self-Management Immunotherapy Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
400
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), alone or in combination with other cancer treatments is increasing dramatically with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) common (90%) during ICI treatment. Most irAEs are symptomatic and symptom self-management with timely reporting of moderate or severe symptoms to health care providers (HCPs) may reduce irAE severity by early recognition and management, resulting in fewer treatment interruptions and unscheduled health services.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started May 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable breast-cancer
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 8, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2027
May 11, 2025
May 1, 2025
4 years
January 27, 2023
May 6, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in patient reported psychological distress in Interviews.
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has been developed using sophisticated measurement techniques, tested with over 21,000 individuals, calibrated to produce t-scores based on the general population and are available in either English or Spanish. The available short forms have evidence of good reliability and validity. PROMIS-short form 8 for depression and anxiety will be administered at baseline and 17-week telephone interviews to provide greater detail and precision in the measurement of severity of these symptoms, as compared to three PRO-CTCAE items (anxious, discouraged, sad). Each question is rated on a five-point scale from 1=Never to 5=Always. A higher score indicates higher anxiety or depression.The study team chose 8-item short forms to minimize respondent burden while maintaining measurement precision.
PROMIS short form 8 for depression and anxiety will be administered at baseline (week 0) and again at week 17 as part of the final follow-up.
Change in reported PRO-CTCAE Symptoms
Psychological distress and other symptoms will be measured weekly using PRO-CTCAE severity items at weeks 0-17. Severity is rated 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe. The 3 items reflecting psychological distress are anxious, discouraged, and sad. Other items relevant to ICI treatment were selected from the PRO-CTCAE library for a total of 23 items (e.g., nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, swelling, rash, increased sweating, heart palpitations, etc.). In addition to PRO-CTCAE, the study team will use data on the grades of irAEs documented by clinicians in the HER. Each of 3 item sets, the three PRO-CTCAE items of psychological distress, 23 other PRO-CTCAE items, and clinician documented irAEs will be summarized into three toxicity indices (TIs). All grades of the included items will be ordered from highest to lowest, and the weighted sum will be calculated.
PRO-CTCAE will be administered weekly at baseline (week 0) through week 17.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in cancer treatment interruptions
Cancer treatment interruptions will be measured after the final week 17 follow-up and take into account the participant's time on study (consent date through week 17 interview date).
Change in unscheduled health care visits
Unscheduled health care visits will be measured at baseline and week 17.
Study Arms (2)
Adaptive Intervention
EXPERIMENTALThe adaptive intervention sequence is assumed to affect psychological distress (depression and anxiety) severity of other symptoms and irAEs, as tested in Aim 1. Both the Automated Telephone Symptom Management (ATSM) system and the Telephone Interpersonal Counseling (TIP-C) interventions help participants to identify and understand troublesome symptoms, with suggestions to effectively self-manage these symptoms. The proposed interventions are expected to alleviate burdensome symptoms through several key mediating variables, as tested in Aim 2.
Active Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORSurvivors in the active control will receive weekly AVR assessments of PROCTCAE symptoms, and summary of these assessments will be sent securely to HCPs. Survivors will not receive the Handbook and will not be prompted by the AVR to contact HCPs unless the symptoms are severe. An active control comparator was purposively selected to enable a more rigorous testing of intervention effectiveness in Aims 1 and 2. Also, the study team will be better able to address the question about which channel of communication (automated versus survivor initiated) results in better outcomes.
Interventions
Participants randomized to the adaptive intervention are telephoned weekly and asked to enter by pin-pad or voice the severity of the PRO-CTCAE items on a 0-4 scale, with 0 being none and 4 being very severe. Participants are mailed the Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook in their preferred language (English or Spanish). Survivors who rated any item at moderate or higher (2-4) will be referred by the ATSM to read the corresponding chapters in the Handbook and given a call back in 24 hours to inquire about the severity of the reported symptom, whether it has improved or worsened, and whether the participant reported it to their HCP, or the HCP has contacted the survivor. Participants that report elevated symptoms for two consecutive weeks are rerandomized to continue the ATSM alone or continue the ATSM with TIP-C added for 8 weeks. TIP-C is delivered by a masters prepared counselor with cancer expertise via weekly 30-minute phone calls using interpersonal techniques.
Survivors in the active control will receive weekly AVR assessments of PROCTCAE symptoms, and summary of these assessments will be sent securely to HCPs. Survivors will not receive the Handbook and will not be prompted by the AVR to contact HCPs unless the symptoms are severe.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 or older
- Within 12 weeks after starting ICI treatment for cancer
- Cognitively oriented to person, place and time (determined by recruiter)
- Able to speak and understand English or Spanish
- Access to a telephone
- Severity score of 1 (mild) or higher on at least 1 of the 3 indicators of psychological distress from the PRO-CTCAE (i.e., the three items of anxious, discouraged, sad) library
You may not qualify if:
- Currently receiving regular behavioral counseling
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Arizonalead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (3)
Valleywise Health Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85008, United States
University of Arizona Cancer Center
Tucson, Arizona, 85724, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Terry Badger, PhD
University of Arizona
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2023
First Posted
February 6, 2023
Study Start
May 8, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Last Updated
May 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Quality assurance and data analysis will be done on a quarterly basis.
- Access Criteria
- Data from this study will be available to other researchers under the following conditions: 1) appropriate human subjects protection is in place; 2) data have been de-identified; and 3) study investigators have publicly presented and published key findings. A data and safety monitoring plan for this study is in place and described under Human Subjects within the protocol.
Participant data will be shared with Dr. Alla Sikorski as she is the statistician for our research team and leads data analysis, interpretation of the results, and report writing. Dr. Sikorski will perform quality assurance checks, data analysis, data management, etc. De-identified data will be transferred into SAS 9.4 for such analysis. All errors are corrected during the QA check. Dr. Sikorskii will oversee preparation of data reports.