Pilot Study of Mothers and Babies Online in Home Visiting
eMB
Understanding the Needs of Parents and Providers With Mothers and Babies Online (eMB): A User Centered Approach
2 other identifiers
interventional
42
1 country
6
Brief Summary
The investigators propose a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) that examines how the redesigned version of Mothers and Babies Online (eMB) can be delivered in the context of home visiting (HV) programs that serve pregnant individuals and new mothers across the United States. The PI, Dr. Darius Tandon (Northwestern University), has conducted extensive research on the in-person Mothers and Babies (MB) intervention with HV programs and has received interest from one of the largest HV models-Parents as Teachers (PAT)-to explore the use of eMB with pregnant individuals that they serve.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2023
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 25, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2024
CompletedDecember 13, 2024
December 1, 2024
1.6 years
January 25, 2023
December 11, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in depressive symptoms
Depression will be assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, which is a 20-item measure that asks participants to rate how often over the past week they experienced symptoms associated with depression, such as restless sleep, poor appetite, and feeling lonely. Scores range from 0-60 with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptomatology
T1 (prior to starting intervention), T2 (1 week post-intervention), T3 (3 months post-intervention)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in perceived stress
T1 (prior to starting intervention), T2 (1 week post-intervention), T3 (3 months post-intervention)
Change in anxiety symptoms
T1 (prior to starting intervention), T2 (1 week post-intervention), T3 (3 months post-intervention)
Change in parenting sense of competence
T1 (prior to starting intervention), T2 (1 week post-intervention), T3 (3 months post-intervention)
Chang in dimensions of couple relationships
T1 (prior to starting intervention), T2 (1 week post-intervention), T3 (3 months post-intervention)
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALeMB consists of 8 sessions that correspond with key cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) elements: pleasant activities, thoughts, and social support/contact with others. Integrated throughout eMB are activities and skills based on attachment theory that emphasize how each CBT module relates to promoting a strong, nurturing connection between parent and child. eMB includes informational pages, short audio/video clips, images of infants and pregnant women, and worksheets for participants to enter personalized information in response to the lesson content. eMB is individually guided without facilitation, b) clients control the pace by which they review online content, c) and clients can review online content as many times as they like. Participants who receive eMB will also complete assessments at baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention.
Home Visiting Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONCore content of home visiting program services typically address: (a) preparation for childbirth and having a young child in the home, (b) provision of emotional and tangible \[e.g., diapers, formula\] support, (c) discussion of infant and young child development, (d) linkages to prenatal and pediatric care, and (e) referrals to community resources for social and health services. Those receiving usual care home visiting will not receive any eMB or MB course content. Once study participation is completed, the home visitor may introduce eMB to the participant if they are interested. Participants in the control group will also complete assessments at baseline, 1 week post-intervention (i.e., following 8 weeks of usual home visiting services), and 3 months post-intervention (i.e.g, following 8 weeks of usual home visiting services).
Interventions
This study's intervention is called Mothers and Babies Online or "eMB", which consists of 8 sessions that correspond with key cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) elements: pleasant activities, thoughts, and social support/contact with others. Integrated throughout eMB are activities and skills based on attachment theory that emphasize how each CBT module relates to promoting a strong, nurturing connection between parent and child. eMB includes informational pages, short audio/video clips, images of infants and pregnant women, and worksheets for participants to enter personalized information in response to the lesson content. eMB is individually guided without facilitation, b) clients control the pace by which they review online content, c) and clients can review online content as many times as they like. Participants who receive eMB will also complete assessments at baseline, 1 week post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Are enrolled in home visiting services
- Are 16 years or older
- Are English Proficient (reading, speaking, and writing)
- Are currently pregnant or have a young child up to 6 months
- Have internet access
- Have access to an electronic device (cell phone, laptop, tablet, etc.)
- Are at risk for developing perinatal depression as defined by one or more of the following: a score of 5-14 on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), a score of \>3.5 on the Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory (PDPI), personal history of depression, and/or familial history of depression.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Northwestern Universitylead
- Palo Alto Universitycollaborator
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
Study Sites (6)
Metropolitan Family Services
Chicago, Illinois, 60606, United States
Easter Seals
Joliet, Illinois, 60435, United States
South Central Iowa Community Action Program
Chariton, Iowa, 50049, United States
Children & Family Resource Center
Hendersonville, North Carolina, 28792, United States
Carolina Health Centers
Greenwood, South Carolina, 29646, United States
Newport News
Newport News, Virginia, 23607, United States
Related Publications (37)
Evans J, Heron J, Francomb H, Oke S, Golding J. Cohort study of depressed mood during pregnancy and after childbirth. BMJ. 2001 Aug 4;323(7307):257-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7307.257.
PMID: 11485953BACKGROUNDGaynes BN, Gavin N, Meltzer-Brody S, Lohr KN, Swinson T, Gartlehner G, Brody S, Miller WC. Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2005 Feb;(119):1-8. doi: 10.1037/e439372005-001. No abstract available.
PMID: 15760246BACKGROUNDMoses-Kolko EL, Roth EK. Antepartum and postpartum depression: healthy mom, healthy baby. J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2004 Summer;59(3):181-91.
PMID: 15354371BACKGROUNDSegre LS, O'Hara MW, Arndt S, Stuart S. The prevalence of postpartum depression: the relative significance of three social status indices. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 Apr;42(4):316-21. doi: 10.1007/s00127-007-0168-1. Epub 2007 Feb 13.
PMID: 17370048BACKGROUNDRobertson E, Grace S, Wallington T, Stewart DE. Antenatal risk factors for postpartum depression: a synthesis of recent literature. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004 Jul-Aug;26(4):289-95. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2004.02.006.
PMID: 15234824BACKGROUNDBeebe B, Jaffe J, Buck K, Chen H, Cohen P, Blatt S, Kaminer T, Feldstein S, Andrews H. Six-week postpartum maternal self-criticism and dependency and 4-month mother-infant self- and interactive contingencies. Dev Psychol. 2007 Nov;43(6):1360-76. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1360.
PMID: 18020817BACKGROUNDMurray L, Cooper PJ, Wilson A, Romaniuk H. Controlled trial of the short- and long-term effect of psychological treatment of post-partum depression: 2. Impact on the mother-child relationship and child outcome. Br J Psychiatry. 2003 May;182:420-7.
PMID: 12724245BACKGROUNDNational Research Council (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Prevention of Mental Disorders and Substance Abuse Among Children, Youth, and Young Adults: Research Advances and Promising Interventions; O'Connell ME, Boat T, Warner KE, editors. Preventing Mental, Emotional, and Behavioral Disorders Among Young People: Progress and Possibilities. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2009. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK32775/
PMID: 20662125BACKGROUNDAmerican Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5. ManMag; 2003.
BACKGROUNDHowell EA, Mora PA, Horowitz CR, Leventhal H. Racial and ethnic differences in factors associated with early postpartum depressive symptoms. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jun;105(6):1442-50. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000164050.34126.37.
PMID: 15932842BACKGROUNDMora PA, Bennett IM, Elo IT, Mathew L, Coyne JC, Culhane JF. Distinct trajectories of perinatal depressive symptomatology: evidence from growth mixture modeling. Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Jan 1;169(1):24-32. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn283. Epub 2008 Nov 10.
PMID: 19001135BACKGROUNDBennett HA, Einarson A, Taddio A, Koren G, Einarson TR. Prevalence of depression during pregnancy: systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Apr;103(4):698-709. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000116689.75396.5f.
PMID: 15051562BACKGROUNDDolbier CL, Rush TE, Sahadeo LS, Shaffer ML, Thorp J; Community Child Health Network Investigators. Relationships of race and socioeconomic status to postpartum depressive symptoms in rural African American and non-Hispanic white women. Matern Child Health J. 2013 Sep;17(7):1277-87. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1123-7.
PMID: 22961387BACKGROUNDHolzman C, Eyster J, Tiedje LB, Roman LA, Seagull E, Rahbar MH. A life course perspective on depressive symptoms in mid-pregnancy. Matern Child Health J. 2006 Mar;10(2):127-38. doi: 10.1007/s10995-005-0044-0. Epub 2006 Jan 7.
PMID: 16400535BACKGROUNDSchmit S, Schott L, Pavetti L, Matthews H. Effective, Evidence-Based Home Visiting Programs in Every State at Risk if Congress Does Not Extend Funding. 2015;http://www.cbpp.org/research/effective-evidence-based-home-visiting-programs-in-every-state-at-risk-if-congress-does-not. Accessed February 10, 2016.
BACKGROUNDAvellar S, Paulsell D, Sama-Miller E, Grosso PD, Akers L, Kleinman R. Home visiting evidence of effectiveness review: Executive summary. Mathematica Policy Research;2013.
BACKGROUNDU.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning and Evaluation. Depression in the Lives of Early Head Start Families: Research to Practice Brief. 2006; http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/resource/depression-in-the-lives-of-early-head-start-families-research-to-practice. Accessed January 15, 2014. Accessed January 15, 2016.
BACKGROUNDU.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau. A Comprehensive Approach for Community-Based Programs to Address Intimate Partner Violence and Perinatal Depression. 2013; http://mchb.hrsa.gov/pregnancyandbeyond/depression/partnerviolence/partnerviolenceandperinataldepression.pdf.Accessed February 10 2016.
BACKGROUNDPrevent Child Abuse America. Healthy Families America Critical Elements. 2001; http://www.healthyfamiliesamerica.org/downloads/critical_elements_rationale.pdf. Accessed January 15, 2016.
BACKGROUNDAmmerman RT, Putnam FW, Bosse NR, Teeters AR, Van Ginkel JB. Maternal Depression in Home Visitation: A Systematic Review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2010 May;15(3):191-200. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2009.12.002.
PMID: 20401324BACKGROUNDAmmerman RT, Putnam FW, Altaye M, Chen L, Holleb LJ, Stevens J, Short JA, Van Ginkel JB. Changes in depressive symptoms in first time mothers in home visitation. Child Abuse Negl. 2009 Mar;33(3):127-38. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.09.005. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
PMID: 19328548BACKGROUNDChazan-Cohen R, Ayoub C, Pan BA, Roggman L, Raikes H, Mckelvey L, Whiteside-Mansell L, Hart A. It takes time: Impacts of Early Head Start that lead to reductions in maternal depression two years later. Infant Ment Health J. 2007 Mar;28(2):151-170. doi: 10.1002/imhj.20127.
PMID: 28640556BACKGROUNDTandon SD, Parillo KM, Jenkins C, Duggan AK. Formative evaluation of home visitors' role in addressing poor mental health, domestic violence, and substance abuse among low-income pregnant and parenting women. Matern Child Health J. 2005 Sep;9(3):273-83. doi: 10.1007/s10995-005-0012-8.
PMID: 16240078BACKGROUNDMcFarlane E, Burrell L, Duggan A, Tandon D. Outcomes of a Randomized Trial of a Cognitive Behavioral Enhancement to Address Maternal Distress in Home Visited Mothers. Matern Child Health J. 2017 Mar;21(3):475-484. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2125-7.
PMID: 27535131BACKGROUNDTandon SD, Leis JA, Mendelson T, Perry DF, Kemp K. Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to prevent perinatal depression in low-income home visiting clients. Matern Child Health J. 2014 May;18(4):873-81. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1313-y.
PMID: 23793487BACKGROUNDTandon SD, Ward EA, Hamil JL, Jimenez C, Carter M. Perinatal depression prevention through home visitation: a cluster randomized trial of mothers and babies 1-on-1. J Behav Med. 2018 Oct;41(5):641-652. doi: 10.1007/s10865-018-9934-7. Epub 2018 May 15.
PMID: 29766470BACKGROUNDUS Preventive Services Task Force; Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, Barry MJ, Caughey AB, Davidson KW, Doubeni CA, Epling JW Jr, Grossman DC, Kemper AR, Kubik M, Landefeld CS, Mangione CM, Silverstein M, Simon MA, Tseng CW, Wong JB. Interventions to Prevent Perinatal Depression: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2019 Feb 12;321(6):580-587. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0007.
PMID: 30747971BACKGROUNDMcCurdie T, Taneva S, Casselman M, Yeung M, McDaniel C, Ho W, Cafazzo J. mHealth consumer apps: the case for user-centered design. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2012 Fall;Suppl:49-56. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-46.s2.49. No abstract available.
PMID: 23039777BACKGROUNDLyon AR, Koerner K. User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation. Clin Psychol (New York). 2016 Jun;23(2):180-200. doi: 10.1111/cpsp.12154. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
PMID: 29456295BACKGROUNDVirzi, R.A., J.F. Sorce, and L.B. Herbert. A comparison of three usability evaluation methods: Heuristic, think-aloud, and performance testing. in Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 1993. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
BACKGROUNDBradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1758-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x.
PMID: 17286625BACKGROUNDFusch, P.I. and L.R. Ness, Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. Qualitative Report, 2015. 20(9): p. 1408-1416.
BACKGROUNDGuest, G., A. Bunce, and L. Johnson, How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 2006. 18(1): p. 59-82.
BACKGROUNDFaulkner L. Beyond the five-user assumption: benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003 Aug;35(3):379-83. doi: 10.3758/bf03195514.
PMID: 14587545BACKGROUNDDeSantis L, Ugarriza DN. The concept of theme as used in qualitative nursing research. West J Nurs Res. 2000 Apr;22(3):351-72. doi: 10.1177/019394590002200308.
PMID: 10804897BACKGROUNDHill, C.E., et al., Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of counseling psychology, 2005. 52(2): p. 196.
BACKGROUNDHill, C.E., B.J. Thompson, and E.N. Williams, A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 1997. 25(4): p. 517-572.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Darius Tandon, PhD
Northwestern University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director, Institute for Public Health and Medicine (IPHAM) - Center for Community Health; Associate Professor of Medical Social Sciences
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2023
First Posted
February 6, 2023
Study Start
March 1, 2023
Primary Completion
October 1, 2024
Study Completion
October 1, 2024
Last Updated
December 13, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12