Evaluation of the "Blue Halo Coil Catheter" for Patients With Prostatic Obstruction
BlueHaloCoil
Study: A Prospective Evaluation of the Blue Halo BioMedical, LLC "Blue Halo Coil Catheter" for Patients With Prostatic Obstruction
1 other identifier
interventional
95
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The Investigators will study a device for men in urinary retention secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, BPH ,who are catheter dependent or who have a Post Void Residual \> 350cc. The hypothesis is that the device will allow these participants to return to volitional voiding with a Post Void Residual \<75 cc.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2024
CompletedJanuary 10, 2024
January 1, 2024
2.1 years
September 20, 2022
January 8, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The change in Post Void Residual from baseline to day 28 will be measured and reported
The primary effectiveness endpoint of the study is the number of subjects who were able to return to volitional voiding with a post void residual less then 75 cc during a 28-day study period.Post Void Residual will be measured by bladder ultrasound and reported as cc.
28 days
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Primary safety endpoint adverse event and device removal
28 days
Secondary Safety Endpoint 1, incidence of device encrustation at removal
28 days
Secondary Safety Endpoint 2,urinary obstruction due to device migration
28 days
Secondary Safety Endpoint 3, incidence of clinically significant hematuria
28 days
Other Outcomes (4)
Bacterial Infection Monitoring
56 days
Trends in Renal Function
56 days
Quality of Life Measurement, no scale to report
28 days
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Blue Halo Coil Catheter for Urinary Retention
EXPERIMENTALThe indication for use of the Blue Halo Coil Catheter is to facilitate bladder drainage in adult male patients with urinary retention due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. The device is inserted for temporary use up to 28 days.
Interventions
device inserted with coil at the bladder and straight arm in the prostatic urethra proximal to the external sphincter
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male subjects \> 50 years of age
- Able to provide consent
- Participants in urinary retention with post void residual \> 350 cc
- Urinary retention is due to BPH with a prostate volume \> 50cc or a prostatic urethral length of 5+ cm
- Subjects with a PSA \> 4 ng/ml and a PSA density of 0.1 or less
- Subjects on alpha- blocking drugs or 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor drugs may be included
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to undergo bladder catheterization ( i.e. urethral stricture)
- Presence of gross hematuria
- Lack of cognitive ability to give consent or keep appointments
- History of Prostate Cancer
- Subject with a PSA \> 4 ng/ml and a PSA density of \> 0.1 will require prostate biopsy to rule out prostate cancer in order to be considered for study enrollment
- A subject with a prostate nodule will require biopsy to exclude cancer diagnosis
- Subject with a PSA \> 10 ng/ml
- Subject taking LHRH analogs or anti-androgen drugs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
The University of Alabama-Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35205, United States
Mayo Clinic Arizona
Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, United States
Florida Urology Partners
Brandon, Florida, 33511, United States
Vero Urology Center
Vero Beach, Florida, 32960, United States
Related Publications (11)
Fontanarosa PB, Roush WR. Acute urinary retention. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1988 Aug;6(3):419-37.
PMID: 3292220RESULTSamm BJ, Dmochowski RR. Urologic emergencies. Conditions affecting the kidney, ureter, bladder, prostate, and urethra. Postgrad Med. 1996 Oct;100(4):177-80, 183-4. doi: 10.3810/pgm.1996.10.100.
PMID: 8858090RESULTAndersen JT, Nickel JC, Marshall VR, Schulman CC, Boyle P. Finasteride significantly reduces acute urinary retention and need for surgery in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology. 1997 Jun;49(6):839-45. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00185-4.
PMID: 9187688RESULTde la Rosette JJ, Beerlage HP, Debruyne FM. Role of temporary stents in alternative treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol. 1997 Dec;11(6):467-72. doi: 10.1089/end.1997.11.467.
PMID: 9440858RESULTWilliams G. Stents in the lower urinary tract. European Urology Update Series 1992. Vol l (1), p 82-87.
RESULTDevonec M, Dahlstrand C. Temporary urethral stenting after high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy of the prostate. World J Urol. 1998;16(2):120-3. doi: 10.1007/s003450050037.
PMID: 12073225RESULTFeneley RC, Hopley IB, Wells PN. Urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda. J Med Eng Technol. 2015;39(8):459-70. doi: 10.3109/03091902.2015.1085600. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
PMID: 26383168RESULTHammond, G. A Prospective Evaluation of the Catheter Science M3 "Mini Catheter" for Patients with Prostatic Obstruction. AUA Poster Presentation MP73-06, San Francisco, California, May, 2018
RESULTSabharwal S, Sabharwal S. Using Temporary Prostatic Stents to Eliminate Bacterial Colonization in Men with Chronic Indwelling Catheters: A Pilot Study. Cureus. 2018 Aug 16;10(8):e3152. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3152.
PMID: 30410822RESULTGarcia MM, Gulati S, Liepmann D, Stackhouse GB, Greene K, Stoller ML. Traditional Foley drainage systems--do they drain the bladder? J Urol. 2007 Jan;177(1):203-7; discussion 207. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.101.
PMID: 17162043RESULTShore ND, Dineen MK, Saslawsky MJ, Lumerman JH, Corica AP. A temporary intraurethral prostatic stent relieves prostatic obstruction following transurethral microwave thermotherapy. J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):1040-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.059.
PMID: 17296408RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2022
First Posted
February 6, 2023
Study Start
August 1, 2022
Primary Completion
September 1, 2024
Study Completion
October 1, 2024
Last Updated
January 10, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- CSR
- Time Frame
- within 5 days of event and for duration of the study
- Access Criteria
- all investigators will be emailed by the sponsor with the Adverse Event shared information
any Adverse Event (AE), Unanticipated AE will be shared with other researchers