Use of Fractional CO2 Laser Versus Erbium:YAG Laser for the Treatment of GSM in Patients Using Aromatase Inhibitors
LASI
1 other identifier
interventional
162
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To study the efficacy and safety of intravaginal CO2 laser versus intravaginal Er:YAG laser and sham application in alleviating genitourinary symptoms in patients receiving an aromatase inhibitor as adjuvant treatment of breast cancer
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 27, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 9, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedJuly 1, 2024
June 1, 2024
1.9 years
January 9, 2023
June 28, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
change in severity dryness as most bothersome symptom (MBS) of GSM at 3 months after the end of treatment
scored on a 10 cm VAS
at 3 months after the end of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Patient reported effect of laser on other GSM symptoms
at 3 months after the end of treatment
Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
at 3 months after the end of treatment
Urinary Distress Index (UDI-6)
at 3 months after the end of treatment
The degree of discomfort of the treatment procedure by the participant
at the end of the each treatment-visit
The longevity of the effect
at 24 months after the end of treatment
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Mona Lisa Touch CO2 laser
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1. Power: 30 W. 2. Dwell time: 1000 μs. 3. Spacing: 1000 μm. 4. Depth: SmartStack parameter from 1 to 3 depending on the treatment status. 5. D-pulse mode. 6. At the introitus the power will be reduced to 24 W
Fotona Smooth erbium:YAG laser
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1. Phase I (vaginal) Renovalase™ mode with (a) fluence of 5,5J/cm2, (b) SMOOTHTM mode frequency 1.6 Hz, and (c) spot size 7 mm. 2. Phase II (vestibulum and introitus) Renovalase™ mode with (a) fluence 10 J/cm2, (b) SMOOTHTM mode frequency 1.6Hz, and (c) spot size 7 mm.
sham treatment
SHAM COMPARATOR1. The blocking device is inserted over the laser outlet before attaching the application speculum. With this device the laser beam is blocked entirely. 2. Phase I (vaginal) Renovalase™ mode with (a) fluence of 5,5J/cm2, (b) SMOOTHTM mode frequency 1.6 Hz, and (c) spot size 7 mm. 3. Phase II (vestibulum and introitus) Renovalase™ mode with (a) fluence 1,5 J/cm2, (b) SMOOTHTM mode frequency 1.6Hz, and (c) spot size 7 mm.
Interventions
application of intravaginal laser
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Recruited participants will meet all of these criteria:
- a history of breast cancer
- premenopausal at diagnosis of breast cancer
- using AI as an adjuvant treatment
- moderate to severe symptoms of GSM (VAS ≥ 4/10)
- currently menopausal, which can be either biochemical menopause as confirmed after chemotherapy, surgical or medicinally induced (GnRH analogues for the duration of the trial)
You may not qualify if:
- Not willing to abstain from vaginal intercourse for 1 week following laser therapy
- Acute urinary or genital tract infections
- A history of genital fistula, a thin rectovaginal septum as determined by the investigator, or history of fourth degree laceration
- Prolapse ≥ grade 2 according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System
- Previous vaginal mesh implantation
- Abnormal result in the last cervical smear (maximum 36 month before enrollment)
- Vaginal stenosis that does not allow the placement of the laser probe
- Any condition that could interfere with study compliance
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UZ Leuven
Leuven, Flemish Brabant, 3000, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susanne Housmans, MD
UZ Leuven
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- participant and outcome assessor are blinded
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2023
First Posted
February 6, 2023
Study Start
December 27, 2022
Primary Completion
December 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 1, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share