NCT05713084

Brief Summary

This study hypotheses that using low medial cut osteotomy BSSO in mandibular setback can be an efficient and effective method to limit the bony segment interferences , decreasing muscles stripping during osteotomy ,decrease condylar torque and so securing preoperative condylar position during BSSO in comparison with using high medial cut BSSO.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 28, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 21, 2023

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 6, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

February 6, 2023

Status Verified

February 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

January 21, 2023

Last Update Submit

February 2, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

mandibular setbacklow medial cutcondylar position

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • 3D mandibular condylar position changes

    assessment of condylar position changes in millimetre using C.T.(axial ,coronal and sagital cut. ). 1. Axial condylar head long-axis angle (AHA): angle between the sagittal plane and the axial condylar head axis line 2. Axial condylar head position (AHP): perpendicular distance between the sagittal plane and the most medial point of the condylar head 3. Frontal condylar head long-axis angle (FHA): angle between the axial plane and the frontal condylar head long-axis line 4. Frontal condylar head position (FHP): perpendicular distance between the axial plane and most superior point of the condylar head 5. Sagittal condylar head long-axis angle (SHA): angle between the coronal plane and the sagittal condylar head long-axis line 6. Sagital condylar head position (SHP): perpendicular distance between the coronal plane and the most superior point of the condylar head

    Preoperative- 1-month postoperative - 6 months post operative

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Assessment of changes in articular disc position

    Preoperative , 6month postoperative

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Clinical assessment of maximum incisal opening (MIO)

    Preoperative - 1 months postoperative - 6 months postoperative

  • pain on TMJ

    Preoperative - 1 months postoperative - 6 months postoperative

  • sounds on TMJ

    Preoperative - 1 months postoperative - 6 months postoperative

Study Arms (2)

mandibular setback using low medial cut ostetomy

EXPERIMENTAL

mandibular setback using low medial cut ostetomy by keeping the cut ''low'' or close to the mandibular occlusal plane and ''short'' or terminating anterior to the lingula.

Other: mandibular setback using BSSRO

mandibular setback using high medial cut ostetomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

mandibular setback by placement of the medial ramus osteotomy cut 'high', just a few millimeters above the lingula, superior and lateral to the entrance point of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) into the mandibular foramen ,

Other: mandibular setback using BSSRO

Interventions

mandibular setback using BSSRO

mandibular setback using high medial cut ostetomymandibular setback using low medial cut ostetomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age of the patient between (18-60) years
  • Patients in need of mandibular setback using bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
  • All patients are free from any systemic disease that may affect normal bone healing.
  • Patient with facial deformity will be treated with mandibular setback either mono or bimaxilary surgeries
  • Patient with facial deformity will be treated with mandibular setback either surgery first approach or orthofirst approach.
  • Sufficient dentition to reproduce the occlusal relationships
  • Patient's consent to participate

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with any systemic disease that may affect normal healing
  • Intra-bony lesions or infections that may interfere with surgery.
  • Previous orthognathic surgeries.
  • Patients with all types of facial clefts

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University

Cairo, 11553, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Maxillofacial AbnormalitiesMalocclusion, Angle Class III

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Craniofacial AbnormalitiesMusculoskeletal AbnormalitiesMusculoskeletal DiseasesStomatognathic System AbnormalitiesStomatognathic DiseasesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesMalocclusionTooth Diseases

Study Officials

  • Fahmy Mobarak, professor

    Cairo University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2023

First Posted

February 6, 2023

Study Start

September 28, 2022

Primary Completion

April 1, 2023

Study Completion

September 1, 2023

Last Updated

February 6, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-02

Locations