Precision Breast Conserving Surgery With Guidance.
1 other identifier
interventional
92
1 country
1
Brief Summary
From 2021 to 2022, 31 patients with unifocal breast cancer were enrolled for precision breast conserving surgery (PBCS) guided by wire guided localization (WGL) combined with CT guided 3D reconstruction. Surrounded WGL was performed under local anesthesia, followed by an immediate contrast enhanced CT scan. PBCS guided by CT guided 3D reconstruction was performed one day after the localization. Women who underwent palpation guided breast conserving surgery (BCS) were included as control. Two-sided Student t test, Fisher's exact test and chi-square test was applied.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Aug 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable breast-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 9, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 1, 2023
CompletedFebruary 1, 2023
January 1, 2023
11 months
January 9, 2023
January 29, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The sum of located margin resection widths
The sum of the resection widths of located superior, inferior, lateral and interior margins
1 month post operation
Secondary Outcomes (4)
The specimen diameter
1 month post operation
the largest margin resection width
1 month post operation
Operation time
intraoperative
Patients reported outcomes
participants completed the scale at baseline (before surgery), 1 month post operation and 6 months post radiotherapy (RT)
Study Arms (2)
PBCS
EXPERIMENTALpatients enrolled in the PBCS group underwent precision breast conserving surgery guided by wire guided localization combined with MDCT guided 3D reconstruction.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONpatients enrolled in the Control group underwent palpation guided breast conserving surgery
Interventions
Local anesthesia was induced by using 1% lidocaine before wire location. The wire (localization set, PAJUNK) was placed in the superior, inferior, lateral and interior edge of the tumor through a 20-gauge needle using US guidance one day before BCS, respectively. Then, the patient underwent an immediate supine contrast enhanced CT (Philips Brilliance iCT) scan of the breast. The radiologist performed 3D reconstruction of CT images prior to surgery. Finally, the surgical procedures were performed by experienced breast surgeons combing 3D reconstruction of CT images and wire localizations one day after the localization.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- women with T1/T2 invasive breast cancer confirmed by core biopsy
- be suitable for BCS
- the tumor should be unilateral and unifocal which is clearly visible with US
You may not qualify if:
- patients with an extensive intraductal component in invasive cancer
- patients who were pregnant or breast-feeding
- patients receiving neoadjuvant therapies.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China
Related Publications (12)
Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH, Wolmark N. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1233-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022152.
PMID: 12393820BACKGROUNDWrubel E, Natwick R, Wright GP. Breast-Conserving Therapy is Associated with Improved Survival Compared with Mastectomy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Propensity Score Matched Comparison Using the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;28(2):914-919. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08829-4. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
PMID: 32661849BACKGROUNDKim H, Lee SB, Nam SJ, Lee ES, Park BW, Park HY, Lee HJ, Kim J, Chung Y, Kim HJ, Ko BS, Lee JW, Son BH, Ahn SH. Survival of Breast-Conserving Surgery Plus Radiotherapy versus Total Mastectomy in Early Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;28(9):5039-5047. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09591-x. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
PMID: 33492542BACKGROUNDLi P, Li L, Xiu B, Zhang L, Yang B, Chi Y, Xue J, Wu J. The Prognoses of Young Women With Breast Cancer (</=35 years) With Different Surgical Options: A Propensity Score Matching Retrospective Cohort Study. Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 28;12:795023. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.795023. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35296009BACKGROUNDHanson SE, Lei X, Roubaud MS, DeSnyder SM, Caudle AS, Shaitelman SF, Hoffman KE, Smith GL, Jagsi R, Peterson SK, Smith BD. Long-term Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer After Breast Conservation vs Mastectomy and Reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2022 Jun 1;157(6):e220631. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0631. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
PMID: 35416926BACKGROUNDMoran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, Klimberg S, Chavez-MacGregor M, Freedman G, Houssami N, Johnson PL, Morrow M; Society of Surgical Oncology; American Society for Radiation Oncology. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 10;32(14):1507-15. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.3935. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
PMID: 24516019BACKGROUNDLeiloglou M, Kedrzycki MS, Elson DS, Leff DR. ASO Author Reflections: Towards Fluorescence Guided Tumor Identification for Precision Breast Conserving Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(Suppl 3):564-565. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10626-6. Epub 2021 Aug 18. No abstract available.
PMID: 34406539BACKGROUNDHill-Kayser CE, Vachani C, Hampshire MK, Di Lullo GA, Metz JM. Cosmetic outcomes and complications reported by patients having undergone breast-conserving treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jul 1;83(3):839-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.08.013. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
PMID: 22137022BACKGROUNDAhmed M, Rubio IT, Klaase JM, Douek M. Surgical treatment of nonpalpable primary invasive and in situ breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov;12(11):645-63. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.161. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
PMID: 26416152BACKGROUNDO'Connell AM, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Kawakyu-O'Connor DT. Newer Technologies in Breast Cancer Imaging: Dedicated Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018 Feb;39(1):106-113. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
PMID: 29317032BACKGROUNDHe Z, Chen Z, Tan M, Elingarami S, Liu Y, Li T, Deng Y, He N, Li S, Fu J, Li W. A review on methods for diagnosis of breast cancer cells and tissues. Cell Prolif. 2020 Jul;53(7):e12822. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12822. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
PMID: 32530560BACKGROUNDDoihara H, Fujita T, Takabatake D, Takahashi H, Ogasawara Y, Shimizu N. Clinical significance of multidetector-row computed tomography in breast surgery. Breast J. 2006 Sep-Oct;12(5 Suppl 2):S204-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00323.x.
PMID: 16959003BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hui Xie, Doctor
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2023
First Posted
February 1, 2023
Study Start
August 1, 2021
Primary Completion
June 30, 2022
Study Completion
January 1, 2023
Last Updated
February 1, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01