NCT05701735

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the utility and effectiveness of a decision aid in cisplatin-intolerant patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. 1.What is the effectiveness of the decision aid in reducing decisional conflict?
  2. 2.What is the utility of the decision aid in preparing for decision-making?

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
45

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 27, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 27, 2023

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 20, 2023

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

February 23, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

December 27, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 22, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Patient decision aidCervical cancerChemotherapyRadiotherapyElderlyRenal failureDecisional conflict

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Decisional conflict

    Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) scores of ≥25 will indicate significant decisional conflict. The proportion of participants having pretest (baseline) and posttest decisional conflict scores of ≥25 for each group will be reported.

    Prior to the second consultation visit (for treatment decision and implementation planning), usually within one week

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Utility in preparation for decision-making

    After use of the patient decision aid and prior to the second consultation visit (for treatment decision and implementation planning), usually within one week

Study Arms (2)

Routine care

NO INTERVENTION

Routine in-house workflow for initial and follow-up consultation, disclosure of diagnosis, and apprisal and counseling regarding treatment options

Patient decision aid

EXPERIMENTAL

Routine in-house workflow for initial and follow-up consultation, disclosure of diagnosis, and apprisal and counseling regarding treatment options plus provision of a decision aid after the initial consultation

Behavioral: CECIL Patient Decision Aid

Interventions

The CECIL patient decision aid explicitly identifies the disease, the index decision, and the treatment options, describes the positive and negative features and consequences of each option, and guides the patient in examining personal values and preferences, to arrive at a quality and realistic decision. The decision aid will be developed and validated according to the guidelines and standards published by the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration.

Also known as: Decision Support Intervention
Patient decision aid

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Squamous, adeno- or adenosquamous histology
  • International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage I-B3, II-A2, II-B to IV-A
  • Contraindication to ChT, including but not limited to hydronephrosis, renal or cardiac dysfunction, frailty, or refusal
  • Grade 6 level English literacy
  • Informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Other histologies
  • Metastatic disease
  • Other active cancers
  • Prior cancer EXCEPT for a cancer treated curatively, in remission for ≥5 years, with low recurrence risk; adequately treated lentigo maligna or non-melanoma skin cancer without evidence of disease; or adequately treated carcinoma-in-situ without evidence of disease
  • Prior pelvic radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or chemotherapy
  • Pregnancy
  • Cognitive impairment or psychological disturbance limiting study compliance

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital

Manila, National Capital Region, 1016, Philippines

RECRUITING

Manila Doctors Hospital

Manila, NCR, 1000, Philippines

RECRUITING

University of Santo Tomas Hospital

Manila, NCR, 1008, Philippines

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Bacorro W, Baldivia K, Mariano J, Dancel E, Antonio L, Gonzalez G, Ortin TS, Canlas R. Patient Decision Aid for Chemotherapy or Exclusion in Cisplatin-Intolerant Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Development, Alpha Testing, and Peer Validation. JCO Glob Oncol. 2023 Sep;9:e2300096. doi: 10.1200/GO.23.00096.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsRenal Insufficiency

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Uterine NeoplasmsGenital Neoplasms, FemaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsUterine Cervical DiseasesUterine DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital DiseasesKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Warren Bacorro, MD

    University of Santo Tomas Hospital - Benavides Cancer Institute

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Given the nature of the intervention, true blinding could not be done on the participant, who is also the assessor. Blinding is necessary to control for participant expectation bias and participant performance bias. The provider (gynecologic oncologist) of the standard of care (standard consultation) is blinded to the subsequent assignment to either arm.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: Phase 1: Embedded mixed-methods design Phase 2: Experimental, block-randomized two-arm trial design
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2022

First Posted

January 27, 2023

Study Start

February 20, 2023

Primary Completion

September 1, 2024

Study Completion

December 1, 2024

Last Updated

February 23, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All data generated in this study will remain confidential and will be stored securely at the University of Santo Tomas Hospital - Benavides Cancer Institute and will be made available upon request and upon approval of the study team.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
Five years after study completion
Access Criteria
Data will only be made available to people directly involved with the study or requesting and approved parties who have signed a Confidentiality Agreement.

Locations