Development of a Screening Tool for Difficult Embryo Transfers
1 other identifier
observational
200
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study aims to investigate the accuracy of a proposed screening tool in identifying difficult embryo transfers (ETs) without doing a mock ET.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Mar 2023
Shorter than P25 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 6, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2023
CompletedFebruary 3, 2025
January 1, 2025
10 months
January 17, 2023
January 31, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Prevalence of difficult ET
Approximately 4 months
Percentage of screening questionnaires suggesting a difficult ET
Approximately 4 months
Accuracy of the screening tool to predict difficult ET
Approximately 4 months
Study Arms (1)
All participants
Interventions
The screening questionnaire will be filled by the Physician doing the OPU. The screening questionnaire will be informed by the participant's history. Cervix will be visualized during routine vaginal cleansing for OPU, and its appearance (size, and deviation) will be recorded in the screening questionnaire after the OPU procedure. Finally, a screenshot of the ultrasound used for OPU, showing the cervix and cervical canal in the sagittal plane will be taken during routine procedure and saved in electronic chart.
When the participants comes back for ET during her routine treatment, ET will be done in exactly the same way in routine treatment. Participant will not undergo any additional manipulation, intervention, nor the procedure will take longer. The Embryologist assisting the procedure will record the duration of the procedure, from the moment the Physician takes the outer ET catheter to his/her hand until he/she passes the cervix and calls for the inner catheter loaded with the embryo. Up on completion of the ET procedure as routine practice, the Physician will fill a questionnaire about the procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
All women undergoing an ET in ART Fertility Clinics Abu Dhabi and Dubai.
You may qualify if:
- All women undergoing an ET is eligible.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
ART Fertility Clinics LLC
Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi Emirate, 60202, United Arab Emirates
ART Fertility Clinics LLC
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Related Publications (7)
Cirillo F, Patrizio P, Baccini M, Morenghi E, Ronchetti C, Cafaro L, Zannoni E, Baggiani A, Levi-Setti PE. The human factor: does the operator performing the embryo transfer significantly impact the cycle outcome? Hum Reprod. 2020 Feb 29;35(2):275-282. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez290.
PMID: 32100020BACKGROUNDDessolle L, Freour T, Barriere P, Jean M, Ravel C, Darai E, Biau DJ. How soon can I be proficient in embryo transfer? Lessons from the cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM). Hum Reprod. 2010 Feb;25(2):380-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep391. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
PMID: 19923166BACKGROUNDLopez MJ, Garcia D, Rodriguez A, Colodron M, Vassena R, Vernaeve V. Individualized embryo transfer training: timing and performance. Hum Reprod. 2014 Jul;29(7):1432-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu080. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
PMID: 24781427BACKGROUNDNoyes N, Licciardi F, Grifo J, Krey L, Berkeley A. In vitro fertilization outcome relative to embryo transfer difficulty: a novel approach to the forbidding cervix. Fertil Steril. 1999 Aug;72(2):261-5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00235-6.
PMID: 10438992BACKGROUNDKably Ambe A, Campos Canas JA, Aguirre Ramos G, Carballo Mondragon E, Carrera Lomas E, Ortiz Reyes H, Kisel Laska R. [Evaluation of two transfer embryo systems performed by six physicians]. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2011 Apr;79(4):196-9. Spanish.
PMID: 21966806BACKGROUNDWood MA, Kerrigan KL, Burns MK, Glenn TL, Ludwin A, Christianson MS, Bhagavath B, Lindheim SR. Overcoming the Challenging Cervix: Identification and Techniques to Access the Uterine Cavity. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2018 Nov;73(11):641-649. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000614.
PMID: 30468239BACKGROUNDAta B, Lawrenz B, Melado L, Del Gallego R, Coughlan C, Ruiz F, Marqueta Marques L, El-Damen A, Elkhatib I, Fatemi HM. The ART-ET screening tool: an easy-to-use non-invasive screening method to predict difficult embryo transfers in advance. Hum Reprod. 2025 Apr 1;40(4):647-653. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf002.
PMID: 39938557DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Barbara Lawrenz, PhD
ART Fertility Clinics LLC
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2023
First Posted
January 27, 2023
Study Start
March 6, 2023
Primary Completion
December 30, 2023
Study Completion
December 30, 2023
Last Updated
February 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01