NCT05700383

Brief Summary

The investigators aim to conduct a randomized controlled trial to test the feasibility of a mind-body walking program compared to a health education program for individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The investigators will assess the feasibility of recruitment procedures (enrollment, recruitment of racial and ethnic minorities) and intervention delivery (fidelity, adherence, credibility, satisfaction, optimization), following pre-specified benchmarks. Both programs will be delivered in-person.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
92

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 17, 2023

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 26, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2023

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2024

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 16, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

January 28, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

January 17, 2023

Results QC Date

March 20, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 9, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Chronic PainPhysical FunctionMindfulness

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • Recruitment Feasibility (Ability)

    Ability to enroll 80% or more of the sedentary chronic pain patients who meet study criteria.

    1 Year

  • Recruitment Feasibility (Timeliness) - Number of Participants Recruited in 1 Year

    Timeliness of enrollment; we will recruit a sample of 90 patients across the 3 sites over the course of 1 year. Participants will be considered enrolled upon randomization. Assessed by the number of participants enrolled in the study over the course of 1 year. If number enrolled meets or exceeds goal of 90 participants, the benchmark is considered met.

    1 Year

  • Feasibility of Recruitment Racial and Ethnic Minorities

    38% or more of the entire sample will be comprised of racial and ethnic minorities, which is consistent with the current USA demographic distribution.

    1 Year

  • Intervention Feasibility/ Adherence to Sessions

    ≥80 chronic pain patients attend ≥7/10 sessions for each program (70%)

    Post-Test (10 Weeks)

  • Credibility and Expectancy Scale - Credibility

    ≥80 chronic pain patients with credibility scores higher than the Credibility and Expectancy Scale credibility subscale's mid-point, indicating intervention credibility. Credibility subscale scores range from 3 to 27. Higher scores indicate higher perceived credibility for the program.

    Baseline (0 Weeks)

  • Client Satisfaction Scale

    ≥80 chronic pain patients with satisfaction scores higher than the scale's mid-point, indicating intervention satisfaction.

    Post-Test (10 Weeks)

  • Retention

    ≥80 post-treatment, ≥75% 6 months follow up for self-report, performance based and Actigraph data (this includes valid data for all participants).

    Post-test (10 weeks), Follow-up (24 weeks)

  • Assessment Feasibility

    We calculated the proportion of assessment procedures that were administered as intended in the the checklists of the study protocol. The number of assessment procedures that were administered in line with the study's protocol checklists was divided by the total number of assessment procedures. The benchmark was set to 90%, i.e., assessment procedures were deemed feasible if ≥90% of assessment procedures were delivered as specified in the protocol.

    1 Year

  • Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire - Expectancy

    ≥80 chronic pain patients with expectancy scores higher than the subscale's mid-point, indicating intervention expectancy. Expectancy subscale scores range from 3 to 27. Higher scores indicate more belief that treatment will help.

    Baseline (0 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG-3) Scale

    Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)

  • WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS)

    Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)

  • 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

    Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)

  • ActiGraph GT9X

    Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)

  • PROMIS Depression v1.08b

    Baseline (0 Weeks), Post-Test (10 Weeks), Follow-Up (24 Weeks)

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

GetActive-Fitbit

EXPERIMENTAL

GetActive-Fitbit is an adaptation of the original GetActive-Fitbit program, a mind-body program for the unique needs of individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain that incorporates activity skills to help individuals improve all aspects of physical function. The GetActive-Fitbit sessions address mind-body skills (e.g., mindfulness, deep breathing, self-compassion), walking skills (e.g., step goals, quota-based pacing), and skills to change thinking (e.g., identify unhelpful thoughts about pain and activity, challenging thoughts). The format is a 10-week program delivered in-person with weekly group sessions and home practice of skills and walking.

Behavioral: GetActive-Fitbit

Healthy Living for Pain

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Healthy Living for Pain is an active intervention that will be dose, attention, and time matches to the GetActive-Fitbit program. Healthy Living for Pain is an adaptation of the Health Enhancement Program, developed by Dr. Vranceanu and colleagues from Stony Brook, with adjustments for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The Healthy Living for Pain sessions provide educational information on chronic musculoskeletal pain, the role of sleep and nutrition, physical activity, healthcare management, medication use, and social connection. The format is a 10-week program delivered in-person with weekly group sessions and home practice journaling.

Behavioral: Healthy Living for Pain

Interventions

GetActive-Fitbit is an adaptation of the original GetActive-Fitbit program, a mind-body program for the unique needs of individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain that incorporates activity skills to help individuals improve all aspects of physical function. The GetActive-Fitbit sessions address mind-body skills (e.g., mindfulness, deep breathing, self-compassion), walking skills (e.g., step goals, quota-based pacing), and skills to change thinking (e.g., identify unhelpful thoughts about pain and activity, challenging thoughts). The format is a 10-week program delivered in-person with weekly group sessions and home practice of skills and walking.

GetActive-Fitbit

Healthy Living for Pain is an active intervention that will be dose, attention, and time matches to the GetActive-Fitbit program. Healthy Living for Pain is an adaptation of the Health Enhancement Program, developed by Dr. Vranceanu and colleagues from Stony Brook, with adjustments for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The Healthy Living for Pain sessions provide educational information on chronic musculoskeletal pain, the role of sleep and nutrition, physical activity, healthcare management, medication use, and social connection. The format is a 10-week program delivered in-person with weekly group sessions and home practice journaling.

Healthy Living for Pain

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male and female outpatients, age 18 years or older
  • Fluent in English
  • Have nonmalignant chronic musculoskeletal pain for more than 3 months
  • Able to perform a 6-minute walk test (6MWT)
  • Owns a smartphone with Bluetooth 4.0 or computer
  • Willingness and ability to participate in one of the 2 programs and to comply with the requirements of the study protocol.
  • Free of concurrent psychotropic medication for at least 2 weeks prior to initiation of treatment, OR stable on current medication for a minimum of 6 weeks and willing to maintain a stable dose
  • Low-level of activity (must meet 2/3 criteria; if difficult to assess, recruiter may ask participant to report their recent step data from their smartphone to better understand their activity level)
  • Sitting for more than 8 hours/day per self-report
  • Exercising for fewer than 3 days/week (30+min of exercise constitutes an "exercise day") per self-report
  • Walking for fewer than 7 days/week (30+min of walking constitutes a "walking day") per self-report

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosed with a medical illness expected to worsen in the next 6 months (e.g., malignancy)
  • Serious mental illness or instability for which hospitalization may be likely in the next 6 months
  • Current active suicidal ideation reported on self-report
  • Untreated and/or unstable schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or other psychotic disorder
  • Current, active substance abuse or dependence, and current alcohol dependence within the past 6 months
  • Practice of yoga, meditation, guided imagery or other mind body techniques that elicit the RR, once per week for \>45 min 3 times/week within the last 3 months or less.
  • Regular use of Fitbit DMD in the last 3 months
  • Unable to walk/in a wheelchair
  • Mild cognitive decline for participants 65+ only (Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire; PMSQ 4 or more errors).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Rush Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States

Location

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

Location

Duke University

Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Greenberg J, Hooker JE, McDermott KA, La Camera DE, Brewer JR, Szapary CL, Somers TJ, Keefe F, Kelleher SA, Fisher HM, Burns J, Jeddi R, Kulich R, Polykoff GI, Parker RA, Vranceanu AM; THRIVE Study Team; Diachina A, Hogan S, Chou N, Yates L. Feasibility of a Mind-Body Program for Chronic Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2515685. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15685.

  • Hooker JE, Brewer JR, McDermott KA, Kanaya M, Somers TJ, Keefe F, Kelleher S, Fisher HM, Burns J, Jeddi RW, Kulich R, Polykoff G, Parker RA; THRIVE Study Team; Greenberg J, Vranceanu AM. Improving multimodal physical function in adults with heterogeneous chronic pain; Protocol for a multisite feasibility RCT. Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Mar;138:107462. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107462. Epub 2024 Jan 28.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Ana-Maria Vranceanu, PhD
Organization
Massachusetts General Hospital

Study Officials

  • Ana-Maria Vranceanu, PhD

    Massachusetts General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2023

First Posted

January 26, 2023

Study Start

April 1, 2023

Primary Completion

October 1, 2024

Study Completion

October 1, 2024

Last Updated

January 28, 2026

Results First Posted

July 16, 2025

Record last verified: 2026-01

Locations