Anterior Knee Pain in Mobile Bearing Versus Fixed Bearing in TKA
Effect of Using Mobile Bearing on the Incidence Rate of Anterior Knee Pain in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Patellar Resurfacing (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
1 other identifier
interventional
76
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Osteoarthritis is the most common cause of chronic joint disease, and its incidence has increased due to the high average life expectancy, in addition to the high incidence of obesity. Total knee arthroplasty is currently an accepted treatment for severe degenerative conditions and there are various implant systems with special features depending on component geometry, degree of fit of the articular surfaces, and fixation techniques. A tibial component with mobile polyethylene has been developed as an alternative to fixed polyethylene because it has theoretical advantages in terms of increasing the range of motion, reducing wear conditions, and reducing the incidence of anterior knee pain when the articular surface of the patella is not resurfaced.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 11, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 25, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 25, 2024
CompletedJuly 16, 2024
July 1, 2024
3.2 years
January 11, 2023
July 14, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Anterior knee pain
Anterior knee pain will be assessed by questionnaire.
1-2 years after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Knee Society Score (KSS)
1-2 years after surgery
Forgotten Joint Scale (FJS)
1-2 years after surgery
perioperative complications
assessed within two weeks intervals until 6 months after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Mobile Bearing Design TKA
EXPERIMENTALPatients who were randomized to receive the PFC Sigma Mobile Bearing TKA system
Fixed Bearing Design TKA
EXPERIMENTALPatients who were randomized to receive the PFC Sigma Fixed Bearing TKA system
Interventions
The prostheses will be cruciate scarifying cemented DePuy Synthes PFC Sigma with a Mobile Bearing system without resurfacing the patella.
The prostheses will be cruciate scarifying cemented DePuy Synthes PFC Sigma with a Fixed Bearing system without resurfacing the patella.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with expected primary total knee arthroplasty
You may not qualify if:
- Mediolateral instability
- Infective arthritis
- Severe deformity
- Revision
- Patients with severe obesity according to the Body Mass Index (BMI \< 35).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Damascus university
Damascus, Syria
Related Publications (8)
Huang CH, Ma HM, Lee YM, Ho FY. Long-term results of low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Nov;(416):265-70. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000093890.12372.46.
PMID: 14646769BACKGROUNDKim YH, Kook HK, Kim JS. Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Nov;(392):101-15. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00013.
PMID: 11716371BACKGROUNDDennis DA, Komistek RD, Scuderi GR, Zingde S. Factors affecting flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Nov;464:53-60. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31812f785d.
PMID: 17621230BACKGROUNDHooper G, Rothwell A, Frampton C. The low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a prospective study with a minimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Jan;91(1):58-63. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B1.20484.
PMID: 19092005BACKGROUNDLi B, Bai L, Fu Y, Wang G, He M, Wang J. Comparison of clinical outcomes between patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: retrospective study of 130 cases. J Int Med Res. 2012;40(5):1794-803. doi: 10.1177/030006051204000517.
PMID: 23206460BACKGROUNDKhan A, Pradhan N. Results of total knee replacement with/without resurfacing of the patella. Acta Ortop Bras. 2012;20(5):300-2. doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522012000500011.
PMID: 24453622BACKGROUNDWaters TS, Bentley G. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Feb;85(2):212-7. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200302000-00005.
PMID: 12571296BACKGROUNDBehrend H, Giesinger K, Giesinger JM, Kuster MS. The "forgotten joint" as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Mar;27(3):430-436.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
PMID: 22000572BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jaber Ibrahim, M.D, Ph.D
Damascus University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 11, 2023
First Posted
January 25, 2023
Study Start
January 15, 2021
Primary Completion
March 15, 2024
Study Completion
March 25, 2024
Last Updated
July 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share