The Impact of ResuGlove as a Chest Compression Feedback Device
ResuGlove
The Impact of Smart Resuscitation Glove (ResuGlove) as Chest Compression Feedback Devices During CPR Training: Feasibility Study of the Device Under Development
1 other identifier
interventional
29
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this simulation-based randomized trial is to assess if the newly proposed ResuGlove can improve the quality of chest compressions during CPR training of laypersons and inexperienced health professionals. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- 1.To determine if the newly developed wearable resuscitation gloves will improve the quality of chest compression during simulation-based CPR training
- 2.To determine the learnability and usability of the ResuGlove using the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 25, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 23, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 14, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 14, 2023
CompletedSeptember 15, 2023
September 1, 2023
4 months
December 1, 2022
September 14, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Average Chest compression depth
Chest compression depth is one of the most critical components of quality CPR. The current International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) guidelines recommended a chest compression depth of 5-6 cm for improved outcomes.
At zero time point (first round) and crossover at 30 minutes (second round)
Average chest compression rate
The compression rate is another essential component of quality CPR. The current International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) guidelines recommended a chest compression rate of 100 to 1200 per minute for improved outcomes.
At zero time point (first round) and crossover at 30 minutes (second round)
Proportion of chest recoil
Complete chest release (recoil) between each compression is essential to allow the heart to accumulate blood to be pumped during compressions. Therefore, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) guidelines recommended complete chest recoil (100%) during CPR for a better outcome.
At zero time point (first round) and crossover at 30 minutes (second round)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The proportion of correct compression depth
At zero time point (first round) and crossover at 30 minutes (second round)p
The proportion of correct compression rate
At zero time point (first round) and crossover at 30 minutes (second round)
Learnability and usability of the ResuGlove under development
At the end of the second round (30 to 40 minutes)
Study Arms (2)
ResuGlove group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the ResuGlove group will be guided by the audio feedback from the smart resuscitation glove.
Traditional CPR group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in the traditional CPR group will perform chest compressions without guidance from the smart resuscitation glove.
Interventions
Participants will be randomly assigned into two equal groups using the online-based random number generator (https://www.random.org). Participants in the ResuGlove group will perform hand-only CPR wearing the ResuGlove with a running feedback program for 2 minutes.
Participants in the traditional CPR group will perform hand-only CPR without the ResuGlove and feedback guidance for 2 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Nursing student from Turku University of Applied Sciences
- Students have a minimum of basic life support training
- Participants should be able to understand and communicate in English
You may not qualify if:
- Participants must not have previous experiences in actual patient resuscitation.
- Participants who are not able to understand and communicate in English
- Students with known cardiac/pulmonary diseases, back pain, and wrist problems
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Turkulead
- Aalto Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Turku
Turku, Southwest, 20520, Finland
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Desale T Kahsay, MSc
University of Turku
- STUDY CHAIR
Sanna Salanterä, Professor
University of Turku
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctoral researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2022
First Posted
January 25, 2023
Study Start
May 23, 2023
Primary Completion
September 14, 2023
Study Completion
September 14, 2023
Last Updated
September 15, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- When the summary data is published and made available by the Journal
- Access Criteria
- Access will be possible through the Journal website. The principal investigator is ready to share additional information regarding the trail following a genuine request.
Only outcomes of the analyzed data without personal identifiers will be publicly available after being published in an international journal.