NCT05695352

Brief Summary

This clinical trial determines if an oral medication taken within 2 days of anticipated ovulation will delay ovulation by 7 days. The study compares oral placebo tablets (control) to oral levonorgestrel, a synthetic hormone, and meloxicam, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (treatment) in 21 healthy women between the ages of 18 to 40. The control or treatment are taken 48 hours apart in the first and second menstrual cycle, respectively. The first dose is taken when the ovarian follicle has a diameter of 17 mm measured by transvaginal ultrasound. This follicle diameter is found 2 ± 1.0 days before ovulation. Ovulation is determined by a change in urinary hormone levels analyzed in first morning daily urine. The Investigators anticipate that the control cycle will have an interval to ovulation of ≤ 3 days from first placebo to ovulation while a delay of ≥7 days is found between first treatment to ovulation. A second question is to determine the side effects between control versus treatment based on symptoms such as nausea or abdominal cramping, change in blood pressure or pulse rate and the interval in menstrual bleeding. Each study participant has approximately 9 visits during each of two menstrual cycles. The visits between menstrual day 9 (first visit) to largest follicle are 3 to 6 depending upon follicle growth. A blood sample with a transvaginal ultrasound for ovarian follicle diameter is obtained at each visit. The appropriate medication is taken when the ovarian follicle largest diameter is 17 mm. The second dose is taken 2 days later with interim and final visits at 5 and 10 days following first dose. Each participant collects first morning urine from menstrual day 9 to 23. A teaspoonful of morning urine is placed in a storage tube and kept in a refrigerator freezer section until returned at a scheduled visit. All urine samples are kept frozen until analyzed for the metabolites of estrogen and progesterone by a central research laboratory. A change in the ratio of estrogen to progesterone metabolites is indicative of ovulation because more progesterone is secreted after ovulation from the ovary. The primary research outcome compares the interval in days from first dose of medication to ovulation between control and treatment. Secondary outcomes are menstrual cramps, vaginal bleeding, nausea, and headache, and changes in blood pressure, pulse, and interval between menstrual periods in control compared to treatment cycles.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
19

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2022

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 28, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 2, 2023

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 25, 2023

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 30, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 17, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

June 17, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

January 2, 2023

Results QC Date

April 1, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 20, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

FemaleHormonal ContraceptionEmergency contraceptionlevonorgestrelMeloxicam

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Interval to Ovulation in Normal Women Following Placebo is Anticipated to be Three Days Compared to Seven Days Following Levonorgestrel Plus Meloxicam

    The participant will take the first dose of medication (either placebo or intervention) when an ovarian follicle measuring at least 17 mm in diameter is found on transvaginal ultrasound and a second dose 48 hours later. Daily morning urine samples were analyzed for pregnanediol-3-glucuronide (PDG) and creatinine. A 100% increase in urinary PDG levels was used to indicate day of ovulation, also known as the follicular luteal shift. The interval from first dose of placebo to follicular luteal shift is estimated to be three days. The active treatment will be given the same way during the subsequent second cycle when the ovarian follicle diameter is also at least 17 mm. The intervention outcome is estimated to be a delay of seven or more days from first dose to the follicular luteal shift or ovulation.

    The outcome will be assessed at the end of the first and second menstrual cycle of 28 ± 2.0 Days, respectively in up to two menstrual cycles.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Safety Using Blood Pressure, Specifically Systolic Blood Pressure

    Changes in the mean sitting systolic blood pressure during the placebo and intervention menstrual cycles. For each cycle, sitting blood pressures were measured on the following days: first dose, second dose and ten days from first dose.

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Menstrual Bleeding Interval for Both the Placebo and Intervention Cycle.

    Menstrual interval for both placebo and intervention cycles; from menstrual day 1 to end of cycle in placebo compared to intervention cycle with each cycle approximately 28 ± 2.0 days. Measurements are made in up to two menstrual cycles.

  • Unscheduled Vaginal Bleeding

    All incidences of unscheduled bleeding within the placebo and intervention cycles were collected, with each cycle approximately 28 ± 2.0 days.

  • Report the Number of Participants Who Reported Adverse Events in Both the Placebo and Intervention Arms

    Events are measured from day one to end of cycle in placebo cycle compared to day one to end of cycle in the intervention cycle with each cycle anticipated to be 28 ± 2.0 days. Adverse events are collected for two menstrual cycles.

Study Arms (1)

Placebo comparator in first menstrual cycle and Intervention in the second menstrual cycle

EXPERIMENTAL

The two arm placebo comparator study will use each participant as her own control with a placebo arm in the first menstrual cycle consisting of two placebo tablets taken at the time of the ovarian follicle measuring 17 mm in diameter and a second dose of two tablets 48 hours later. During the subsequent second menstrual cycle the participant will take the intervention, one tablet of levonorgestrel 1.5 mg and one tablet of meloxicam 15 mg, at the time of the ovarian follicle measures at least 17 mm in diameter and a second dose of the two tablets intervention 48 hours later.

Drug: Levonorgestrel 1.5mgDrug: Meloxicam 15 mgOther: Placebo

Interventions

oral synthetic progesterone agonist

Also known as: Plan B one step
Placebo comparator in first menstrual cycle and Intervention in the second menstrual cycle

Non steroidal autoinflammatory drug inhibiting both Cyclooxygenase -1 and -2 enzymes

Also known as: Mobic
Placebo comparator in first menstrual cycle and Intervention in the second menstrual cycle
PlaceboOTHER

Each tablet contains Calcium Carbonate 1000 mg

Also known as: TUMS
Placebo comparator in first menstrual cycle and Intervention in the second menstrual cycle

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsFemale with normal ovarian function
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • \. Female in good general health with no chronic medical conditions that result in periodic exacerbations that require significant medical care.
  • \. Age between 18 to 40 years inclusive at time of enrollment. 3. BMI ≤30 kg/m² and no recent rapid weight loss or gain. 4. Intact uterus with both ovaries intact. 5. PAP test within ASCCP or ACOG guidelines such that additional testing or evaluation will not be required during the study period. If there is no copy of a recent PAP test and the subject is 21 years or older a Pap test should be done during the screening visit.
  • \. Regular menstrual cycles with an interval of 24 to 32 days:
  • If postpartum of post-second trimester abortion, she must have 5 menses prior to enrollment.
  • If the subject has had a first trimester pregnancy loss or abortion, she must have one spontaneous menses prior to enrollment.
  • \. Have a negative urine pregnancy test on menstrual cycle day 9 pre-treatment visit.
  • \. Not at risk of pregnancy for the duration of the study defined as heterosexually abstinent, prior female or male permanent contraception, non-hormonal intrauterine device or willing to use a non-hormonal barrier contraceptive method with each act of intercourse until study exit.
  • \. Subject is willing and able in the Investigators opinion of complying with protocol requirement's 10. Subject is willing to collect daily urine first morning urine and store them until collected.
  • \. Lives within the study catchment area or a reasonable distance from the study site.
  • \. Understands and signs the IRB approved informed consents prior to undergoing any screening assessment.
  • \. Agrees not to participate in any other clinical trials during the course of this study.
  • \. Screening serum progesterone level greater than 3 ng/ml.

You may not qualify if:

  • Known hypersensitivity or contraindications to progestins.
  • Abnormal transvaginal ultrasound or safety laboratory results evaluated during the screening period recognized as clinically significant aby the investigator or medically qualified designee.
  • Known or suspected alcohol or marijuana abuse.
  • Undiagnosed abnormal genital bleeding.
  • Undiagnosed vaginal discharge, lesions or abnormalities. Women with a history of genital herpes can be included if the outbreaks are infrequent. Antiviral prophylaxis is allowed.
  • Uncontrolled Thyroid disorder.
  • Current use of hormonal contraception or a levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine device.
  • Use of a long-acting injectable hormonal contraceptive within the past 6 months unless has had at least one spontaneous menstrual cycle (two menstrual bleeding episodes) since the last injection.
  • Breastfeeding women or those who have not had a spontaneous menstrual bleed since discontinuing breastfeeding.
  • Women who plan a major surgical procedure during the study.
  • Women who plan to become pregnant during their participation in the study.
  • Women who smoke \>15 cigarettes per day or who use \>1 mL/day of nicotine-containing liquid for electronic cigarettes.
  • Current or history of ischemic heart disease or stroke while pregnant or during use of hormonal contraception.
  • Current or past deep vein thrombosis or thromboembolic disorder.
  • Personal or family history of thrombophilia
  • +18 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Carolina Women's Research and Wellness Center

Raleigh, North Carolina, 27713, United States

Location

Related Publications (25)

  • Daniels K, Mosher WD. Contraceptive methods women have ever used: United States, 1982-2010. Natl Health Stat Report. 2013 Feb 14;(62):1-15.

    PMID: 24988816BACKGROUND
  • Moreau C, Cleland K, Trussell J. Contraceptive discontinuation attributed to method dissatisfaction in the United States. Contraception. 2007 Oct;76(4):267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.06.008. Epub 2007 Aug 28.

    PMID: 17900435BACKGROUND
  • Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception. 2004 Aug;70(2):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.03.009.

    PMID: 15288211BACKGROUND
  • Simmons RG, Sanders JN, Geist C, Gawron L, Myers K, Turok DK. Predictors of contraceptive switching and discontinuation within the first 6 months of use among Highly Effective Reversible Contraceptive Initiative Salt Lake study participants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;220(4):376.e1-376.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.022. Epub 2018 Dec 18.

    PMID: 30576664BACKGROUND
  • Bradley SEK, Polis CB, Bankole A, Croft T. Global Contraceptive Failure Rates: Who Is Most at Risk? Stud Fam Plann. 2019 Mar;50(1):3-24. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12085. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

    PMID: 30791104BACKGROUND
  • Pace LE, Dusetzina SB, Keating NL. Early Impact Of The Affordable Care Act On Oral Contraceptive Cost Sharing, Discontinuation, And Nonadherence. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Sep 1;35(9):1616-24. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1624.

    PMID: 27605641BACKGROUND
  • Duffy DM, Ko C, Jo M, Brannstrom M, Curry TE. Ovulation: Parallels With Inflammatory Processes. Endocr Rev. 2019 Apr 1;40(2):369-416. doi: 10.1210/er.2018-00075.

    PMID: 30496379BACKGROUND
  • Croxatto HB, Devoto L, Durand M, Ezcurra E, Larrea F, Nagle C, Ortiz ME, Vantman D, Vega M, von Hertzen H. Mechanism of action of hormonal preparations used for emergency contraception: a review of the literature. Contraception. 2001 Mar;63(3):111-21. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00184-6. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11368982BACKGROUND
  • Brache V, Cochon L, Deniaud M, Croxatto HB. Ulipristal acetate prevents ovulation more effectively than levonorgestrel: analysis of pooled data from three randomized trials of emergency contraception regimens. Contraception. 2013 Nov;88(5):611-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.05.010. Epub 2013 May 22.

    PMID: 23809278BACKGROUND
  • Glasier A, Cameron ST, Blithe D, Scherrer B, Mathe H, Levy D, Gainer E, Ulmann A. Can we identify women at risk of pregnancy despite using emergency contraception? Data from randomized trials of ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel. Contraception. 2011 Oct;84(4):363-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.02.009. Epub 2011 Apr 2.

    PMID: 21920190BACKGROUND
  • Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception. 2011 May;83(5):397-404. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.021. Epub 2011 Mar 12.

    PMID: 21477680BACKGROUND
  • Raymond EG, Shochet T, Drake JK, Westley E. What some women want? On-demand oral contraception. Contraception. 2014 Aug;90(2):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 Apr 21.

  • Venners SA, Liu X, Perry MJ, Korrick SA, Li Z, Yang F, Yang J, Lasley BL, Xu X, Wang X. Urinary estrogen and progesterone metabolite concentrations in menstrual cycles of fertile women with non-conception, early pregnancy loss or clinical pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2006 Sep;21(9):2272-80. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del187. Epub 2006 Jun 23.

  • Croxatto HB, Brache V, Pavez M, Cochon L, Forcelledo ML, Alvarez F, Massai R, Faundes A, Salvatierra AM. Pituitary-ovarian function following the standard levonorgestrel emergency contraceptive dose or a single 0.75-mg dose given on the days preceding ovulation. Contraception. 2004 Dec;70(6):442-50. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.05.007.

  • Devoto L, Fuentes A, Palomino A, Espinoza A, Kohen P, Ranta S, von Hertzen H. Pharmacokinetics and endometrial tissue levels of levonorgestrel after administration of a single 1.5-mg dose by the oral and vaginal route. Fertil Steril. 2005 Jul;84(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.01.106.

  • Duffy DM. Novel contraceptive targets to inhibit ovulation: the prostaglandin E2 pathway. Hum Reprod Update. 2015 Sep-Oct;21(5):652-70. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv026. Epub 2015 May 29.

  • Glasier A. Emergency contraception: clinical outcomes. Contraception. 2013 Mar;87(3):309-13. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.027. Epub 2012 Oct 4.

  • Gemzell-Danielsson K, Berger C, P G L L. Emergency contraception -- mechanisms of action. Contraception. 2013 Mar;87(3):300-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.021. Epub 2012 Oct 29.

  • Halpern V, Raymond EG, Lopez LM. Repeated use of pre- and postcoital hormonal contraception for prevention of pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 26;2014(9):CD007595. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007595.pub3.

  • Festin MP, Bahamondes L, Nguyen TM, Habib N, Thamkhantho M, Singh K, Gosavi A, Bartfai G, Bito T, Bahamondes MV, Kapp N. A prospective, open-label, single arm, multicentre study to evaluate efficacy, safety and acceptability of pericoital oral contraception using levonorgestrel 1.5 mg. Hum Reprod. 2016 Mar;31(3):530-40. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev341. Epub 2016 Jan 31.

  • Jesam C, Salvatierra AM, Schwartz JL, Croxatto HB. Suppression of follicular rupture with meloxicam, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor: potential for emergency contraception. Hum Reprod. 2010 Feb;25(2):368-73. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep392. Epub 2009 Nov 19.

  • Bata MS, Al-Ramahi M, Salhab AS, Gharaibeh MN, Schwartz J. Delay of ovulation by meloxicam in healthy cycling volunteers: A placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study. J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Aug;46(8):925-32. doi: 10.1177/0091270006289483.

  • Massai MR, Forcelledo ML, Brache V, Tejada AS, Salvatierra AM, Reyes MV, Alvarez F, Faundes A, Croxatto HB. Does meloxicam increase the incidence of anovulation induced by single administration of levonorgestrel in emergency contraception? A pilot study. Hum Reprod. 2007 Feb;22(2):434-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del369. Epub 2006 Sep 15.

  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.

  • Santoro N, Crawford SL, Allsworth JE, Gold EB, Greendale GA, Korenman S, Lasley BL, McConnell D, McGaffigan P, Midgely R, Schocken M, Sowers M, Weiss G. Assessing menstrual cycles with urinary hormone assays. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Mar;284(3):E521-30. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00381.2002. Epub 2002 Nov 19.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

LevonorgestrelMeloxicam

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

NorgestrelNorpregnenesNorpregnanesNorsteroidsSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsThiazinesSulfur CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsThiazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Limitations and Caveats

We needed 22 women to complete the study in order to show that the intervention significantly delayed ovulation compared to placebo. Only 19 women were enrolled with two women being dropped from the analysis, one did not do the intervention arm, and one was anovulatory in both cycles. There were significant problems with recruiting despite numerous attempts by the clinical site with participants mentioning that the number of visits and proximity of each visit made it difficult to schedule.

Results Point of Contact

Title
David F. Archer, MD, Chief Executive Officer
Organization
InnovaGyn, Inc.

Study Officials

  • David F. Archer, MD

    InnovaGyn, Inc.

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • William L. McPheat, PhD

    InnovaGyn, Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
This open label study will be masked by not allowing the analysis of the urine samples collected for determining the day of the follicular luteal transition (ovulation) to be known to the laboratory director and technicians.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: The study design is an open label randomized single blind clinical trial in which each participant will receive placebo two tablets 48 hours apart in their first menstrual cycle and then levonorgestrel plus meloxicam 48 hours apart in their subsequent menstrual cycle. We will compare the interval from taking the first dose of medication to the development of a functioning corpus luteum based on the shift in the ratio of urinary estrone-3-glucuronide(EC) / pregnanediol-3-glucuronide (PDG). An "n" of 21 was calculated using the Log-Rank Test method and setting the Power to 80% and alpha to 0.05 to test the hypothesis that there was no difference between the "survival curves" for the placebo and drug-treated cycles.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief Executive Officer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2023

First Posted

January 25, 2023

Study Start

June 28, 2022

Primary Completion

November 30, 2024

Study Completion

November 30, 2025

Last Updated

June 17, 2026

Results First Posted

June 17, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

As part of the NIH share plan data regarding the outcome of the clinical trial will be shared with other investigators. We do not plan to share biologic samples of blood and urine since they will be analyzed and destroyed upon completion of the study.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
Upon completion of the study and with acceptance of the outcome manuscript by a professional journal.
Access Criteria
The Access Criteria to be shared are: 1. Differences in the interval from first dose of placebo or treatment to ovulation. This interval is the primary outcome. 2. All treatment emergent adverse events. 3. The menstrual bleeding interval and unscheduled bleeding. 4. Blood pressure and pulse between treatments

Locations