Evaluation of Neuronal Damage in Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy With Biomarkers
Evaluation of Intraoperative Neuronal Damage in Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy With S100beta, GFAP and NSE Biomarkers
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery has become an alternative to open or laparoscopic technique in various surgical fields. Robot assisted laparoscopic surgery is preferred by surgeons and patients due to easy accessibility, lower blood loss and lower transfusion rates. However, robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery can cause significant changes in cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic and cerebral physiology because it requires a deep trendy position. When long -lasting deep trendelenburg position is applied, the cerebral autoregulation is impaired. In the literature, the presence of cases with brain edema is shown. In recent years, many biomarkers have been used in the evaluation of brain damage. S100 Calcium Binding Protein (S100β), N Ron specific enolase (NSE), Glial Fibrils are among the biomarkers used to show acidic protein (GFAP) brain damage. The S100β is specific and is mainly produced by astrocytes and enters the bloodstream after neuron damage. Glial fibrils is an acidic protein (GFAP), a protein encoded by the GFAP gene in humans, an intermediate filament protein produced in the central nervous system. Neuron specific enolase (NSE) is one of the enzymes that increase brain damage encoded by Enolase 2 (ENO2) gene. Mini Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment will be performed to determine neurological changes developing in patients. The purpose of this study; Robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery is to examine the brain damage that may develop in patients due to deep trendelenburg position in patients with the said biomarkers and to evaluate the anesthesia methods applied in these surgery in line with the study results.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 8, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 12, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2024
CompletedJanuary 20, 2023
January 1, 2023
1.9 years
January 12, 2023
January 12, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
brain damage
Brain damge between the two groups will be compared
in 96 hours
Study Arms (2)
Group with Sevoflurane
The Sevoflurane used for maintenance of general anesthesia
Group with Propofol
The Propofol (IV) used for maintenance of general anesthesia
Interventions
MMSE and MoCA will be applied preoperative,postoperative first day and fourth day S100B,GFAP and NSE will be measured in blood tests preoperative,postoperative second hour,postoperative 24. hour and postoperative 96. hour
Eligibility Criteria
Patients aged 18-75 who were operated on under general anesthesia for RALRP surgery
You may qualify if:
- All patients aged 18-75 who were operated on under general anesthesia for RALRP surgery and agreed to participate in the study will be included.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants who did not accept the study, had active intracranial pathology and history of intracranial pathology will not be included in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Akdeniz University Hospital
Antalya, 07070, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Schramm P, Treiber AH, Berres M, Pestel G, Engelhard K, Werner C, Closhen D. Time course of cerebrovascular autoregulation during extreme Trendelenburg position for robotic-assisted prostatic surgery. Anaesthesia. 2014 Jan;69(1):58-63. doi: 10.1111/anae.12477. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
PMID: 24256501BACKGROUNDAmoo M, Henry J, O'Halloran PJ, Brennan P, Husien MB, Campbell M, Caird J, Javadpour M, Curley GF. S100B, GFAP, UCH-L1 and NSE as predictors of abnormalities on CT imaging following mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Apr;45(2):1171-1193. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01678-z. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
PMID: 34709508BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PROFFESSOR,MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 12, 2023
First Posted
January 20, 2023
Study Start
March 8, 2022
Primary Completion
February 1, 2024
Study Completion
March 1, 2024
Last Updated
January 20, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01