Optimized Care of People With Diabetes and Foot Complication in Primary Care
1 other identifier
observational
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to create and evaluate and new management, by using eHealth tools, to prevent diabetic foot ulcers. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- 1.Validation
- 2.Mapping
- 3.How do health care professionals and patients with diabetes experience that the future foot examination should be designed?
- 4.What experiences have health care professionals and patients with diabetes to use an eHealth tool supporting the annual foot examination?
- 5.Interviews - to use a paper format supporting a structured foot assessment
- 6.Interviews - footwear
- 7.Interviews - usability test of using an eHealth tool
- 8.Exists complexity in the development, test, management, spread and sustain of an eHealth tool supporting foot examination and self-care of the feet in diabetes.
- 9.How could a digital eHealth solution be implemented, managed and spread in public health care setting?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2020
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 7, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
ExpectedApril 17, 2024
April 1, 2024
5 years
January 7, 2023
April 16, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Validation
A valid foot examination routine is developed and presented in paper format.
2020-2021
Mapping
A variety of points of views are gathered regarding how the future foot care process should be managed. The method used Concept Mapping, is a methodology for mapping ideas that integrates input from multiple sources with differing expertise or interest, creates maps with multivariate data analyses that depict the composite thinking of the group, and yields data that allows for comparisons across rating criteria, stakeholder groups, different points in time, etc. to aid in targeted planning, implementation strategies, and evaluation. Group concept mapping is related to the growing interest in the role that theory plays in planning and evaluation.
2020-2023
Interviews - to use a paper format supporting a structured foot assessment
Experiences regarding how do health care professionals experienced it to use a structured foot form, in paper form will be gathered using qualitative content analysis, as described by Graneheim and Lundman, is considered appropriate in order inductively to focus on and describe experiences and variations on an individual level and to identify differences and similarities on a manifest and latent level. The analysis will be conducted in several steps. First, all the data will be read several times to ensure immersion in the data. All interview text will be regarded as a unit of analysis. The text will then be divided into "meaning units" that corresponded to the aim of the study. Each meaning unit will be condensed and labelled with a code. Codes are described as concrete and as close to the text as possible. Semi-structured interviews will be held with two focus groups and individual interviews.
2020-2023
Interviews - footwear
Factors are summarized regarding how patients with diabetes choose their footwear will be gathered using qualitative content analysis, as described by Graneheim and Lundman, is considered appropriate in order inductively to focus on and describe experiences and variations on an individual level and to identify differences and similarities on a manifest and latent level. The analysis will be conducted in several steps. First, all the data will be read several times to ensure immersion in the data. All interview text will be regarded as a unit of analysis. The text will then be divided into "meaning units" that corresponded to the aim of the study. Each meaning unit will be condensed and labelled with a code. Codes are described as concrete and as close to the text as possible. Semi-structured interviews will be held with two focus groups or individual interviews.
2023-2025
Interviews - usability test of using an eHealth tool
The usability lab test is usually performed in three stages: preparation/planning, actual test and follow-up . After preparation the test will be performed, in three phases: the pre-test phase, the actual test and the post-test phase. The participants will follow the tasks assigned to the test and will be encouraged to think aloud while performing the test to gather more substantial and qualitative data. After the test, the users will be debriefed, preferably using both questionnaires and interviews. In the follow-up stage, the recordings are coded and collected data are analyzed. Specific problems found are analyzed in detail and results will be reported. System Usability Scale, a test used to gather test participants' expectations/experiences when the usability test will be used (0-100 scale).
2020-2024
Experiences of using an eHealth tool supporting the foot assessment
Users, will reported how they expected and perceived it to use an eHealth tool supporting the foot examination evaluated with System Usability Scale (SUS). SUS is a test used to gather test participants' expectations/experiences when the usability test will be used (0-100 scale
2020-2024
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Questionnaires regarding self-perceived quality of life, the experiences of the visit at the care unit, transportation to the care unit.
2020-2025
Critical evaluation of complexity
2020-2025
Long term effect
2023-2028
Study Arms (2)
1: Patients being foot examined by using an eHealth tool
Patients being foot examined by using an eHealth tool
2: Patients being foot examined in traditional manner
Patients being foot examined in traditional manner
Interventions
Patients being foot examined by using an eHealth tool that has been developed, will be tested with the intention to implement the eHealth tool
Patient are being foot examined in the way as health care professionals usually make the foot examination in patients with diabetes
Eligibility Criteria
Patients Patients living in Region Västra Götaland being treated in a care unit in the same region. Professionals Professionalsm working in Region Västra Götaland being treating patientes in a care unit in the same region.
You may qualify if:
- Persons with diabetes being treated in Region Västra Götaland
- Understand spoken and written Swedish
You may not qualify if:
- Not understand spoken and written Swedish
- Professionals working with patients with diabetes having foot complications.
- Working in Region Västra Götaland
- Understand spoken and written Swedish
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sahlgrenska University Hospitallead
- Vastra Gotaland Regioncollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Departmetn of Prosthetics & Orthotics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Gothenburg, 41285, Sweden
Related Publications (2)
Hellstrand Tang U, Scandurra I, Sundberg L, Annersten Gershater M, Zugner R. Patients' Expectations of Evidence-Based Service at the Pharmacy Regarding Information on Self-Care of the Feet for Persons with Diabetes at Risk of Developing Foot Ulcers - A Cross-Sectional Observational Study in Sweden. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Dec 27;17:3557-3576. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S435632. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 38169667DERIVEDAndersson S, Scandurra I, Nystrom U, Varemo M, Hellstrand Tang U. Experiences of a Novel Structured Foot Examination Form for Patients With Diabetes From the Perspective of Health Care Professionals: Qualitative Study. JMIR Nurs. 2023 Jul 18;6:e45501. doi: 10.2196/45501.
PMID: 37463012DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 7, 2023
First Posted
January 20, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
April 17, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04