Quantitative Assessment of the Efficacy of Two Irrigation Activation Systems
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aim of the present study was to determine the intraradicular microbiota of previously root canal-treated teeth with apical periodontitis using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) and to investigate the antibacterial effectiveness of different irrigation activation methods \[ XP-endo Finisher and EndoActivator \] that will make classical chemomechanical preparation more effective. This superiority, parallel, randomized clinical trial was conducted in the clinic of the Endodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul. 20 patients with posttreatment apical periodontitis (one tooth each) were randomly allocated into two groups according to the used (n=10, for each): the EA group (A) or the XPF group (B). Total bacterial loads, as well as the amount of Enterococcus faecalis (E.faecalis) were determined before (S1) and after (S2) chemomechanical preparation and finally, after intracanal medication (S3) by means of ddPCR.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 7, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 2, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 2, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 19, 2023
CompletedMay 6, 2023
May 1, 2023
7 months
December 16, 2022
May 4, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the sequence analysis of 16S rRNA genes by the Sanger sequencing
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Study Arms (2)
XP-endo Finisher
EXPERIMENTALuse of XP-endo Finisher
EndoActivator
EXPERIMENTALuse of EndoActivator
Interventions
XPF : The canals were flushed with 2.5 mL 2.5% NaOCl for 30 s and activated by a XPF instrument that was placed in the canal to 1 mm short of the WL and powered by the motor at 800 rpm (1 N-cm torque) for 30 s according to the manufacturer's instructions. Then the canals were rinsed with 2.5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl, followed by activation of the substance with the XPF instrument for 30 seconds, the same way as above. A new XP-endo Finisher file was used for each canal.
The root canals were irrigated with 2.5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl for 30 s, followed by sonic activation of this solution with EndoActivator red tip size #25/0.04, inserted into the root canal 1 mm short of the WL, at 10,000 cpm/min. for 30 seconds. The EA polymer tip moved vertically from apical to coronal part of the canal during activation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- root canal-treated teeth exhibiting clinical and radiographic evidence of chronic apical periodontitis lesions.
- Teeth with post-treatment apical periodontitis had endodontic therapy completed more than 2 years earlier and required retreatment.
- Radiographically, the diameter of the periapical radiolucency ranged from 2 to 7 mm.
- Termini of the root canal fillings ranged from 0-4 mm short of the radiographic apex, with no overfilling.
- The teeth had intact coronal restorations, with no obvious exposure of the root-filling material to the oral cavity.
- Selected teeth had enough crown structure for adequate isolation with a rubber dam and showed an absence of periodontal pockets or attachment level deeper than 4 mm.
You may not qualify if:
- teeth from patients who had received antibiotics within the previous 3 months or who had any general disease, teeth that could not be properly isolated with rubber dam, teeth with absence of coronary sealing, teeth with periodontal pocket depth \>4 mm; and teeth with crown/root fracture. Only one tooth was included from each patient.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Dentistry
Istanbul, Esenler, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
SEYDA ERSAHAN, Assoc.Prof.
IstanbulMedipol University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- The Antimicrobial Efficacy of Sweeps Laser Compared to Ultrasonically Activated Irrigation and Needle Irrigation in Posterior Teeth With Apical Periodontitis: A Clinical Study
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2022
First Posted
January 19, 2023
Study Start
February 7, 2022
Primary Completion
September 2, 2022
Study Completion
December 2, 2022
Last Updated
May 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05