EMA_Normalization of Alcohol Drinking in Young Adults
Normalization of Alcohol Drinking Due to Exposure to Alcohol Marketing in Young Adults: a Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) With Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA)
1 other identifier
interventional
371
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This proposed study aims to evaluate incentive strategies on compliance rate of EMA, assess young adults' exposure to alcohol marketing, and its effect on receptivity outcomes, belief in normalization of alcohol drinking and alcohol consumption. The objectives are:
- 1.To compare the compliance rate of EMA between participants receiving one-off bonus and incremental incentive and receiving incremental incentive only.
- 2.To assess the association between exposure to alcohol marketing and drinking normalization, in terms of perceived popularity (descriptive norm), perceived social approval (injunctive norm) and positive expectancy.
- 3.To assess the association between exposure to alcohol marketing and alcohol consumption.
- 4.To assess the association between exposure frequency and receptivity to alcohol marketing.
- 5.To assess the association between receptivity to alcohol marketing and drinking normalization.
- 6.To assess the association between receptivity to alcohol marketing and alcohol consumption.
- 7.To explore factor structure of perceived popularity (descriptive norm), perceived social approval (injunctive norm) and positive expectancy.
- 8.To analyse drinking normalization effect in mediating the association between exposure to alcohol marketing, and alcohol consumption, and between receptivity and alcohol consumption.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 19, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 26, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2023
CompletedApril 6, 2025
April 1, 2025
5 months
December 30, 2022
April 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Compliance rate of EMA questionnaires
All participant will be asked to answer the EMA questionnaires 3 times per day for consecutively 21 days. For each EMA survey, participants will have 30 mins to complete it. The compliance rate will be calculated by total number of completed EMA surveys divided by total numbers of EMA surveys (total n=63 surveys, 21 days Ă— 3 surveys/day).
3-week EMA period
Exposure frequency to alcohol marketing
In each EMA prompt, participants will be asked whether they have seen any alcohol marketing in the past 5 hours (except for the first EMA survey of the day, which asks about the period starting from the last EMA on the previous day rather than the past 5 hours), the channels of exposure, and types of alcoholic beverages.
3-week EMA period
Receptivity to alcohol marketing
In each reported exposure in EMA, participants will be asked to rate five statements to examine their receptivity to alcohol marketing. The five sentences are as follows: (1) I like the ad; (2) I feel the main actors in the ads are attractive; (3) I feel the ad is creative; (4) the ad content/branding suits my personal image/status; and (5) drinking is portrayed as a positive behavior. These items will be rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
3-week EMA period
Perceived popularity of drinking
Subjects will be asked to respond to some statements with various views on alcohol drinking. such as "Out of 10, how many drinkers do you think in your peers in Hong Kong?" (0-10 points, 0=not at all common, 10=very common).
Baseline and 1-month follow-up
Perceived social approval of drinking
Participants will be asked to rate the extent they agree (from 1: strongly disagree to 5: strongly agree) with various views on alcohol drinking. such as "I accept myself to drink in public occasions".
Baseline and 1-month follow-up
Positive expectancy of drinking
Participants will be asked 20 items to rate their extent of agreement (from 1: disagree to 4: agree) with various views on alcohol drinking. Such as "I would act sociable",
Baseline and 1-month follow-up
Negative expectancy of drinking
Participants will be asked 18 items to rate their extent of agreement (from 1: disagree to 4: agree) with various views on alcohol drinking. Such as "I would be clumsy",
Baseline and 1-month follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Frequency of drunk
Baseline and 1-month follow-up
Alcohol consumption
Baseline, 1-month follow-up and 3-week EMA period
Auxiliary outcome
1-month follow-up
Other Outcomes (11)
Covariate 1
Baseline and 1-month follow-up
Covariate 2
Baseline and 1-month follow-up
Covariate 3
Baseline and 1-month follow-up
- +8 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention group will first receive 3 times EMA per day for 21 consecutive days. This assessment length was designed to capture participants' exposure to alcohol marketing for a long period of time. The EMA will include questions about self-reported exposure to and /or responses to alcohol marketing. The intervention group participants should complete at least two EMA surveys in a day and need to comply with the intervention at least 85% of the time.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group will first receive 3 times EMA per day for 21 consecutive days. This assessment length was designed to capture participants' exposure to alcohol marketing for a long period of time. The EMA will include questions about self-reported exposure to and /or responses to alcohol marketing. The conrol group participants should complete at least two EMA surveys in a day and No intervention will be provided after completing the 21 consecutive days EMA documentation.
Interventions
This study will compare the effect of fixed and incremental incentive strategies on compliance rates. All participants will be promised a basic incentive. An additional gift voucher will be given to intervention group participants who comply with the intervention at least 85% of the time, whereas a basic incentive will only be given to control group participants.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Own a mobile smartphone with internet access
- Drank any alcohol in past 30 days (current drinkers)
- Will be in Hong Kong during the 3-week EMA study period
- Able to read and write in Chinese.
You may not qualify if:
- Did not drink any alcohol in the past 30 days
- Will not be in Hong Kong during the study period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The University of Hong Konglead
- Research Grants Council, Hong Kongcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
LKS Faculty of Medicine
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 00, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Derek YT Cheung, PhD
The University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 30, 2022
First Posted
January 19, 2023
Study Start
January 26, 2023
Primary Completion
June 30, 2023
Study Completion
June 30, 2023
Last Updated
April 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- 3 years after the completion of the relevant publications.
Research data and documentation will be available upon request made to the principal investigator