Comparison of Picosecond Lasers vs. Ablative Fractional Er:YAG Lasers in Treating Atrophic Scar
Comparison of 1064nm Nd:YAG Picosecond Lasers Using Fractional Micro-lens Array vs. Ablative Fractional 2940nm Er:YAG Lasers for the Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scar in Asians: a 20-week Prospective, Randomized, Split-face, Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond lasers using fractional micro-lens array (P-MLA) was a promising therapy for skin resurfacing. However, no studies have compared P-MLA with ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG lasers (AF-Er) in treating atrophic acne scars. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of P-MLA and AF-Er for the treatment of atrophic acne scars, we performed a prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled trial. Thirty-one Asian patients underwent four consecutive sessions of randomized split-face treatment with P-MLA and AF-Fr at 4-week intervals.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 12, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 9, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 17, 2023
CompletedFebruary 8, 2023
April 1, 2022
6 months
January 9, 2023
February 5, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Efficacy of scar improvement evaluated by investigators
the Echelle d'Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'acne (ECCA) grading scale and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scores
8 weeks after final treatment
Efficacy of scar improvement evaluated by patients
a Likert satisfaction scale (1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = slightly satisfied, 4 = satisfied, 5 = very satisfied)
8 weeks after final treatment
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Adverse effects of pain, erythema, edema, exudation, pinpoint bleeding and petechiae
Immediately after treatment.
Adverse effects of crust shedding time, duration of erythema and edema, post inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), scarring formation, pruritus and milia.
Through study completion, 8 weeks after final treatment
Study Arms (2)
P-MLA
EXPERIMENTALa fractional 1064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) picosecond laser with MLA handpiece (P-MLA for short)
AF-Er
SHAM COMPARATORablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG laser (AF-Er for short)
Interventions
Picosecond laser is a novel technology characterized by ultra-short, picosecond pulse duration which can be effective for many skin conditions, such as pigmentation, photoaging and wrinkles reduction. When combined with micro-lens array (MLA) optics, high-intensity, micro-injury zones can be generated in the epidermis and dermis, causing optical breakdown of surrounding tissue and stimulating of dermal remodeling with mild side-effects. Previous studies had showed the picosecond lasers with MLA afforded better or similar clinical outcomes as well as fewer side-effects in treating acne scar than non-ablative lasers.
2940-nm erbium yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser is one of the most commonly used treatments for atrophic acne scars, which can remove the damage tissue of the scars and allow collagen remodeling and re-epithelialization.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age ≥18 years;
- presence with similar atrophic acne scars on both sides of the face;
- signed informed consent and cooperated with the follow up and complied the study protocol.
You may not qualify if:
- a previous history of keloid or hypertrophic scar formation;
- undergone any acne scar treatments in the past 6 months before the first treatment;
- pregnant or lactating females;
- sensitive to lights;
- allergic to lidocaine;
- other preexisting skin conditions or uncontrolled systemic diseases.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009, China
Related Publications (1)
Dai R, Cao Y, Su Y, Cai S. Comparison of 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser using fractional micro-lens array vs. ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scar in Asians: a 20-week prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled pilot study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 16;10:1248831. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1248831. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 38034535DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dai Ru, Ph.D
2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2023
First Posted
January 17, 2023
Study Start
April 12, 2022
Primary Completion
September 30, 2022
Study Completion
October 31, 2022
Last Updated
February 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share