Efficacy/Safety of Urogynecology Synthetic Mesh Surgery
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Urogynecology Synthetic Mesh Surgery in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
1 other identifier
observational
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a retrospective cohort study, aiming at analyzing the efficacy and safety of mesh surgery in pelvic organ prolapse. The synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse include transvaginal mesh or laparotomy, laparoscope, or robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with mesh augmentation. The investigators would like to evaluate the efficacy and safety, such as recurrence rates and complication rates for women who underwent urogynecology mesh surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Aug 2022
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 28, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 12, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
ExpectedApril 5, 2023
April 1, 2023
1 year
December 28, 2022
April 2, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
trans-vaginal mesh repair
Urodynamic investigations (The urodynamic study included free uroflowmetry, postvoid residual, filling and voiding cystometry, and a urethral pressure profile. The filling cystometry and urethral pressure profile were performed with 37 degrees C normal saline similar to body temperature at an infusion rate of 80 ml/min. 1. The urodynamic data of POP patient with grade \> or = II, will be retrograde analyzed and and compared. 2. Pressure-associated parameters, such as abdominal pressure (Pabd), detrusor pressure (Pdet) will be measured as centimeter of water column (cmH2O), volume-associated parameters, such as infused volume (Vinf), voided volume (Vvod) and intravesical volume (Vive) will measured as ml. Derived parameter will be expressed as their results of calculation.
Generally in our hospital, pre-operative investigation will be done about 30 days before surgery, post-operative investigation will within 1year after surgery.
Study Arms (3)
mesh surgery
Data obtained before the operation
Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy
Data obtained before the operation
a hysterectomy with trans-vaginal mesh repair (Surelift®, Neomedic International, Barcelona, Spain)
Data obtained before the operation
Interventions
Urodynamic investigations (The urodynamic study included free uroflowmetry, postvoid residual, filling and voiding cystometry, and a urethral pressure profile. The filling cystometry and urethral pressure profile were performed with 37 degrees C normal saline similar to body temperature at an infusion rate of 80 ml/min.
All surgeries were performed using a DaVinci robotic system (Intuitive® Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, California,US) with standardized technique and materials. Patients were positioned in dorsal lithotomy and steep Trendelenburg position. Trocars were placed bilaterally, and an assistant port was placed laterally. The peritoneum was opened medial to the ureter to develop an avascular space. The mesh was placed on the posterior and anterior vaginal wall and fixed at the level of anterior longitudinal ligaments S1/S2 by sutures. An intraoperative clinical examination was performed to ensure the mesh was in a tension-free position.
In summary, a vertical incision was made in the anterior vaginal wall to access the vesicovaginal space. The sacrospinous ligament was dissected, and an applicator was inserted and positioned over the SSL. The anchor was fixed to the SSL and the thread was attached to the mesh. The mesh was then adjusted in a tension-free manner, excess mesh was cut, and the incision was closed with suture.
Eligibility Criteria
History of POP patients with concurrent objective and/or subjective voiding dysfunctions who underwent primary TVM surgery for symptomatic POP ≥ stage II (POP Quantification system; POP-Q system) in Mackay Memorial Hospital were recruited.
You may qualify if:
- Pelvic organ prolapse patients with objective / subjective voiding dysfunctions
- Underwent surgery for symptomatic POP ≥ stage II (POP-Q system)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a history of pelvic radiation.
- Patients with a history of vesico-/recto-/urethra-vaginal fistula
- Patients unable to be followed up.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
New Taipei City, Taiwan
Related Publications (16)
Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Chapple C, Cottenden A, Davila W, de Ridder D, Dmochowski R, Drake M, Dubeau C, Fry C, Hanno P, Smith JH, Herschorn S, Hosker G, Kelleher C, Koelbl H, Khoury S, Madoff R, Milsom I, Moore K, Newman D, Nitti V, Norton C, Nygaard I, Payne C, Smith A, Staskin D, Tekgul S, Thuroff J, Tubaro A, Vodusek D, Wein A, Wyndaele JJ; Members of Committees; Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence. Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):213-40. doi: 10.1002/nau.20870. No abstract available.
PMID: 20025020BACKGROUNDGREEN TH Jr. Development of a plan for the diagnosis and treatment of urinary stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1962 Mar 1;83:632-48. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)35894-x. No abstract available.
PMID: 13901453BACKGROUNDMcGuire EJ, Lytton B, Kohorn EI, Pepe V. The value of urodynamic testing in stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 1980 Aug;124(2):256-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55396-3.
PMID: 7401242BACKGROUNDUlmsten U, Johnson P, Rezapour M. A three-year follow up of tension free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Apr;106(4):345-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08272.x.
PMID: 10426241BACKGROUNDFusco F, Abdel-Fattah M, Chapple CR, Creta M, La Falce S, Waltregny D, Novara G. Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Comparative Data on Colposuspensions, Pubovaginal Slings, and Midurethral Tapes in the Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence. Eur Urol. 2017 Oct;72(4):567-591. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.026. Epub 2017 May 4.
PMID: 28479203BACKGROUNDJiao B, Lai S, Xu X, Zhang M, Diao T, Zhang G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision mini-slings (MiniArc) versus transobturator mid-urethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(14):e0283. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010283.
PMID: 29620645BACKGROUNDStav K, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, Schierlitz L, Lim YN, Lee J. Risk factors of treatment failure of midurethral sling procedures for women with urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Feb;21(2):149-55. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1020-9. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
PMID: 19855914BACKGROUNDFord AA, Ogah JA. Retropubic or transobturator mid-urethral slings for intrinsic sphincter deficiency-related stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jan;27(1):19-28. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2797-3. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
PMID: 26220506BACKGROUNDSand PK, Bowen LW, Panganiban R, Ostergard DR. The low pressure urethra as a factor in failed retropubic urethropexy. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Mar;69(3 Pt 1):399-402.
PMID: 3822288BACKGROUNDMcGuire EJ, Fitzpatrick CC, Wan J, Bloom D, Sanvordenker J, Ritchey M, Gormley EA. Clinical assessment of urethral sphincter function. J Urol. 1993 Nov;150(5 Pt 1):1452-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35806-8.
PMID: 8411422BACKGROUNDUebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish DK, Fantl JA. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn. 1995;14(2):131-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.1930140206.
PMID: 7780440BACKGROUNDKenton K, Stoddard AM, Zyczynski H, Albo M, Rickey L, Norton P, Wai C, Kraus SR, Sirls LT, Kusek JW, Litman HJ, Chang RP, Richter HE. 5-year longitudinal followup after retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings. J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.089. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
PMID: 25158274BACKGROUNDFoss Hansen M, Lose G, Kesmodel US, Gradel KO. Reoperation for urinary incontinence: a nationwide cohort study, 1998-2007. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;214(2):263.e1-263.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.069. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
PMID: 26344752BACKGROUNDSun MJ, Chuang YL, Lau HH, Lo TS, Su TH. The efficacy and complications of using transvaginal mesh to treat pelvic organ prolapse in Taiwan: A 10-year review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;60(2):187-192. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.01.031.
PMID: 33678316BACKGROUNDLau HH, Lai CY, Hsieh MC, Peng HY, Chou D, Su TH, Lee JJ, Lin TB. Uneven effects of trans-vaginal mesh reconstruction on the viscoelastic property of the urinary bladder in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2026 Jan 12;13:1677779. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1677779. eCollection 2025.
PMID: 41602457DERIVEDLau HH, Lai CY, Hsieh MC, Peng HY, Chou D, Su TH, Lee JJ, Lin TB. Pressure-volume analysis of thermodynamic workload of voiding - an application in pelvic organ prolapse patients subjected to robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Biomed Eng Lett. 2024 Dec 30;15(2):357-365. doi: 10.1007/s13534-024-00453-5. eCollection 2025 Mar.
PMID: 40026886DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Hui-Hsuan Lau, M.D.
Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- The Office of Research and Development
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 28, 2022
First Posted
January 12, 2023
Study Start
August 1, 2022
Primary Completion
August 1, 2023
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
April 5, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
For we uncertain if this might violate personal information laws in our country.