NCT05682989

Brief Summary

This is a retrospective cohort study, aiming at analyzing the efficacy and safety of mesh surgery in pelvic organ prolapse. The synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse include transvaginal mesh or laparotomy, laparoscope, or robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with mesh augmentation. The investigators would like to evaluate the efficacy and safety, such as recurrence rates and complication rates for women who underwent urogynecology mesh surgery.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
20mo left

Started Aug 2022

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress70%
Aug 2022Dec 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 28, 2022

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 12, 2023

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2023

Completed
4.4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2027

Expected
Last Updated

April 5, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

December 28, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 2, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • trans-vaginal mesh repair

    Urodynamic investigations (The urodynamic study included free uroflowmetry, postvoid residual, filling and voiding cystometry, and a urethral pressure profile. The filling cystometry and urethral pressure profile were performed with 37 degrees C normal saline similar to body temperature at an infusion rate of 80 ml/min. 1. The urodynamic data of POP patient with grade \> or = II, will be retrograde analyzed and and compared. 2. Pressure-associated parameters, such as abdominal pressure (Pabd), detrusor pressure (Pdet) will be measured as centimeter of water column (cmH2O), volume-associated parameters, such as infused volume (Vinf), voided volume (Vvod) and intravesical volume (Vive) will measured as ml. Derived parameter will be expressed as their results of calculation.

    Generally in our hospital, pre-operative investigation will be done about 30 days before surgery, post-operative investigation will within 1year after surgery.

Study Arms (3)

mesh surgery

Data obtained before the operation

Procedure: Urodynamic investigations before and after a mesh surgery protocol.

Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy

Data obtained before the operation

Procedure: Urodynamic investigations before and after a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy protocol.

a hysterectomy with trans-vaginal mesh repair (Surelift®, Neomedic International, Barcelona, Spain)

Data obtained before the operation

Procedure: Urodynamic investigations before and after a hysterectomy with trans-vaginal mesh repair

Interventions

Urodynamic investigations (The urodynamic study included free uroflowmetry, postvoid residual, filling and voiding cystometry, and a urethral pressure profile. The filling cystometry and urethral pressure profile were performed with 37 degrees C normal saline similar to body temperature at an infusion rate of 80 ml/min.

mesh surgery

All surgeries were performed using a DaVinci robotic system (Intuitive® Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, California,US) with standardized technique and materials. Patients were positioned in dorsal lithotomy and steep Trendelenburg position. Trocars were placed bilaterally, and an assistant port was placed laterally. The peritoneum was opened medial to the ureter to develop an avascular space. The mesh was placed on the posterior and anterior vaginal wall and fixed at the level of anterior longitudinal ligaments S1/S2 by sutures. An intraoperative clinical examination was performed to ensure the mesh was in a tension-free position.

Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy

In summary, a vertical incision was made in the anterior vaginal wall to access the vesicovaginal space. The sacrospinous ligament was dissected, and an applicator was inserted and positioned over the SSL. The anchor was fixed to the SSL and the thread was attached to the mesh. The mesh was then adjusted in a tension-free manner, excess mesh was cut, and the incision was closed with suture.

a hysterectomy with trans-vaginal mesh repair (Surelift®, Neomedic International, Barcelona, Spain)

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 100 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

History of POP patients with concurrent objective and/or subjective voiding dysfunctions who underwent primary TVM surgery for symptomatic POP ≥ stage II (POP Quantification system; POP-Q system) in Mackay Memorial Hospital were recruited.

You may qualify if:

  • Pelvic organ prolapse patients with objective / subjective voiding dysfunctions
  • Underwent surgery for symptomatic POP ≥ stage II (POP-Q system)

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a history of pelvic radiation.
  • Patients with a history of vesico-/recto-/urethra-vaginal fistula
  • Patients unable to be followed up.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

New Taipei City, Taiwan

RECRUITING

Related Publications (16)

  • Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Chapple C, Cottenden A, Davila W, de Ridder D, Dmochowski R, Drake M, Dubeau C, Fry C, Hanno P, Smith JH, Herschorn S, Hosker G, Kelleher C, Koelbl H, Khoury S, Madoff R, Milsom I, Moore K, Newman D, Nitti V, Norton C, Nygaard I, Payne C, Smith A, Staskin D, Tekgul S, Thuroff J, Tubaro A, Vodusek D, Wein A, Wyndaele JJ; Members of Committees; Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence. Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):213-40. doi: 10.1002/nau.20870. No abstract available.

    PMID: 20025020BACKGROUND
  • GREEN TH Jr. Development of a plan for the diagnosis and treatment of urinary stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1962 Mar 1;83:632-48. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)35894-x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 13901453BACKGROUND
  • McGuire EJ, Lytton B, Kohorn EI, Pepe V. The value of urodynamic testing in stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 1980 Aug;124(2):256-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55396-3.

    PMID: 7401242BACKGROUND
  • Ulmsten U, Johnson P, Rezapour M. A three-year follow up of tension free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Apr;106(4):345-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08272.x.

    PMID: 10426241BACKGROUND
  • Fusco F, Abdel-Fattah M, Chapple CR, Creta M, La Falce S, Waltregny D, Novara G. Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Comparative Data on Colposuspensions, Pubovaginal Slings, and Midurethral Tapes in the Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence. Eur Urol. 2017 Oct;72(4):567-591. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.026. Epub 2017 May 4.

    PMID: 28479203BACKGROUND
  • Jiao B, Lai S, Xu X, Zhang M, Diao T, Zhang G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision mini-slings (MiniArc) versus transobturator mid-urethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(14):e0283. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010283.

    PMID: 29620645BACKGROUND
  • Stav K, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, Schierlitz L, Lim YN, Lee J. Risk factors of treatment failure of midurethral sling procedures for women with urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Feb;21(2):149-55. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1020-9. Epub 2009 Oct 24.

    PMID: 19855914BACKGROUND
  • Ford AA, Ogah JA. Retropubic or transobturator mid-urethral slings for intrinsic sphincter deficiency-related stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jan;27(1):19-28. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2797-3. Epub 2015 Jul 29.

    PMID: 26220506BACKGROUND
  • Sand PK, Bowen LW, Panganiban R, Ostergard DR. The low pressure urethra as a factor in failed retropubic urethropexy. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Mar;69(3 Pt 1):399-402.

    PMID: 3822288BACKGROUND
  • McGuire EJ, Fitzpatrick CC, Wan J, Bloom D, Sanvordenker J, Ritchey M, Gormley EA. Clinical assessment of urethral sphincter function. J Urol. 1993 Nov;150(5 Pt 1):1452-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35806-8.

    PMID: 8411422BACKGROUND
  • Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish DK, Fantl JA. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn. 1995;14(2):131-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.1930140206.

    PMID: 7780440BACKGROUND
  • Kenton K, Stoddard AM, Zyczynski H, Albo M, Rickey L, Norton P, Wai C, Kraus SR, Sirls LT, Kusek JW, Litman HJ, Chang RP, Richter HE. 5-year longitudinal followup after retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings. J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.089. Epub 2014 Aug 23.

    PMID: 25158274BACKGROUND
  • Foss Hansen M, Lose G, Kesmodel US, Gradel KO. Reoperation for urinary incontinence: a nationwide cohort study, 1998-2007. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;214(2):263.e1-263.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.069. Epub 2015 Sep 5.

    PMID: 26344752BACKGROUND
  • Sun MJ, Chuang YL, Lau HH, Lo TS, Su TH. The efficacy and complications of using transvaginal mesh to treat pelvic organ prolapse in Taiwan: A 10-year review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;60(2):187-192. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.01.031.

    PMID: 33678316BACKGROUND
  • Lau HH, Lai CY, Hsieh MC, Peng HY, Chou D, Su TH, Lee JJ, Lin TB. Uneven effects of trans-vaginal mesh reconstruction on the viscoelastic property of the urinary bladder in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2026 Jan 12;13:1677779. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1677779. eCollection 2025.

  • Lau HH, Lai CY, Hsieh MC, Peng HY, Chou D, Su TH, Lee JJ, Lin TB. Pressure-volume analysis of thermodynamic workload of voiding - an application in pelvic organ prolapse patients subjected to robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Biomed Eng Lett. 2024 Dec 30;15(2):357-365. doi: 10.1007/s13534-024-00453-5. eCollection 2025 Mar.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ProlapsePathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Hui-Hsuan Lau, M.D.

    Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Hui-Hsuan Lau, M.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
The Office of Research and Development

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2022

First Posted

January 12, 2023

Study Start

August 1, 2022

Primary Completion

August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

April 5, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

For we uncertain if this might violate personal information laws in our country.

Locations