SmartSystem Virtual Reality Headset Perimeter Versus Humphrey HFA-III Perimeter
Comparison of a Novel Head-Mounted Perimeter Versus the Humphrey Field Analyzer
1 other identifier
interventional
52
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare a new device for testing peripheral vision (the SmartSystem virtual reality headset) to the currently most commonly used standard testing device (the Humphrey HFA-III). The main questions this clinical trials aims to answer are:
- 1.How comparable in performance, accuracy, and patient comfort the SmartSystem VR headset is to the Humphrey HFA-III, and
- 2.Surveying patients about the perceived ease of use and patient experience with the SmartSystem VR headset, compared to the Humphrey HFA-III.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 3, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 9, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 9, 2024
CompletedAugust 9, 2024
August 1, 2024
5 months
January 3, 2023
June 18, 2024
August 6, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Visual Field Performance Metric #1 - Mean Deviation
Mean deviation indicates how much, on average, an entire visual field deviates from the age-normal value. It is the center-weighted average of the decibel deviations at each point tested in the visual field test. The measurement is reported in decibels.
This measurement will automatically be reported upon conclusion of each visual field test. Visual field testing is estimated to take 5-15 minutes for each visual field test. All testing will occur on the same day within a 1-2 hour period.
Visual Field Performance Metric #2 - Pattern Standard Deviation
Pattern standard deviation reflects irregularities in a visual field, such as those caused by localized defects. This metric shows sensitivity losses after adjusting for generalized depression or elevation in the overall hill of vision (e.g. cataracts). The measurement is reported in decibels.
This measurement will automatically be reported upon conclusion of each visual field test. Visual field testing is estimated to take 5-15 minutes for each visual field test. All testing will occur on the same day within a 1-2 hour period.
Visual Field Performance Metric #3 - Test Duration
This metric indicates how long each visual field test took to complete per eye.
These measurements will be derived during data analysis following study completion. The exact study duration is unclear; however, we aim to recruit enough patients to analyze 80 eyes worth of data. We estimate this will take 3-6 months.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Visual Field User Experience Question #1 - "How Would You Rate the Comfort of the [Humphrey Field Analyzer/Smart System Virtual Reality Headset]?"
Subjects will respond to an approximately 5-10 minute survey upon completion of both visual field tests. The survey will be administered the same day as visual field testing at the conclusion of the estimated 1-2 hour period.
Visual Field User Experience Question #2 - "How Hard or Easy Was it to Understand the Instructions Given to You for How to do the Visual Field Test Using the [Humphrey Field Analyzer/Smart System Virtual Reality Headset]?"
Subjects will respond to an approximately 5-10 minute survey upon completion of both visual field tests. The survey will be administered the same day as visual field testing at the conclusion of the estimated 1-2 hour period.
Visual Field User Experience Question #3 - "How Hard or Easy Was it to Use and/or Perform the Visual Field Test Using the [Humphrey Field Analyzer/Smart System Virtual Reality Headset]?"
Subjects will respond to an approximately 5-10 minute survey upon completion of both visual field tests. The survey will be administered the same day as visual field testing at the conclusion of the estimated 1-2 hour period.
Visual Field User Experience Question #4 - "How Much Anxiety or Concern Did You Have About Your Test Performance While Using the [Humphrey Field Analyzer/Smart System Virtual Reality Headset]?"
Subjects will respond to an approximately 5-10 minute survey upon completion of both visual field tests. The survey will be administered the same day as visual field testing at the conclusion of the estimated 1-2 hour period.
Visual Field User Experience Question #5 - "Given Instruction and Training, Would You Feel Comfortable Performing Visual Field Testing by Yourself at Home Using the Smart System Virtual Reality Headset?"
Subjects will respond to an approximately 5-10 minute survey upon completion of both visual field tests. The survey will be administered the same day as visual field testing at the conclusion of the estimated 1-2 hour period.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group A: HFA followed by SSVR
OTHERPatients will have one or both eyes (dependent on inclusion/exclusion criteria) tested with both the Humphrey HFA-III perimeter and the SmartSystem VR headset on the same clinic visit, spaced roughly 10-15 minutes apart. The sequence in which each patient undertakes the two tests will be randomized. Group A includes participants who tested using the HFA, followed by a 15 minute rest period, then tested with the SSVR.
Group B: SSVR followed by HFA
OTHERPatients will have one or both eyes (dependent on inclusion/exclusion criteria) tested with both the Humphrey HFA-III perimeter and the SmartSystem VR headset on the same clinic visit, spaced roughly 10-15 minutes apart. The sequence in which each patient undertakes the two tests will be randomized. Group B includes participants who tested using the SSVR, followed by a 15 minute rest period, then tested with the HFA.
Interventions
Patients will undergo visual field testing with the head-mounted SmartSystem VR Headset perimeter.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients between 18-100 years of age with suspected, mild, moderate, or severe glaucoma
You may not qualify if:
- Non-English speakers, patients with systemic or ocular disease affecting central vision, best corrected visual acuity less than 20/80, neurocognitive or psychiatric disorders that would confound visual field testing, those with physical inability to perform testing, and astigmatism with absolute values greater than 2.00 diopters
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Andrew Pouw, MDlead
Study Sites (1)
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Related Publications (6)
Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 May;80(5):389-93. doi: 10.1136/bjo.80.5.389.
PMID: 8695555BACKGROUNDQuigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;90(3):262-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224.
PMID: 16488940BACKGROUNDBeck RW, Bergstrom TJ, Lichter PR. A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter. Ophthalmology. 1985 Jan;92(1):77-82. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(85)34065-4.
PMID: 3974997BACKGROUNDHollander DA, Volpe NJ, Moster ML, Liu GT, Balcer LJ, Judy KD, Galetta SL. Use of a portable head mounted perimetry system to assess bedside visual fields. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Oct;84(10):1185-90. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.10.1185.
PMID: 11004108BACKGROUNDMees L, Upadhyaya S, Kumar P, Kotawala S, Haran S, Rajasekar S, Friedman DS, Venkatesh R. Validation of a Head-mounted Virtual Reality Visual Field Screening Device. J Glaucoma. 2020 Feb;29(2):86-91. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001415.
PMID: 31790067BACKGROUNDNakai Y, Bessho K, Shono Y, Taoka K, Nakai Y. Comparison of imo and Humphrey field analyzer perimeters in glaucomatous eyes. Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec 18;14(12):1882-1887. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.12.11. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34926203BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Andrew Pouw
- Organization
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrew Pouw, MD
University of Iowa
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2023
First Posted
January 9, 2023
Study Start
January 3, 2023
Primary Completion
June 1, 2023
Study Completion
June 1, 2023
Last Updated
August 9, 2024
Results First Posted
August 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share