Rectal Indomethacin vs Intravenous Ketorolac
Post ERCP Pancreatitis Prophylaxis, Effectiveness of Rectal Indomethacin vs Intravenous Ketorolac in the Pediatric Population
1 other identifier
interventional
192
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an essential procedure that can be complicated by post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Indomethacin and ketorolac are two medications used to prevent PEP. The main reason for this research study is to compare the effectiveness these drugs at reducing rates of PEP. There have been no studies comparing the effectiveness of these medications in preventing PEP in pediatric patients. You are being asked to take part in this research study because you are scheduled to have an ERCP as part of your medical care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Nov 2022
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 7, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 23, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 5, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 5, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 12, 2026
CompletedMarch 12, 2026
March 1, 2026
2.2 years
November 23, 2022
February 5, 2026
March 10, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
Below is the number of participants within the rectal indomethacin and IV ketorolac cohorts who developed Post-ERCP Pancreatitis- Post ERCP Pancreatitis: A patient must have at least 2 of the following to establish a diagnosis of post ERCP pancreatitis: 1. Characteristic physical exam findings- pain worse than admission per pain scales (please see point 2) and/or nausea 2. Amylase (unit/L) or lipase(unit/L) greater than 3 times the age appropriate upper limit of normal. * Normal range of amylase (15-127 unit/L) * Normal range of lipase (12-50 unit/L) 3. Confirmatory imaging (Ultrasound, CT or MRI) that suggests or demonstrates pancreatic inflammation
2 weeks
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Pancreatic Duct Injections
86 participants from the rectal indomethacin cohort and 83 from IV ketorolac received pancreatic duct injections during their ERCP. Below we describe the outcome measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis vs. no pancreatitis for those who received pancreatic duct injections.
2 weeks
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Native Papilla
36 participants from the rectal indomethacin cohort and 33 from IV ketorolac had a native papilla for their ERCP. Below we describe the outcome measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis vs. no pancreatitis for those who had a native papilla.
2 weeks
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Pancreatic Sphincterotomy
25 participants from the rectal indomethacin cohort and 19 from IV ketorolac received pancreatic sphincterotomies during their ERCP. Below we describe the outcome measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis vs. no pancreatitis for those who received pancreatic sphincterotomies.
2 weeks
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Opti-Ray Amount
83 participants from the rectal indomethacin cohort and 84 from IV ketorolac received various amounts of Opti-Ray during their ERCP. Below we describe the outcome measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis vs. no pancreatitis for those who received Opti-Ray.
2 weeks
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Therapeutic Pancreatic Duct Stent Placed
51 participants from the rectal indomethacin cohort and 53 from IV ketorolac received a therapeutic pancreatic duct stent during their ERCP. Below we describe the outcome measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis vs. no pancreatitis for those who received therapeutic pancreatic duct stents.
2 weeks
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Prophylactic Pancreatic Duct Stent Placed
11 participants from the rectal indomethacin cohort and 11 from IV ketorolac received a prophylactic pancreatic duct stent during their ERCP. Below we describe the outcome measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis vs. no pancreatitis for those who received prophylactic pancreatic duct stents.
2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Pain Assessed by FLACC or NRS Scoring Post ERCP: PACU
2 weeks
Pain Assessed by FLACC or NRS Scoring Post ERCP: Evening
2 weeks
Pain Assessed by FLACC or NRS Scoring Post ERCP: Morning
2 weeks
Laboratory Markers Associated With PEP ( Lipase)
2 weeks
Laboratory Markers Associated With PEP (Amylase)
2 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Rectal indomethacin
EXPERIMENTALDosage based on subject's weight: \>=50 kg, 100 mg; 30-49 kg, 50 mg; 10-29 kg, 25 mg
IV ketorolac
EXPERIMENTALDosage based on subject's weight: 0.5 mg/kg (maximum: 15 mg)
Interventions
Dosage based on subject's weight: \>=50 kg, 100 mg; 30-49 kg, 50 mg; 10-29 kg, 25 mg
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Any patient undergoing ERCP (diagnostic or therapeutic with cannulation of the major or minor papilla)
- Age 6 month- 21 years old
You may not qualify if:
- \< 10 kg
- Low risk subgroup: Biliary indication with history of prior biliary sphincterotomy.
- High risk for bleeding (Example: Planned liver biopsy)
- Gastrointestinal bleeding in previous 3 days
- Acute pancreatitis (within 3 days) at the time of ERCP
- Use of NSAIDs in the previous 5 days
- Peptic ulcer disease
- Acute kidney Injury or Known Chronic Kidney Disease per KDIGO
- Pregnancy (Pregnancy tests are administered prior to ERCP as standard of care)
- Lithium therapy
- Allergy to ketorolac or indomethacin
- Organ Dysfunction or SIRS
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- David Vitale MDlead
Study Sites (1)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. David Vitale
- Organization
- Cincinnati Children's
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Vitale, MD
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2022
First Posted
December 23, 2022
Study Start
November 7, 2022
Primary Completion
February 5, 2025
Study Completion
February 5, 2025
Last Updated
March 12, 2026
Results First Posted
March 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03