Use of Chitosan Powder in Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
1 other identifier
interventional
130
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Early treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II-III gives rise to a decrease in the incidence of invasive cervical cancer. Though there is no obvious consensus from randomized studies as to the optimal management of CIN II-III, loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) is the most extensively used method because of its technical ease, inexpensive, steep learning curve, and low rate of complications. In spite of these benefits, current literature suggests that some patients experience some complications such as postoperative vaginal bleeding, abnormal vaginal discharge, abdominal pain, and infection. These adversely affect the recovery period, increase patient anxiety, readmission to the hospital for further treatment and encumber patients' daily life. Postoperative vaginal bleeding (PVB) is one of the most common and unpleasant of these complications. Its incidence has been reported to vary between 2% to 78%. Many different types of treatments have been applied to avert or diminish PVC such as the use of vasopressin, tranexamic acid, Monsel's solution, and local hemostats (e.g., TachoSil or Tisseel), but these attempts have failed to show precise benefits over routine clinical approaches. Chitosan is a biodegradable, natural polyaminosaccharide with a nontoxic, non-allergenic, positively-charged polysaccharide derived from the deacetylation of chitin. Due to its molecular characteristics, chitosan has been used for improved hemostasis. Furthermore, chitosan has an antimicrobial and wound-healing effect. The current literature concerning the influence of using chitosan after the LEEP is limited to only one trial. The authors of that study reported that using chitosan after the LEEP can reduce vaginal bleeding and enhancing wound healing. However, that study has some limitations. Therefore, investigators designed this randomized trial to assess the effect of local chitosan implementation on postoperative vaginal bleeding and wound healing in LEEP
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Dec 2022
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 13, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 15, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 22, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 17, 2024
CompletedJune 26, 2024
June 1, 2024
1.2 years
December 13, 2022
June 25, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
median early postoperative blood loss
early postoperative blood loss using the difference in hematocrit values after LEEP and 24 h after the procedure according to the following formula: estimated blood loss = estimated blood volume × (hematocrit 1 - hematocrit 2) / hematocrit 1, where the estimated blood volume in milliliters = body weight in kilograms × 85
6 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Wound healing score
1-4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONLEEP was performed in an outpatient setting by a single resident physician (KG). A full blood count was taken (hematocrit 1). The procedure was designed according to colposcopic findings such as the type of transformation zone and position of the lesion. After positioning of the patient, 50 mg of lidocaine spray (5 pumps, 10 mg in each pump) was applied to the ectocervix, then 2 mL bupivacaine hydrochloride was injected submucosally using a 27-gauge needle tip at the 3, 6, 9, and 12 o'clock locations in the ectocervix. LEEP was performed as described in a previous trial. After the hemostasis that obtained using the ball electrode at a 40-W coagulation setting, the remaining cervical tissue was washed with 20 ccs of sterile saline to ensure no active bleeding from the cervical wound. An empty spray pump was used because we cannot find any identical powder for the placebo
Chitosan
EXPERIMENTALLEEP was performed in an outpatient setting by a single resident physician (KG). A full blood count was taken (hematocrit 1). The procedure was designed according to colposcopic findings such as the type of transformation zone and position of the lesion. After positioning of the patient, 50 mg of lidocaine spray (5 pumps, 10 mg in each pump) was applied to the ectocervix, then 2 mL bupivacaine hydrochloride was injected submucosally using a 27-gauge needle tip at the 3, 6, 9, and 12 o'clock locations in the ectocervix. LEEP was performed as described in a previous trial. After the hemostasis that obtained using the ball electrode at a 40-W coagulation setting, the remaining cervical tissue was washed with 20 ccs of sterile saline to ensure no active bleeding from the cervical wound. The application of 3 or 4 pumps of chitosan powder was carried out into the wound bed by spray pump which was prepared by a nurse.
Interventions
Chitosan is a biodegradable, natural polyaminosaccharide with a nontoxic, non-allergenic, positively-charged polysaccharide derived from the deacetylation of chitin. Due to its molecular characteristics, chitosan has been used for improved hemostasis. Furthermore, chitosan has an antimicrobial and wound-healing effect
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- women were aged \> 21 years old
- women were not pregnant
- women who were undergoing LEEP.
You may not qualify if:
- Women with pelvic infection
- Women with abnormal vaginal bleeding
- Women with coagulopathy
- Women with chronic pain syndromes
- Women with psychiatric disorders
- Women with the previous hysterectomy with removal of the cervix,
- Women with a history of cervical cancer
- Women who could not complete follow-up calls
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Kemal Güngördük
Menteşe, Muğla, 48000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Mugla Sıtkı Kocman University Education and Research Hospital
Muğla, 48000, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor - Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 13, 2022
First Posted
December 22, 2022
Study Start
December 15, 2022
Primary Completion
March 15, 2024
Study Completion
May 17, 2024
Last Updated
June 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share