NCT05659433

Brief Summary

Background: Retroperitoneal tumors are typically large and inhomogeneous, with a variable amount of necrosis within the tumor mass which decreases the diagnostic yield of biopsy (false negative or inadequate). Rationale: Real-time contrast enhancement can highlight the viable tumoral tissue and avoid the necrotic area. Aims: To compare contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guidance and conventional (B-mode) ultrasound (US) guidance in terms of diagnostic yield, need for repeat biopsy, and rate of adverse events. Methods: A consecutive series of patients with previously documented retroperitoneal tumors and indications for percutaneous biopsy were randomly assigned to benefit from the standard of practice B-mode US-guided biopsy or CEUS-guided biopsy. The diagnostic accuracy, need for repeat biopsy, and adverse events were noted.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
160

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2015

Completed
7.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 15, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 30, 2022

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 3, 2022

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 21, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

December 21, 2022

Status Verified

December 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

7.7 years

First QC Date

December 3, 2022

Last Update Submit

December 12, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Percutaneous biopsyContrast-enhanced ultrasonographyCEUSRetroperitoneal neoplasms

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of patients with a biopsy sample adequate for pathology interpretation

    4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of patients requiring a second biopsy due to prior inadequate sampling

    6 weeks

  • Number of patients with procedural-related adverse events

    One week

Study Arms (2)

B-mode Ultrasound-guided Biopsy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: B-mode US-guided percutaneous biopsy

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound-guided Biopsy

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: CEUS-guided percutaneous biopsy

Interventions

A standard dose of SonoVue ultrasound contrast agent is injected prior to the biopsy, and the percutaneous biopsy is guided in real time, targeting the contrast-enhanced areas of the retroperitoneal tumors (viable, vascularized)

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound-guided Biopsy

Standard of care (B-mode) ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy, without contrast enhancement

B-mode Ultrasound-guided Biopsy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients with retroperitoneal tumors with indication for percutaneous biopsy

You may not qualify if:

  • Tumors inaccessible for ultrasound guided biopsy
  • Standard contraindications for biopsy (altered coagulation tests, poor performance status)
  • Lack of written informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Prof. Dr. O. Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, 400162, Romania

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Retroperitoneal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Abdominal NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasms

Study Officials

  • Zeno Spârchez, MD, Prof.

    Prof. Dr. O. Fodor Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cluj-Napoca

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2022

First Posted

December 21, 2022

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion

September 15, 2022

Study Completion

November 30, 2022

Last Updated

December 21, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations